Abstract
In a period of post-industrial education, how can we understand school learning environments i.e. educational spaces and practices that are concurrently physical, social and cultural? How might theoretical constructs that deal with ideas associated with ‘complexity’, ‘emergence’ and ‘self-organisation’ aid our interpretations of learning environments in the knowledge era? This chapter explores the emergence, co-evolution and mutual adaptation of the physical, social and cultural practices in three schools (primary and secondary) that attempted to develop contemporary pedagogical cultures of practice between 2008 and 2011 in non-traditional learning spaces. Employing theoretical frameworks derived from the literature on ‘complexity theory’ and ‘complex adaptive systems theory’, this chapter explores the influences of new socio-spatial contexts for learning (i.e. innovative learning environments) on the engagement of middle years’ students. To conclude, an argument is put forward for considering school learning environments, schools and school systems as ‘complex adaptive systems’: educational settings that can ‘learn’ in response to positive feedback loops to provide dynamic socio-pedagogical cultures of practice that are aligned with current middle years’ educational theories.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barratt, R. E. (1998). Shaping middle schooling in Australia: A report of the National Middle Schooling Project. Canberra, NSW: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.
Beare, H. (2000). Creating the future school. London: Routledge Falmer.
Bower, D. F. (2006). Sustaining school improvement. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 3(1), 61–72.
Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carrington, V. (2006). Rethinking middle years: Early adolescents, schooling and digital culture. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
Cartmel, T. (2013). Crafting the middle years mosaic. Primary and Middle Years Educator, 11(3), 3.
Carr, W.‚ & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical – Education, knowledge and action research. Philadelphia: Falmer.
Cleveland, B. (2016). Addressing the spatial to catalyze socio-pedagogical reform in middle years’ education, 27–49. In Fisher, K. (Ed.), The translational design of schools. An evidence-based approach to aligning pedagogy and learning environments. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
DEET. (2002). Middle years research and development project: Executive summary. Department of Education, Employment and Training, VIC. www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/curricman/middleyear/research/MYRADExecSummary.doc. Accessed March 25, 2008.
Dovey, K. (2008). Framing places: Mediating power in built form. New York, NY: Routledge.
Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–26.
Ewert, G. D. (1991). Habermas and education: A comprehensive overview of the influence of Habermas in educational literature. Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 345–378.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Fullan, M., Hill, P., & Crevola, C. (2007). Breakthrough. Heatherton, VIC: Hawker Brownlow Education.
Habermas, J. (1971). Towards a rational society. London: Heinemann.
Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and practice. London: Heinemann.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Heylighten, F. (2008). Complexity and self-organisation. In M. J. Bates & M. N. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Heylighten, F., Cilliers, P., & Gershenson, C. (2007). Complexity and philosophy. In J. Bogg & R. Geyer (Eds.), Complexity science and society. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.
Hill, P., & Russell, J. (1999). Systemic, whole-school reform of the middle years of schooling, National Middle Years of Schooling Conference, March 1999. Centre for Applied Educational Research, University of Melbourne.
Jackson, P.A., & Smith, J. (1984). Exploring social geography. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410.
Lodge, C. (2005) From hearing voices to engaging in dialogue: Problematising student participation in school improvement. Journal of Educational Change‚ 6(2):125–146.
Mattsson, M., & Kemmis, S. (2007). Praxis-related research: Serving two masters? Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 15(2), 185–214.
Monahan, T. (2005). Globalization, technological change, and public education. New York: Routledge.
Pendergast, D. (2006). Fast-tracking middle schooling reform: A model for sustainability. Australian Journal of Middle Schooling, 6(2), 13–18.
Pendergast, D., & Bahr, N. (2005). Teaching middle years: Rethinking curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
Riessman, C. R. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Semetsky, I. (2005). Not by breadth alone: Imagining a self-organised classroom. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 2(1)‚ 19–36.
Skill, T. D., & Young, B. A. (2002). Embracing the hybrid model: Working at the intersections of virtual and physical learning spaces. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 92, 23–32.
Strommen, E. & Lincoln, B. (1992). Constructivism, technology and the future of classroom learning. Education and Urban Society‚ 24(4), 466–476.
Sumara, D., & Davis, B. (2009). Complexity theory and action research. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), Educational Action Research. London: SAGE Publications.
Upitis, R. (2004). School architecture and complexity. Complicity An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 1(1), 19–38.
Upitis, R. (2010a). Complexity and design: How school architecture influences learning. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, 3(2), 123–134.
Upitis, R. (2010b). Raising a school: Foundations for school architecture. South Frontenac, ON: Wintergreen Studios Press.
Urry, J. (2008). Climate change, travel and complex futures. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(2), 261–279.
Walby, S. (2003). Complexity theory, globalization and diversity. Paper presented at the Conference of the British Sociological Association.
Webb, N. M. (1982) Student Interaction and Learning in Small Groups. Review of Educational Research‚ 52(3)‚ 421–445.
Weinstein, C. S. (1979). The physical environment of the school: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 49(4), 577–610.
Weiss, A. (2007). Creating the ubiquitous classroom: Integrating physical and virtual learning spaces. The International Journal of Learning, 14(3), 77–84.
Wilks, S. (2005). Designing a thinking curriculum. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER.
Zandvliet, D. B., & Fraser, B. J. (2004). Learning environments in information and communications technology classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(1), 97–123.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cleveland, B. (2018). Innovative Learning Environments as Complex Adaptive Systems: Enabling Middle Years’ Education. In: Benade, L., Jackson, M. (eds) Transforming Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5678-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5678-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5677-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5678-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)