Skip to main content

Partial State Feedback Correction for Smoothing Navigational Parameters

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2016 Proceedings: Volume II

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 389))

Abstract

When an inertial navigation system regains a valid aiding navigation signal after a long-term outage, normal state feedback correction in the Kalman filter (KF) will cause a large instantaneous jump in the navigation parameters which may severely affect flight control stability. In this paper, we present a partial state feedback correction method in the KF to smooth the navigation parameters to solve this problem. The idea is to partially correct the navigation state in several steps according to the requirement of the guidance and control system. The simplicity of this method lies in the fact that no additional changes of the filter parameters are needed in the algorithm. The capability of residual monitoring and fault detection is the same with normal state feedback correction in the KF. Comparative simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zolghadri A, Henry D, Cieslak J, Efimov D, Goupil P (2013) Fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant control and guidance for aerospace vehicles: from theory to application. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Farrell J (2008) Aided navigation: GPS with high rate sensors. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Quan W, Li J, Gong X, Fang J (2015) INS/CNS/GNSS integrated navigation technology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spacecraft Reentry Communications Blackout. http://www.spaceacademy.net.au/spacelink/blackout.htm. Accessed 15 Dec 2015

  5. Maybeck PS (1979) Stochastic models, estimation, and control, vol 1. Academic press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Qin Y, Zhang H, Wang S (2012) Theory of Kalman filtering and integrated navigation. Northwestern Polytechnical University Press

    Google Scholar 

  7. Qin Y (2006) Inertial navigation. Press of Science, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenbo Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

  1. 1.

    \( \widehat{X}_{k/k - 1} + \delta \widehat{X}_{k/k - 1 } \) in partial feedback and total feedback is equal.

Proof

Equation (4) can be simplified as

$$ \widehat{X}_{k/k - 1} = \widehat{X}_{k - 1} + \left( {f\left( {\widehat{X}_{k - 1} } \right) + B_{k} u_{k} } \right)\Delta T $$

Since \( f(x) \) can be linearized as

$$ f\left( X \right) = f\left( {\widehat{X}} \right) + F\delta X $$

where \( F \) is a Jacobian matrix. \( \Phi \) in Eq. (5) can be simplified by

$$ \Phi = (I + F\Delta T) $$

Case 1: Partial feedback (PF),

$$ \begin{aligned} \widehat{X}_{k - 1} & = \widehat{X}_{k - 1/k - 2}^{\text{PF}} + D_{k} \delta \widehat{X}_{k - 1}^{r} \\ \widehat{X}_{k/k - 1} + \delta \widehat{X}_{k/k - 1 } & = \widehat{X}_{k - 1} + f\left( {\widehat{X}_{k - 1} + B_{k} u_{k} } \right)\Delta T + (I + F\Delta T)(I - D_{k} )\delta \widehat{X}_{k - 1}^{r} \\ & = \widehat{X}_{k - 1/k - 2}^{\text{PF}} + D_{k} \delta \widehat{X}_{k - 1}^{r} + \left[ {f(\widehat{X}_{k - 1/k - 2}^{\text{PF}} ) + B_{k} u_{k} + FD_{k} \delta \widehat{X}_{k - 1}^{r} } \right]\Delta T \\ & \quad + \left( {I + F\Delta T} \right)\left( {I - D_{k} } \right)\delta \widehat{X}_{k - 1}^{r} \\ & = \widehat{X}_{k - 1/k - 2}^{\text{PF}} + \delta \widehat{X}_{k - 1}^{{r,{\text{PF}}}} + \left[ {f(\widehat{X}_{k - 1/k - 2}^{PF} ) + B_{k} u_{k} } \right]\Delta T \\ \end{aligned} $$
(A.1)

Case 2: Total feedback (TF),

$$ \begin{aligned} \widehat{X}_{k/k - 1} + \delta \widehat{X}_{k/k - 1 } & = \widehat{X}_{k - 1} + f\left( {\widehat{X}_{k - 1} + B_{k} u_{k} } \right)\Delta T \\ & = \widehat{X}_{k - 1/k - 2}^{\text{TF}} + \delta \widehat{X}_{k - 1}^{{r,{\text{TF}}}} + \left[ {f(\widehat{X}_{k - 1/k - 2}^{\text{TF}} + \delta \widehat{X}_{k - 1}^{{r,{\text{TF}}}} ) + B_{k} u_{k} } \right]\Delta T \\ \end{aligned} $$
(A.2)

The sum of first two components in (A.1) and (A.2) is equal which are estimated as best as possible in the KF measurement update. Very little difference exists in the third part, since very short time interval is multiplied here. So, (A.1) and (A.2) can be thought as equal.

  1. 2.

    ‘fake’ state covariance matrix \( P_{k}^{f} \) Calculation

Proof

Here we define ‘fake’ error of error state estimation \( \delta \widetilde{X}_{k} \). Based on result of Eq. (23),

$$ \begin{aligned} \delta \widehat{X}_{k} & = \delta X_{k} - D_{k} \delta \widehat{X}_{k} = \delta X_{k} - D_{k} \left[ {\delta \widehat{X}_{k/k - 1 } + K_{k} (H_{k} \delta \widetilde{X}_{k/k - 1 } + v_{k} )} \right] \\ & = (I - D_{k} K_{k} H_{k} )\delta \widetilde{X}_{k/k - 1 } + (I - D_{k} ) \delta \widehat{X}_{k/k - 1 } - D_{k} K_{k} v_{k} \\ \end{aligned} $$

We know \( \delta \widehat{X}_{k/k - 1} \) is the estimate based on the measurement at and before time \( k - 1 \), and \( v_{k} \) is the measurement noise at time \( k \). So \( v_{k} \) is uncorrelated with \( \delta \widetilde{X}_{k/k - 1} \) which equals to \( \delta X_{k} - \delta \widehat{X}_{k/k - 1 } \). Therefore, we have

$$ \begin{aligned} P_{k}^{f} & = E\left[ {\delta \widetilde{X}_{k} \delta \widetilde{X}_{k}^{\text{T}} } \right] \\ & = \left( {I - D_{k} K_{k} H_{k} } \right)P_{k/k - 1} \left( {I - D_{k} K_{k} H_{k} } \right)^{\text{T}} \\ & \quad + \left( {I - D_{k} } \right)\left( {\widehat{X}_{k/k - 1} \widehat{X}_{k/k - 1}^{T} } \right)\left( {I - D_{k} } \right)^{\text{T}} + D_{k} K_{k} R_{k} K_{k}^{\text{T}} D_{k}^{\text{T}} \\ \end{aligned} $$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liu, Z., El-Sheimy, N., Qin, Y., Yu, C., Zhang, J. (2016). Partial State Feedback Correction for Smoothing Navigational Parameters. In: Sun, J., Liu, J., Fan, S., Wang, F. (eds) China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2016 Proceedings: Volume II. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 389. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0937-2_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0937-2_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0936-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0937-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics