Abstract
Experience suggests that cross-sector partnerships can turn out to be a big disappointment: a cozy talking shop with plenty of warm words but not a lot of action to show for it. The Mersey Basin Campaign, however, was a major exception. As a government-sponsored 25-year initiative to clean up the rivers, canals, and estuary of the Mersey River Basin in North West England, the Campaign was a pioneer in public-private-voluntary partnership working and, in the period it was active (1985–2010), made great progress in improving water quality, promoting waterside regeneration, and engaging stakeholders, in a region with a history of severe industrial dereliction and pollution. In this paper, by a former leader of the Campaign, a number of themes are explored: Why was a Campaign needed? What did it try to achieve? How did it do this? What particularly factors led to successful partnership working?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Royal Commission on the Prevention of Pollution of Rivers sat over the period 1864–1873, took evidence from industrialists located alongside the Mersey and the Irwell, and produced a series of reports and recommendations. See Elworthy and Holder (1997).
- 2.
- 3.
The River Ribble catchment was added to the Campaign area in the late 1990s at the request of the environmental regulator, the Environment Agency. The agency was keen to ensure that the improvements in water quality, starting to be felt in the Mersey catchment, were extended to the Ribble.
- 4.
At the time, there was no environmental program for water quality improvements: that would not come until water privatization in 1989 and the introduction of 5-year asset management plans (see Gregory 2012).
- 5.
The Healthy Waterways Trust continues to this day (http://www.healthywaterwaystrust.org.uk/), fulfilling some of the Campaign’s role in a more low key way. Since 2010 much of its activity has focused on mediation in relation to the maintenance of water quality standards in some of the most sensitive locations in the Mersey Basin, e.g., Salford Quays, a major site for waterside regeneration.
- 6.
See I. Gilfoyle (2000) “Memories of the Mersey Basin Campaign,” available at: http://www.merseybasin.org.uk/archive/assets/244/original/Memories_of_MBC_by_Ian_Gilfoyle.pdf
- 7.
The Campaign’s final Corporate Plan, for 2009–2010, is available at: http://www.merseybasin.org.uk/archive/assets/53/original/53_mbc_CORPORATE_PLAN_2009-10.pdf
- 8.
For detailed evidence of the impact of the Campaign, see: Handley et al. (1997), Jones (2000), (2006), and EKOS Consulting (2006). All of these documents may be found on the Mersey Basin Campaign Legacy Website: http://www.merseybasin.org.uk/
References
Batey PWJ (2009) Comment: there may be no more Mersey basin campaign after 2010, but part of its legacy should be the innovative geographical notion on which it was founded. SourceNW 20:26
Department of the Environment (DoE) (1983) Letter from Michael Heseltine and Government Consultation Paper
EKOS Consulting (2006) Evaluation of the Mersey basin campaign; report to the government office north west. EKOS Consulting, Manchester
Elworthy S, Holder J (1997) Environmental protection: text and materials. Butterworths, London
Gregory CE (2012) Enabling sustainable river futures: exploring institutional interventions. PhD thesis, University of Auckland. Available at: https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/19480
Handley JF, Wood R, Kidd SJ (1997) Building a healthier economy through a cleaner environment: mid-term report. Mersey Basin Campaign, Manchester
Jones PD (2000) The Mersey Estuary: back from the dead? Solving a 150-year old problem. J Chart Inst Water Environ Manag 14:124–130
Jones PD (2006) Water quality and fisheries in the Mersey Estuary, England: a historical perspective. Mar Pollut Bull 53:144–154
Kidd SJ, Shaw D (2000) The Mersey Basin and its River Valley Initiatives: an appropriate model for the management of rivers? Local Environ 5:199–209
Kim JS, Batey PWJ (2001) A collaborative partnership approach to integrated waterside revitalization: the Mersey Basin Campaign, North West England. Int J Public Priv Partnerships 3:145–150
Menzies W (2008) The river that changed the world. In: Scheibenbogen S (ed) River journeys. International Riverfoundation, Brisbane, pp 12–15
Menzies W (2010) Partnership: no one said it would be easy. Town Plan Rev 81(4):1–7
Mersey Basin Campaign (1986) Mersey Basin Campaign: new life for the North West, unpublished document
Mersey Basin Campaign (1995) First Periodic Report: changing for the better. Mersey Basin Campaign, Manchester
Newson MD (2009) Land, water and development, 3rd edn. Routledge, London
Petts G, Heathcote J, Martin D (eds) (2002) Urban rivers: our inheritance and future. IWA Publishing, London
Watson N (2005) The management of British rivers. In: Owen S, Pooley C, Folkard A, Park C, Clark G, Watson N (eds) Rivers and the British landscape. Carnegie, Lancaster, pp 169–194
Wood R, Handley JF, Kidd SJ (1999) Sustainable development and institutional design: the example of the Mersey Basin Campaign. J Environ Plan Manag 43:341–354
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Batey, P. (2017). How Can Cross-Sector Partnerships Be Made to Work Successfully? Lessons from the Mersey Basin Campaign (1985–2010). In: Shibusawa, H., Sakurai, K., Mizunoya, T., Uchida, S. (eds) Socioeconomic Environmental Policies and Evaluations in Regional Science. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 24. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0099-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0099-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0097-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0099-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)