Abstract
This chapter presents an early engineering curriculum for the PreK classroom, justifies the developmental appropriateness of the curriculum by presenting relevant research studies, and concludes with the introduction of an observation protocol to be used by class teachers to identify and evaluate engineering learning. In early education engineering related resources are still very limited. Scattered activities or small scale engineering lesson plans can be found for a teacher to use in class mostly lacking appropriate assessment tools. Additional obstacles center on teacher preparedness and ensuing “discomfort” with engineering content, terminology, and procedures. Limited exposure to engineering content reputed as a difficult discipline requiring rigorous specialization, makes most teachers apprehensive and very reluctant to explore and introduce it in the curriculum. The early engineering curriculum discussed here was developed and implemented in a PreK classroom for 4 months. Student learning and the teacher experience were at the center of the research. The proposed observation protocol was designed in alignment with the research findings. Observation is a powerful tool and in this case it is used to inform assessment in early education. The protocol is expected to assist PreK teachers in developing deep understanding of how to identify and evaluate engineering learning in class.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ABET. (2016). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2016–2017. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017/.
Bagiati, A (2011). Early engineering: A developmentally appropriate curriculum for young children. Dissertation, School of Engineering Education. Purdue University.
Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2011, October 4–7). Starting young: Outcomes of a developmentally appropriate PreK engineering curriculum. In Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Madrid, Spain.
Bagiati, A., Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: The teacher’s experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1).
Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2016). Practicing engineering while building with blocks: Identifying engineering thinking. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(1).
Bagiati, A., Yoon Yoon, S., Evangelou, D., Kaloustian, G., Cekic, O., Zhu, J., & Magana, A. (2011, June 26–29). Engineering in early education: A Multicultural comparison of web resources. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
Bagiati, A., Yoon, S.Y., Evangelou, D., & Ngambeki, I. (2010). Engineering curricula in early education: Describing the landscape of open resources. Early Childhood Research & Practice, V12(2).
Bagiati, A., Yoon, S.Y., Evangelou, D., Magana, A., Kaloustian, G., & Zhu, J. (2015). The landscape of PreK-12 engineering online resources for teachers: Global trends. International Journal of STEM Education, V2(1).
Bairaktarova, D., Evangelou, D., Bagiati, A., & Brophy, S. (2011). Engineering in young children’s exploratory play with tangible materials. Children, Youth and Environments, 21(2).
Bonawitz, E., Shafto, P., Gweon, H., Chang, I., Katz, S., & Schulz, L. (2009). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Modeling the effect of pedagogical contexts on preschoolers’ exploratory play. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, July 29th-August 1st. Netherlands: VU University Amsterdam.
Brophy, S., & Evangelou, D. (2007). Precursors to Engineering Thinking (PET) Project: Intentional Designs with Experimental Artifacts (IDEA). In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Honolulu, HI: American Society for Engineering Education.
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369.
Cook, C., Goodman, N. D., & Schulz, L. E. (2011). Where science starts: Spontaneous experiments in preschoolers’ exploratory play. Cognition, 120(3), 341–349.
Culver, D. E. (2012). A qualitative assessment of preservice elementary teachers’ formative perceptions regarding engineering and K-12 engineering education (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd. (Paper 12888).
DeJarnette, N. (2012). America’s children: Providing early exposure to STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) initiatives. Education, 133(1), 77–84.
DiFrancesca, D., Lee, C., & McIntyre, E. (2014). Where Is the “E” in STEM for young children? Engineering Design education in an elementary teacher preparation program. Issues in Teacher Education, 23(1), 49.
Dodge, D. T. & Colker, L. (1996). The creative curriculum for early childhood (3rd ed.).
Duncan, D., Diefes-Dux, H., & Gentry, M. (2011). Professional development through engineering academies: An examination of elementary teachers’ recognition and understanding of engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 520–539.
Evangelou, D., Dobbs-Oates, J., Bagiati, A., Liang, S., & Choi, J. Y. (2010). Talking about artifacts: Preschool children’s explorations with sketches, stories, and tangible objects. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 12(2).
Hedtke, R., Kahlert, J., & Schwier, V. (2001). Service industry for teachers? Using the Internet to plan lessons. European Journal of Education, 36(2), 189–193.
Hsu, M. C., Purzer, S., & Cardella, M. E. (2011). Elementary teachers’ views about teaching design, engineering, and technology. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2), 31–39.
Jahan, K., & DeJarnette, N. (2014). A mobile program for enhancing engineering education. In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
Jamblon, J. R, Dombro, A. L., & Dichtelmiller, M. L. (2007). The power of observation: Birth through eight (2nd ed.). Teaching Strategies. ISBN 9781933021.
Jennings, K. D., Harmon, R. J., Morgan, G. A., Gaiter, J. L., & Yarrow, L. J. (1979). Exploratory play as an index of mastery motivation: Relationships to persistence, cognitive functioning, and environmental measures. Developmental Psychology, 15(4), 386.
Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects (594p). Performer: National Academy of Engineering, Washington, DC.; National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Katz, L. G. (1999). Another look at what young children should be learning. ERIC Digest. Available: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED430735.pdf.
Katz, L. G., & Chard, S. (2000). Engaging children’s minds: The project approach (2nd ed.).
Korošec, H. (2012). Playing with puppets in class—Teaching and learning with pleasure. The Power of the Puppet, 29.
Majaron, E. (2012). Arts as the pathway to the child. The Power of the Puppet, 11–18.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). Developmentally Appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Position Statement: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Next Generation Science Standards. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states by states, next generation science standards. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/login.php%3frecord_id%3d18290%26page%3dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.nap.edu%2Fdownload%2F18290.
Newburger, A., & Vaughan, E. (2006). Teaching numeracy, langage, and literacy with blocks. St Paul, MN: Redleaf Press.
Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world. New York: Harcort, Brace.
Recker, M. (2006). Perspectives on teachers as digital library users: Consumers, contributors, and designers. D-Lib Magazine, 12(9), 2.
Rinaldi, C. (2006a). In dialogue with Regio Emilia: Listening, researching, and learning. New York: Routledge.
Rinaldi, C. (2006b). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning. Psychology Press.
Stacey, S. (2009). Emergent curriculum in early childhood settings: From theory to practice. Saint Paul, MN: Redleaf Press.
Tepylo, D. H., Moss, J., & Stephenson, C. (2015). A developmental look at a rigorous block play program. Young Children, 18–25. Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/yc/files/yc/file/201503/YC0315_Tepylo.pdf.
Wien, C. A. (1995). Developmentally appropriate practice in “Real Life”: Stories of teacher practical knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 1: Terminology and Concepts Addressed Through P2E Lesson Plans (Bagiati, 2011, pp. 60–62)
Appendix 1: Terminology and Concepts Addressed Through P2E Lesson Plans (Bagiati, 2011, pp. 60–62)
Lesson plan title | New engineering-related concepts and terminology | Revisited engineering concepts and terminology | Rationale to be addressed |
---|---|---|---|
“I have a great idea!” | Engineers, desire, discussion, usage | Engineering usually is initiated by someone’s desire to create and construct something new or to alter something that already exists in order to achieve a new goal. Engineers discuss the new idea about how things can be used. | |
“Making a decision!” | Decision-making, brainstorming, constraints , criteria | Engineers, discussion, usage | Engineers usually brainstorm and then revisit their initial ideas to see if any new idea has appeared before coming to a final decision. After brainstorming and coming up with a set of new ideas or possible solutions, engineers have to also consider the constraints . |
“Let’s look at building elements!” | Building, observing, elements | Engineers, discussion, usage, decision making, criteria | While constructing a building there are plenty of building elements that an engineer can think about designing and implementing. |
“Let’s look what it is made of!” | Materials | Building, observing, elements, decision making, criteria | While constructing a building, depending on the climate, cost, usability, and numerous other factors, an engineer can select to use different materials on the building. |
“Let’s make a model” | Design, model | Building, elements, materials | After brainstorming and doing some first drafts on paper, engineers start to try to come up with 3D models of the construction, which can be made out of many different materials : paper models, cardboard models, and models with mixed materials . |
“Let’s improve our models” | Improve | Discussion, design, model, material, usage | Today you will revisit the 3D models you created, discuss them, and attempt to improve them. |
“Let’s show our ideas” | Design representations , drawing , sketch, floor plan | Engineers, design, models | Engineers are using different representations in order to communicate their ideas with clients/other engineers/constructors, etc. Today you will introduce children to these types of representations . |
“Let’s show our ideas differently” | Maquettes, consult | Design representations , drawing , sketch, floor plan, model, improve | Today children will revisit and discuss these representations and work on their maquettes. |
“Let’s sketch it” | Sketch, present | Buildings, observing, drawing , discussion | There is a lot of discussion regarding how much inspiration and creativity freehand sketching is stimulating. For this reason, we want to take the children on a field trip in order to observe and free sketch their environment. |
