Abstract
Sustainability and its assessment are highly critical to industries, governments and even to customers. Every industrial sector, company, individual and even government and different nations have sustainability goals and commitments. It is inevitable to measure the level of sustainability achievement by all these above-mentioned players and for this, a tool to assess sustainability is highly desirable. Assessment of sustainability is an important topic in any field. Choosing a right tool to suit the needs of different players in the field of sustainability is very much crucial. As mentioned in earlier chapter, sustainability focuses on three major elements namely environmental, economic and social aspects and any assessment technique needs to focus on this triple-line thinking. Sustainability can be assessed for a product/process, project and also for a sector and a country. Assessment tools are classified by various ways. Various authors have classified these tools in various ways according to the ruler/scale/method. Not all tools can be used for textiles and clothing supply chain, and some of the tools are highly evident to assess the sustainability of textile products. This chapter deals with various sustainability tools and their implications in textile industry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Recommendations for Further Study
Atkinson GD, Dubourg R, Hamilton K, Munasignhe M, Pearce DW, Young C (1997) Measuring sustainable development: macroeconomics and the environment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
BogenstGatter U (2000) Prediction and optimisation of life-cycle costs in early design. Build Res Inf 28(5/6):376–386
Bohringer C, Jochem PEP (2007) Measuring the immeasurable—a survey of sustainability indices. Ecol Econ 63:1–8
Bossel H (1999) Indicators for sustainable development: theory, method, applications. A report to the Balaton Group. IISD, Canada
Dreyer L, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97
Hermann BG, Kroeze C, Jawjit W (2007) Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performance indicators. J Clean Prod 15:1787–1796
Jørgensen A (2013) Social LCA-a way ahead? Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:296–299
Norris GR (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles-towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1)(Special Issue):97–104
Warren JL, Weitz KA (1994) Development of an integrated life-cycle cost assessment model. IEEE, New York, pp 155–163
Weidema BP (2006) The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1)(Special Issue):89–96 (CrossRef)
References
Australian Standard AS/NZS 4536:1999, Life Cycle Costing: An Application Guide, Reconfirmed on 2014
Bebbington J, Brown J, Frame B (2007) Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models. Ecol Econ 61:224–236
CSD (2001) Indicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies. Commission on Sustainable Development, New York, USA. http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/indisd/indisd-mg2001.pdf
EPA (1993) Life cycle design guidance manual: environmental requirements and product system. EPA-600-R-92-226, 1993, pp 122–129
Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2(10):3309–3322. Open access doi:10.3390/su2103309
Gasparatosa A, Scolobig A (2012) Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool. Ecol Econ 80:1–7
Henn CL (1993) The new economics of life cycle thinking. IEEE, New York
ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework
Klöpffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–95
Life Cycle Analysis, obtained from: http://www.gdrc.org/sustdev/concepts/17-lca.html. Accessed 10 Aug 2015
Life Cycle Costing, Better Practice Guide, Australian National Audit Office, December 2011, Obtained from: http://www.anao.gov.au/uploads/documents/Life_Cycle_Costing.pdf
Life Cycle Costing—Fact Sheet, European Commission Green Public Procurement (GPP) Training Toolkit—Module 1: Managing GPP Implementation, Toolkit developed for the European Commission by ICLEI—Local Governments for Sustainability, 2008, European Commission, DG Environment-G2, B-1049, Bruxelles
Mungcharoen T (2013) Approach on Life Cycle Costing and Benefits, Regional Workshop: Green Public Procurement and Eco-labeling, 1 May 2013 at Phuket, Thailand Organized by PCD, GIZ in collaboration with TEI, FTI, TGO & UNEP. http://www.thai-german-cooperation.info/download/201305_ecolabel_1530_thamrongrut_LCC.pdf
Muthu SS (2014) Assessing the environmental impact of textiles and the clothing supply chain, 1st edn. Woodhead Publishing (March 2014)
Muthu SS (2015a) Handbook of life cycle assessment (LCA) of textiles and clothing, 1st edn. Woodhead Publishing (July 2015)
Muthu SS (2015b) Social life cycle assessment—an insight. Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
Ness B, Urbel Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L (2007) Categorising tools FOS sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ 60:498–508
Publications of the European Platform of LCA Including the ILCD Handbook; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2010. http://lct.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications
Rorarius J (2007) Existing assessment tools and indicators: building up sustainability assessment. Some perspectives and future applications for Finland. Finland’s Ministry of Environment, Report
Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA), Life Cycle Initiative, obtained from: http://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/starting-life-cycle-thinking/life-cycle-approaches/social-lca/
Spitzer M, Elwood H (1995) An introduction to environmental accounting as a business management tool: key concepts and terms. EPA, Washington, DC
Spitzer M, Pojasek R, Robertaccio F, Nelson J (1993) Accounting and capital budgeting for pollution prevention. United States Environmental Protection Agency. In: The engineering foundation conference, 24–29 Jan 1993, San Diego, CA
Štreimikienė D, Girdzijauskas S, Stoškus L (2009) Sustainability assessment methods and their application to harmonization of policies and sustainability monitoring. Environ Res Eng Manag 2(48):51–62
UNEP Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Accessed from http://www.unep.org/pdf/DTIE_PDFS/DTIx1164xPA-guidelines_sLCA.pdf
UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative (2011) Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Making informed choices on products. ISBN: 978-92-807-3175-0
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Muthu, S.S. (2017). Evaluation of Sustainability in Textile Industry. In: Muthu, S. (eds) Sustainability in the Textile Industry. Textile Science and Clothing Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2639-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2639-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2638-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2639-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)