Abstract
In this chapter, we examine the performance of male and female students participating in a unique and successful high school programme called Keys to Financial Success. After carefully discussing the programme’s characteristics, curriculum and teacher training, we examine the Financial Fitness for Life High School Test (FFFL-HS) results from 965 students enrolled in a one-semester Keys course and discover no gender gap at the overall pre-test level. We find, however, a significant gender gap favouring female students at the overall post-test level, a finding consistent with the results from the norming of the FFFL-HS Test.
The views expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia or the Federal Reserve System.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
While K-12 teachers are formally trained for 30 hours during the summer, the Keys authors and project directors remain in contact with the different cohorts during the academic year to provide the teachers with ongoing pedagogical and content support. Supplemental lessons and materials are provided to teachers throughout the year via email, and additional professional development is offered after school one evening every spring to ensure that teachers remain current in the pedagogical content knowledge related to personal finance.
- 2.
For details on the norming of the FFFL-HS Test see Walstad and Rebeck (2005).
- 3.
A separate analysis was conducted to examine whether the mean gain in the Keys students’ personal finance knowledge from pre- to post-test, as measured by the difference in FFFL-HS Test scores, was different for males and females. Overall, female KEYS students gained 25.95 percentage points between the pre-test and the post-test as compared to their male counterparts who gained 24.58 percentage points. This difference is statistically significant at the 1 % level. In the Income standard, female KEYS students exhibited a 2.43 percentage point larger gain from pre-test to post-test than their male counterparts (females gained 27.42 percentage points and males gained 24.99 percentage points.) This difference is statistically significant at the 5 % level. In the Credit standard, female KEYS students gained 29.46 percentage points from pre-test to post-test, while their male counterparts gained 26.15 percentage points. This difference is statistically significant at the 1 % level. However, for the Money Management and Saving and Investing standards, the gains exhibited by females from pre-test to post-test were not statistically different than the gains exhibited by their male counterparts. At the more disaggregated concept level, the differences between the pre-test to post-test gains exhibited by the males and the females in the Keys sample were not statistically significant. Together, these results reveal some evidence that while both male and female students gain substantially from pre-test to post-test in their personal finance knowledge, the Keys to Financial Success course overall seems to have a larger effect on the knowledge of female students.
References
Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95–135.
Allgood, S., & Walstad, W. B. (1999). The longitudinal effects of economic education on teachers and their students. Journal of Economic Education, 30(2), 99–111.
Asarta, C. J., Hill, A. T., & Meszaros, B. (2014). The features and effectiveness of the keys to financial success curriculum. International Review of Economics Education, 16(1), 39–50.
Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 241–247.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Bosshardt, W., & Watts, M. (1990). Instructor effects and their determinants in precollege economic education. Journal of Economic Education, 21(3), 265–276.
Bosshardt, W., & Watts, M. (1994). Instructor effects in economics in elementary and junior high schools. Journal of Economic Education, 25(3), 195–211.
Butters, R. B., Asarta, C. J., & Fischer, T. (2011). Human capital in the classroom: the role of teacher knowledge in economic literacy. The American Economist, 56(2), 47–57.
Butters, R. B., Asarta, C. J., & McCoy, S. (2012). Financial literacy and gender in U.S. high schools. Journal of Economic and Financial Education, 11(2), 142–149.
Caldwell, J., Davis, J., Gallagher, S., Lopus, J., Morton, J., Schug, M., et al. (2004). Learning, earning and investing: High School. New York: National Council on Economic Education.
Cochrane, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An interactive model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–272.
Danes, S. M., & Haberman, H. R. (2007). Teen financial knowledge, self-efficacy, and behavior: A gendered view. Financial Counseling and Planning, 18(2), 48–60.
Fox, J., Bartholomae, S., & Lee, J. (2005). Building the case for financial education. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 195–214.
Garet, M., Porter A., Desimone L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
Gellman, S., & Laux, S. (2011). Financial fitness for life (Grades 9–12) (2nd ed.). New York: Council for Economic Education.
Hanna, M. E., Hill, R. R., & Perdue, G. (2010). School of study and financial literacy. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 11(3), 29–37.
Harter, C., & Harter, J. (2009). Assessing the effectiveness of Financial Fitness for Life in Eastern Kentucky. Journal of Applied Economic Policy, 28(1), 20–33.
Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.
Jacobs, F. (1988). The five-tiered approach to evaluation: Context and implementation. In H. Weiss & F. Jacobs (Eds.), Evaluating family programs (pp. 36–68). New York: Aldine DeGruyter.
Jump$tart Coalition. (2002). National Standards in K-12 Personal Finance Education. Accessed November 15, 2014, Available from: http://jumpstart.org/national-standards.html.
Lusardi, A., Mitchell, O. S., & Curto, V. (2009). Financial literacy among the young: Evidence and implications for consumer policy. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper No. 15352. Accessed November 20, 2014, Available from http://www.nber.org/papers/w15352
Mandell, L., & Klein, L. (2007). Motivation and financial literacy. Financial Services Review, 16(2), 105–116.
National Council on Economic Education (NCEE). (1997). Voluntary national content standards in economics. New York: National Council on Economic Education.
Ost, B. (2014). How do teachers improve? The relative importance of specific and general human capital. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(2), 127–151.
Roberts, H., Sorgman, M., & Parkison, K. (2010). Surveying the importance of economics and financial literacy descriptors. Journal of Applied Business and Management Studies, 1(2), 1–18.
Rockoff, J. E. (2004). Impact of individual teachers on student achievement: evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.
Schug, M., & Morton, J. (2001). Financial fitness for life: bringing home the gold teacher guide (grades 9–12). New York: National Council on Economic Education.
Schulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Schulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Swinton, J. R., Scafidi, B., & Woodard, H. C. (2012). The impact of the Teaching High School Economics workshop for teachers on student achievement. Eastern Economic Journal, 38(3), 401–416.
Tennyson, S., & Nguyen, C. (2001). State curriculum mandates and student knowledge of personal finance. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(2), 241–262.
Varcoe, K. P., Martin, A., Devitto, Z., & Go, C. (2005). Using a financial education curriculum for teens. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 16(1), 63–71.
VISA (2000). Practical Money Skills for Life. San Francisco: VISA, U.S.A., Inc.
Walstad, W. B., & Rebeck, K. (2005). Financial fitness for life: High school test examiner’s manual (grades 9–12). New York: Council for Economic Education.
Walstad, W. B., Rebeck, K., & MacDonald, R. A. (2010). The effects of financial education on the financial knowledge of high school students. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44(2), 336–357.
Way, W. L., & Holden, K. C. (2009). Teachers’ background and capacity to teach personal finance: Results from a national study. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 20(2), 64–78.
Weaver, A. M., Deaton, W. L., & Reach, S. A. (1987) The effects of economic education summer institutes for teachers on the achievement of their students. Journal of Educational Research, 80(5), 296–300.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hill, A.T., Asarta, C.J. (2016). Gender and Student Achievement in Personal Finance: Evidence from Keys to Financial Success . In: Aprea, C., et al. International Handbook of Financial Literacy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0360-8_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0360-8_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0358-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0360-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)