“Let’s observe our building” | Electricity, water, buttons, switches, pipes, function | Building, sketch, present, observing, discussion, usage | Discuss the sketches. Let the children present them. Then start observing and identifying engineering features in the school building, and start making connections between action and effect(e.g. pressing buttons). |
“Let’s investigate some more” | Handles, investigate | Building, discussion, electricity, water, buttons, switches, pipes, function, observing | Keep observing the building. Add one more element for investigation and discussion (i.e., handles). |
“Let’s see what is around us” | Tables, graphs | Buttons, switches, pipes, handles | After gathering information, engineers use various visual representation tools in order to make the results of the data gathered more obvious. Today the children will do tables and graphs. |
“Let’s get prepared for our constructions” | Information gathering | Criteria list, materials | After having come up with some initial ideas, engineers are creating criteria/requirements lists in order to start planning the actual construction. This is also a good time to consult other engineers in order to discuss problems that may appear in the design, or just to get more ideas. |
“Let’s sketch some more” | Sketch, observe, present | The children will go on another field trip in order to observe and free sketch their environment. | |
“Let’s observe our surroundings” | Get inspired | Observe, discuss | In today’s class, we want the children to observe engineering features in their surroundings that may be used as inspiration to their project. |
“Let’s see where the light is” | Electricity, circuit, lamp | Sketches, drawings, switch, maquettes, model, improve, test | When coming closer to an end product, engineers start to bring more details in their maquettes and models. Revisit previous representation types (e.g., drawings, sketches, maquettes), and try to add more features to them. Today children will create simple electric circuits and will be prompted to use them within their previous work. |
“Let’s search a little more” | Information gathering, communication, consulting, presenting | When coming closer to an end product, engineers do more detailed information gathering about particular elements of the design. Information gathering can include looking at books, online searching, and discussing the issue with other experts in the field. When new ideas are on the table, engineers have to explain the new details to other members of their team. Some days ago, parents were asked to conduct research regarding the project with their children at home or in the surrounding area, and send the information with their children to class. Today the children will present their findings. | |
“Let’s pay a visit” | Consulting, information gathering, observe, communication, exchange of ideas | Today the children will go on a field trip to visit a facility related to their project and gather more information about it by talking to the people who work there. | |
“Let’s ask an engineer” | Model, consulting, improving, comparing, testing, construction, electric circuits, buildings | While developing a final model, engineers try, test, and compare different solutions for various elements in their construction. Along with their personal testing, consulting also takes place. It is not necessary that only one solution is the optimum every time. Today parents or friends that are engineers will visit the class to show the children different ways to assemble and test electric circuits and to discuss the children’s building ideas. | |
“Let’s see what we can build with” | Model, consulting, information gathering, communication, exchange of ideas, materials , presentation | Elements have to be selected to be used for the final model construction to resemble reality and represent the design features as beneficial as possible. Today the children will present in class building materials they brought from home, and they will discuss how they could use them to build their final constructions. Parents and friends that are engineers have also been invited to be in class and participate in the discussion and the building process. | |
“Let’s see how we can improve it” | Decorate | Test, improve, model | Upon completion of construction of the model, engineers revisit it to test and improve it even further, and then start to add decorative elements to provide more context. |
“Let’s build our village” | Synthesize, finalize, | Model, decorate | Upon completion of construction of the final model, engineers revisit it to test and improve the final deliverable and add decorative elements to provide more context. |
“Let’s show it to our friends” | Explain, invite | Model, engineers, present | Upon completion of construction of the final model, engineers present them to colleagues or customers. Today the children will present their work to children from other classrooms, and they will create invitations to invite their parents to come and see their work. |
“Let’s show it to our parents” | Model, maquette engineers, present | Today the children will present their work to their parents. |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bagiati, A., Evangelou, D. (2018). Identifying Engineering in a PreK Classroom: An Observation Protocol to Support Guided Project-Based Instruction. In: English, L., Moore, T. (eds) Early Engineering Learning. Early Mathematics Learning and Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8620-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8621-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)