Skip to main content

Digital Technologies in Teacher Education

From Mythologies to Making

  • Chapter
Building Bridges

Abstract

Noted historian of technology Melvin Kranzberg (1986) once remarked that while technology is neither good nor bad, it is also not neutral. Unfortunately, the use of educational technologies in teacher education has often been framed in an inherently positive way (Selwyn, 2011), with little attention paid to how future teachers might develop a sense of technology beyond a specific device.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The new industrial revolution. Toronto, ON: Signal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, A. (1997). Ideas and objects: The arts and crafts movement in Britain. Design Issues, 13(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M. B. (2010). Shop class as soulcraft: An inquiry into the value of work. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, F. (2005). La représentation par les enseignants, quant à leurs profils de compétences relatives à l’ordinateur: vers une théorie des TIC en éducation. La Revue Canadienne de L’apprentissage et de La Technologie, 31(1), 27–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, F., Lacasse, R., & Bélair, L. (2001). Toward a definition of four orders of competency for the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in education. In Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education (pp. 213–217). Banff, Alberta: ACTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoban, G. F. (2007). Using slowmation to engage preservice elementary teachers in understanding science content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(2), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teacher’s guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honey, M., & Kanter, D. (2013). Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16(1), 13–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K. (2015, June 12). MOOC completion rates: The data. Retrieved from http://www.katyjordan.com/MOOCproject.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M. S., & Levine, P. B. (2015). Early childhood education by MOOC: Lessons from Sesame Street (NBER Working Paper 21229). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w21229

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kranzberg, M. (1986). Technology and history: “Kranzberg’s Laws.” Technology and Culture, 27(3), 544–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugh, M. (2014). Joy in labour: The politicization of craft from the arts and crafts movement to Etsy. Canadian Review of American Studies, 44(2), 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2007). Beginning to understand teaching as a discipline. Studying Teacher Education, 3(2), 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munby, H., & Russell, T. (1994). The authority of experience in learning to teach: Messages from a physics methods class. Journal of Teacher Education, 4(2), 86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology, Part I: A history of instructional media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2011). Editorial: In praise of pessimism–the need for negativity in educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 713–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2012). Ten suggestions for improving academic research in education and technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 213–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. (2014). Exploring the usage of ICT and YouTube for teaching: A study of pre-service teachers in Hong Kong. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(1), 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. (2013). We need a fixer (not just a maker) movement. Wired Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/06/qq_thompson/

    Google Scholar 

  • Triggs, O. L. (2009). Arts & crafts movement. New York, NY: Parkstone International.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bullock, S. (2016). Digital Technologies in Teacher Education. In: Kosnik, C., White, S., Beck, C., Marshall, B., Goodwin, A.L., Murray, J. (eds) Building Bridges. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-491-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-491-6_1

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-491-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics