Abstract
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a quantitative model which attempts to assess the aggregated environmental impacts of various life cycle stages of a product and helps in various sustainability support decisions for product design and development. This methodology has been standardized by ISO and been accepted by various organizations and designers. The present study focuses on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) as a tool for Energy Neutrality Assessment with the help of a case study of occupancy sensors in net energy conservation assessed through life cycle energy study and simulation methods provided by LCA tools. Occupancy sensors aim to reduce energy consumption by switching off energy appliances when the monitored space has no occupants. Moreover, it is evident that though it saves some energy at the place of installation but these measures needs to be evaluated from Life-cycle energy framework to effectively understand the net energy conservation over the life cycle of such devices. This approach focuses on two dimensions of investigation, the former being the life-cycle energy involved in the adoption of such a device, while the later concentrates on the environmental aspects of various life cycle stages. In this case study, Occupancy Sensors have been studied for their adoption in typical office buildings. The study would compare the effectiveness of occupancy sensor in reducing net energy consumption computed over its life span with the aid of existing LCA Simulation tools and models. The results reported measures the effectiveness of such measures and devices in net energy conservation and its environmental impacts, accounting for the data uncertainty and limitations in data availability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Core hours are defined to be between 7.5–10 h per day when the office building is being used [12].
- 2.
Since we are using the same databases, we are assuming that the data is internally consistent with time and location. This assumption is only to facilitate a comparative appreciation of the Energy Neutrality concept as applied to various luminaires.
- 3.
GaBi 6 is a powerful LCA tool for product and process sustainability analyses.
- 4.
COMPASS (Comparative Packaging Assessment) is an online software solution for packaging designers and engineers to assess the human and environmental impacts of up to four package designs side-by-side.
- 5.
The Embodied Energy of Luminaires has not been accounted in the energy neutrality study and would be taken up in studying the concept subsequently.
References
Bin, S., Evans, M.: Building energy codes in APP countries building energy use in APP countries (2008)
International Energy Agency: Excerpt from energy balances of non-OECD countries (2015)
Indraganti, M., Ooka, R., Rijal, H.B.: Field investigation of comfort temperature in Indian office buildings: a case of Chennai and Hyderabad. Build. Environ. 65, 195–214 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.04.007
Central Electricity Authority Government of India: Power scenario at a glance (2012)
Mills, E.: Global lighting energy savings potential. Light Eng. 1–10 (2002)
Bhatt, M.S., Rajkumar, N., Jothibasu, S., Sudirkumar, R., Pandian, G., Nair, K.R.C.: Commercial and residential building energy labeling. J. Sci. Ind. Res. (India) 64, 30–34 (2005)
United Nations Development Programme: Energy efficiency improvements in commercial buildings (2012)
Degelman, L.O.: A model for evaluation of life-cycle energy savings of occupancy sensors for control of lighting and ventilation in office buildings. In: Proceedings of Twelfth Symposium on Improving Building Systems in Hot and Humid Climates. San Antonio, TX, 15–17 May 2000
Floyd, D.B., Parker, D.S., Sherwin, J.R.: Measured field performance and energy savings of occupancy sensors: three case studies. Florida Sol. Energy Cent. 97–105 (2002) (Online Publication)
Haq, M.A.U., Hassan, M.Y., Abdullah, H., Rahman, H.A., Abdullah, M.P., Hussin, F., Said, D.M.: A review on lighting control technologies in commercial buildings, their performance and affecting factors. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 33, 268–279 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.090
Benya, J., Heschong, L., McGowan, T., Miller, N., Rubinstein, F., Erwine, B., Clanton, N., Neils, M., Mahone, D.: Advanced lighting guidelines (2001)
Lighting Research Center: Reducing barrier to use of high efficiency lighting systems (2002)
Rabaey, J., Arens, E., Federspiel, C., Gadgil, A., Messerschmitt, D., Nazaroff, W., Pister, K., Oren, S., Varaiya, P.: Smart energy distribution and consumption: information technology as an enabling force (2001)
UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative: Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment: making informed choices on products (2011)
WCED: Our Common Future. London (1987)
ISO 14044: ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines (2006)
Guinée, J.B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P., Buonamici, R., Ekvall, T., Rydberg, T.: Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 90–96 (2011). doi:10.1021/es101316v
Organization IS: ISO 14040: Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework (1997)
Klüppel, H.-J.: ISO 14041: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—goal and scope definition—inventory analysis. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 3, 301 (1998)
Ryding, S.-O.: ISO 14042 environmental management life cycle assessment life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 4, 307 (1999)
Lecouls, H.: ISO 14043: Environmental management life cycle assessment life cycle interpretation. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 4, 245 (1999)
Hauschild, M., Jeswiet, J., Alting, L.: From life cycle assessment to sustainable production: status and perspectives. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 54, 1–21 (2005). doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60017-1
De Smet, B., Stalmans, M.: LCI data and data quality. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 1, 96–104 (1996)
Bjorklund, A.E.: Survey of approaches to improve reliability in LCA. 7, 64–72. (2002). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/lca2001.12.071
Kota, S., Chakrabarti, A.: Development of a method for estimating uncertainty in evaluation of environmental impacts during design. In: International Conference on Engineering Design, Paris, France, pp. 1–10 (2007)
Ciroth, A.: Validation—the missing link in life cycle assessment. towards pragmatic LCAs. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 11, 295–297 (2006). doi:10.1065/lca2006.09.271
Huijbregts, M.A.J., Norris, G., Bretz, R., Ciroth, A., Maurice, B., von Bahr, B., Weidema, B., de Beaufort, A.S.H.: Framework for modelling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 6, 127–132 (2001). doi:10.1007/BF02978728
Vose, D.: Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide. John Wiley & Sons (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kumar, T., Mani, M. (2017). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to Assess Energy Neutrality in Occupancy Sensors. In: Chakrabarti, A., Chakrabarti, D. (eds) Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2. ICoRD 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 66. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3520-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3521-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)