Abstract
Dynamic epistemic logic (\(\mathbf {DEL}\)) is known as a large family of logics that extend standard epistemic logic with dynamic operators. Such dynamic operators can be regarded as epistemic actions over Kripke semantics (or its variant). Therefore, \(\mathbf {DEL}\) is often used to model changes of agents’ knowledge, belief or preference over Kripke semantics in terms of dynamic operators in many literatures. As a variant of \(\mathbf {DEL}\), (van Benthem and Liu, J Appl Non-Classical Logics 17(2):157–18 2007; Liu, Reasoning about preference dynamics, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin 2011) proposed dynamic logic of relation changers (\(\mathbf {DLRC}\)). They provided a general framework to capture many dynamic operators in terms of relation changing operation written in programs of propositional dynamic logic, and they also provided a sound and complete Hilbert-style axiomatization for \(\mathbf {DLRC}\). While \(\mathbf {DLRC}\) can cover many dynamic operators in a uniform manner, proof theory for \(\mathbf {DLRC}\) is not well-studied except the Hilbert-style axiomatization. Therefore, we propose a cut-free labelled sequent calculus for \(\mathbf {DLRC}\). We show that our sequent calculus is equipollent with the Hilbert-style axiomatization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
In preference logic by van Benthem and Liu, the notion of better-ness for preference is supported by a binary preference relation (i.e., reflexive and transitive relation) over worlds. Common notions of preference play between propositions (or semantically speaking, set of worlds), but their approach emphasizes comparisons of worlds rather than propositions.
- 2.
As we noted in the introduction, the original definitions of atomic programs for these operators are defined as agent’s preferences. If we follow the original definition, we have to introduce additional frame properties to our logic. But, in order to make our story simple, we regard atomic programs semantically as ordinary binary relations. Namely, we do not assume any frame property since an accessibility relation might be changed arbitrarily by a dynamic operator.
- 3.
Ono and Komori (1985) showed the cut elimination theorem of sequent calculi without contraction rules by double induction on complexity and weight, while Kashima (2009) also employed the same measures to show the cut elimination for first-order logic with contraction rules. We note that Gentzen (1964) used measures of complexity and ‘grade.’
References
Balbiani, P., Van Ditmarsch, H., Herzig, A., & De Lima, T. (2010). Tableaux for public announcement logic. Journal of Logic and Computation, 20(1), 55–76.
Balbiani, P., Demange, V., & Galmiche, D. (2014). A sequent calculus with labels for Public Announcement Logic. Advances in Modal Logic (AiML 2014), 6.
Bull, R. (1992). Cut elimination for propositional dynamic logic without *. Zeitschrift fuer Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 38, 85–100.
Frittella, S., Greco, G., Kurz, A., Palmigiano, A., & Sikimíc, V. (2014). Multi-type display calculus for dynamic epistemic logic. Journal of Logic and Computation, 26(6), 2017–2065.
Gentzen, G. (1964). Investigations into logical deduction. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1(4), 288–306.
Gerbrandy, J., & Groeneveld, W. (1997). Reasoning about information change. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 6(2), 147–169.
Harel, D., Kozen, D., & Tiuryn, J. (2000). Dynamic logic. Cambridge: MIT press.
Hill, B., & Poggiolesi, F. (2010). A contraction-free and cut-free sequent calculus for propositional dynamic logic. Studia Logica, 94(1), 47–72.
Kashima, R. (2009). Mathematical logic. Asakura Publishing Co. Ltd. (in Japanese).
Liu, F. (2011). Reasoning about preference dynamics (Vol. 354). Synthese Library, Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
Ma, M., Sano, K., Schwarzentruber, F., & Velázquez-Quesada, F. R. (2015). Tableaux for non normal public announcement logic. Logic and Its Applications (ICLA2015), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8923, 132–145.
Maffezioli, P., & Naibo, A. (2013). Proof theory of epistemic logic of programs. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 23(3), 301–328.
Maffezioli, P., & Negri, S. (2010). A Gentzen-style analysis of public announcement logic. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Logic and Philosophy of Knowledge, Communication and Action, 293–313.
Negri, S. (2005). Proof analysis in modal logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 34(5), 507–544.
Nomura, S., Sano, K., & Tojo, S. (2015). Revising a sequent calculus for public announcement logic. In Structural Analysis of Non-classical Logics: Proceedings of the Second Taiwan Philosophical Logic Colloquium (TPLC-2014), 131–157.
Ono, H., & Komori, Y. (1985). Logics without the contraction rule. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50(01), 169–201.
Plaza, J. (1989). Logics of public communications. In M. L. Emrich, M. S. Pfeifer, M. Hadzikadic & Z. W. Ras (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, 201–216.
van Benthem, J., & Liu, F. (2007). Dynamic logic of preference upgrade. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 17(2), 157–182.
van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., & Kooi, B. P. (2007). Dynamic epistemic logic (Vol. 337). Synthese Library, Berlin: Springer.
Wang, Y., & Cao, Q. (2013). On axiomatizations of public announcement logic. Synthese, 190(1), 103–134.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for his/her helpful comments to revise our manuscript. We would be grateful to the audiences and organizing committee of the joint conference of the 3rd Asian workshop on philosophical logic and the 3rd Taiwan philosophical logic colloquium (AWPL-TPLC 2016). During the conference, the first author was supported by travel grants from the organizing committee of AWPL-TPLC 2016. The work of the second author was partially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) Grant Number 15K21025. The work of the second and the third authors were also supported by JSPS Core-to-Core Program (A. Advanced Research Networks).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hatano, R., Sano, K., Tojo, S. (2017). Cut Free Labelled Sequent Calculus for Dynamic Logic of Relation Changers. In: Yang, SM., Lee, K., Ono, H. (eds) Philosophical Logic: Current Trends in Asia. Logic in Asia: Studia Logica Library. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6355-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6355-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6354-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6355-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)