Skip to main content

How Can Cross-Sector Partnerships Be Made to Work Successfully? Lessons from the Mersey Basin Campaign (1985–2010)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Socioeconomic Environmental Policies and Evaluations in Regional Science

Part of the book series: New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives ((NFRSASIPER,volume 24))

Abstract

Experience suggests that cross-sector partnerships can turn out to be a big disappointment: a cozy talking shop with plenty of warm words but not a lot of action to show for it. The Mersey Basin Campaign, however, was a major exception. As a government-sponsored 25-year initiative to clean up the rivers, canals, and estuary of the Mersey River Basin in North West England, the Campaign was a pioneer in public-private-voluntary partnership working and, in the period it was active (1985–2010), made great progress in improving water quality, promoting waterside regeneration, and engaging stakeholders, in a region with a history of severe industrial dereliction and pollution. In this paper, by a former leader of the Campaign, a number of themes are explored: Why was a Campaign needed? What did it try to achieve? How did it do this? What particularly factors led to successful partnership working?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Royal Commission on the Prevention of Pollution of Rivers sat over the period 1864–1873, took evidence from industrialists located alongside the Mersey and the Irwell, and produced a series of reports and recommendations. See Elworthy and Holder (1997).

  2. 2.

    For further information about river management policy in the UK, see Watson (2005), Newson (2009), and Gregory (2012).

  3. 3.

    The River Ribble catchment was added to the Campaign area in the late 1990s at the request of the environmental regulator, the Environment Agency. The agency was keen to ensure that the improvements in water quality, starting to be felt in the Mersey catchment, were extended to the Ribble.

  4. 4.

    At the time, there was no environmental program for water quality improvements: that would not come until water privatization in 1989 and the introduction of 5-year asset management plans (see Gregory 2012).

  5. 5.

    The Healthy Waterways Trust continues to this day (http://www.healthywaterwaystrust.org.uk/), fulfilling some of the Campaign’s role in a more low key way. Since 2010 much of its activity has focused on mediation in relation to the maintenance of water quality standards in some of the most sensitive locations in the Mersey Basin, e.g., Salford Quays, a major site for waterside regeneration.

  6. 6.

    See I. Gilfoyle (2000) “Memories of the Mersey Basin Campaign,” available at: http://www.merseybasin.org.uk/archive/assets/244/original/Memories_of_MBC_by_Ian_Gilfoyle.pdf

  7. 7.

    The Campaign’s final Corporate Plan, for 2009–2010, is available at: http://www.merseybasin.org.uk/archive/assets/53/original/53_mbc_CORPORATE_PLAN_2009-10.pdf

  8. 8.

    For detailed evidence of the impact of the Campaign, see: Handley et al. (1997), Jones (2000), (2006), and EKOS Consulting (2006). All of these documents may be found on the Mersey Basin Campaign Legacy Website: http://www.merseybasin.org.uk/

References

  • Batey PWJ (2009) Comment: there may be no more Mersey basin campaign after 2010, but part of its legacy should be the innovative geographical notion on which it was founded. SourceNW 20:26

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment (DoE) (1983) Letter from Michael Heseltine and Government Consultation Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • EKOS Consulting (2006) Evaluation of the Mersey basin campaign; report to the government office north west. EKOS Consulting, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Elworthy S, Holder J (1997) Environmental protection: text and materials. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory CE (2012) Enabling sustainable river futures: exploring institutional interventions. PhD thesis, University of Auckland. Available at: https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/19480

  • Handley JF, Wood R, Kidd SJ (1997) Building a healthier economy through a cleaner environment: mid-term report. Mersey Basin Campaign, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones PD (2000) The Mersey Estuary: back from the dead? Solving a 150-year old problem. J Chart Inst Water Environ Manag 14:124–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones PD (2006) Water quality and fisheries in the Mersey Estuary, England: a historical perspective. Mar Pollut Bull 53:144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd SJ, Shaw D (2000) The Mersey Basin and its River Valley Initiatives: an appropriate model for the management of rivers? Local Environ 5:199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JS, Batey PWJ (2001) A collaborative partnership approach to integrated waterside revitalization: the Mersey Basin Campaign, North West England. Int J Public Priv Partnerships 3:145–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzies W (2008) The river that changed the world. In: Scheibenbogen S (ed) River journeys. International Riverfoundation, Brisbane, pp 12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzies W (2010) Partnership: no one said it would be easy. Town Plan Rev 81(4):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mersey Basin Campaign (1986) Mersey Basin Campaign: new life for the North West, unpublished document

    Google Scholar 

  • Mersey Basin Campaign (1995) First Periodic Report: changing for the better. Mersey Basin Campaign, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Newson MD (2009) Land, water and development, 3rd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Petts G, Heathcote J, Martin D (eds) (2002) Urban rivers: our inheritance and future. IWA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson N (2005) The management of British rivers. In: Owen S, Pooley C, Folkard A, Park C, Clark G, Watson N (eds) Rivers and the British landscape. Carnegie, Lancaster, pp 169–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood R, Handley JF, Kidd SJ (1999) Sustainable development and institutional design: the example of the Mersey Basin Campaign. J Environ Plan Manag 43:341–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Batey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Batey, P. (2017). How Can Cross-Sector Partnerships Be Made to Work Successfully? Lessons from the Mersey Basin Campaign (1985–2010). In: Shibusawa, H., Sakurai, K., Mizunoya, T., Uchida, S. (eds) Socioeconomic Environmental Policies and Evaluations in Regional Science. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 24. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0099-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0099-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0097-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0099-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics