Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Agencification Challenges in Higher Education Quality Assurance

  • Chapter
The Transformation of University Institutional and Organizational Boundaries

Part of the book series: Higher Education Research in the 21st Century Series ((CHER))

Abstract

The 1990s were characterized by the rise of quality assurance in higher education (Dill, 1995). Over the last two decades, quality assurance systems in Europe have changed and evolved significantly. There is now much variety in how countries regulate academic quality (Dill & Beerkens, 2010; Schwartz & Westerheijden, 2007), but despite of the variety we can see increasing convergence in the organizational structure that countries use for quality assurance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2011). Understanding regulation: Theory, strategy, and practice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beerkens, M. (2015). Quality assurance in the political context: In the midst of different expectations and conflicting goals. Quality in Higher Education (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Better Regulation Taskforce. (2000). Higher education: Easing the burden. Retrieved from http://archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/brc/publications/2002.html

  • Blackmur, D. (2008). The public regulation of Higher Education qualities: Rationale, processes and outcomes. In D. F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, & M. João Rosa (Eds.), Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., Hostaker, R., & Vabo, A. (2000). Policy and practice in higher education: Reforming Norwegian universities. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G., & Verhoest, K. (2010). The coordination of public sector organizations: Shifting patterns of public management. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., & Williams, R. (2007). Accreditation and related regulatory matters in the United Kingdom. In S. Schwarz & D. F. Westerheijden (Eds.), Accreditation and evaluation in the European higher education area. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., & Lӕgreid, P. (Eds.). (2006). Autonomy and regulation: Copying with agencies in the modern state. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., Lie, A., & Lӕgreid, P. (2007). Still fragmented government or reassertion of the center. In T. Christensen & P. Lӕgreid (Eds.), Transcending new public management: the transformation of public sector reform. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • De staatssecretaris van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap. (2011). Beleidsreactie op de eindrapporten alternatieve afstudeertrajecten. aan de voorzitter van de Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal. 20 mei 2011. Retrieved from http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/kamerstukken/2011/05/20/beleidsreactie-op-de-eindrapporten-alternatieve-afstudeertrajecten.html

  • Dill, D. D. (1995). Through Deming’s eyes: A cross-national analysis of quality assurance policies in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 1(1), 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. D. (2010). Quality assurance in higher education: Practices and issues. In B. McGaw, E. Baker, & P. P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Elsevier Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. D., & Beerkens, M. (Eds.). (2010). Public policies for academic quality: Analyses of innovative policy instruments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. D., & Beerkens, M. (2013). Designing the framework conditions for assuring academic standards: Lessons learned about professional, market, and government regulation of academic quality. Higher Education, 65(3), 341–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. D., & Soo, M. (2004). Transparency and quality in higher education markets. In P. Teixeira, B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reality? Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DUB. (2014). Tweede Kamer: keuringsstelsel hoger onderwijs functioneert prima. Retrieved September 4, 2014, from http://www.dub.uu.nl/artikel/nieuws/tweede-kamer-keuringsstelsel-hoger-onderwijsfunctioneert-prima.html

  • Enders, J., & Westerheijden, D. (2011). Policies for quality in higher education – coordination and consistency in EU-policymaking 2000–2010. European Journal of Higher Education, 1(4), 297–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ENQA. (2003). Quality procedures in European higher education: An ENQA survey. ENQA Occasional Papers 5. Retrieved from http://enqa.eu/files/procedures.pdf

  • ENQA. (2005). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area. Retrieved from http://www.enqa.eu/files/ENQA%20Bergen%20Report.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • ENQA. (2008). Quality procedures in the European higher education area and beyond: Second ENQA survey. ENQA Occasional Papers 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENQA / Danish Centre for Quality Assurance and Evaluation. (1998). Evaluation of European higher education: A status report of 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P. (2008). The “quality game”: External review and institutional reaction over three decades in the United States. In D. F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, & M. João Rosa (Eds.), Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Explanatory Notes to the Draft Bill on the Accreditation Agency for Higher Education (The Accreditation Act). L294 – Explanatory. Retrieved from http://acedenmark.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/dokumenter/Engelske_tekster/Engelsk_oversaettelse_af_bemaerkninger_til_Akkrediteringsloven.pdf

  • Frazer, M. (1992). Quality assurance in higher education. In A. Z. Craft (Ed.), Quality assurance in higher education. London, UK: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEFCE. (2012). A risk-based approach to quality assurance: Outcomes of consultation and next steps. Retrieved October 27, 2012, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2012/201227/Risk-based%20quality%20assurance%20consultation%20outcomes.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., Scott, C., James, O., Jones, G., & Travers, T. (1999). Regulation inside government: Waste-watchers, quality police, and sleaze-busters. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J. (2003). Institutional reform in higher education: Forever changes? In B. Denters, O. van Heffen, J. Huisman, & P.-J. Klok (Eds.), Interactive governance and market mechanisms. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J., & Toonen, T. (2004). Higher education and university research in the Netherlands: A mixed pattern of control. In C. Hood, O. James, B. G. Peters, & C. Scott (Eds.), Controlling modern government: Variety, commonality and change. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeliazkova, M., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2004). The Netherlands: A leader in quality assurance follows the accreditation trend. In S. Schwarz & D. F. Westerheijden (Eds.), Accreditation and evaluation in the European higher education area. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lӕgreid, P., & Verhoest, K. (2010). Introduction: Reforming public sector organizations. In P. Lӕgreid & K. Verhoest (Eds.), Governance of public sector organizations: Proliferation, autonomy and performance. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Maxmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Langfeldt, L., Harvey, L., Huisman, J., Westerheijden, D., & Stensaker, B. (2008). Evaluation of NOKUT – The Norwegian agency for quality assurance in education, Report 2: NOKUT’s national role. Norway, Europe: Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. (2010). The external examiner system in the United Kingdom. In D. D. Dill & M. Beerkens (Eds.), Public policies for academic quality: Analyses of innovative policy instruments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1997). From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministerie van OCW, Ministerie van ELI. (2011). Kwaliteit in verscheidenheid: Strategische Agenda Hoger Onderwijs, Onderzoek en Wetenschap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1988). On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: An overview of recent trends in higher education in Western Europe, 1986–1988. European Journal of Education, 23(1/2), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G., & van Vught, F. (1991). Prometheus bound: The changing relationship between government and higher education in Western Europe. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Talbot, C. (Eds.). (2004). Unbundled government: A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos and contractualisation. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., Bathgate, K., Caulfield, J., Smullen, A., & Talbot, C. (2001). Agency fever? Analysis of an international policy fashion. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 3(3), 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Caufield, J., & Smullen, A. (2004). Agencies: How governments do things through semi-autonomous organizations. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Report of the committee for the review of the Accreditation Organization of The Netherlands and Flanders (NVAO). (2007, September). Retrieved from http://www.enqa.eu/files/NVAO%20review%20report.pdf

  • Santiago, P., Tremblay, K., Basri, E., & Arnal, E. (2008). Tertiary education for the knowledge society: Governance, funding, quality (Vol. 1). Paris, France: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, S., & Westerheijden, D. F. (Eds.). (2007). Accreditation and evaluation in the European higher education area. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B. (1997). From accountability to opportunity: The role of quality assessments in Norway. Quality in Higher Education, 3(3), 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B. (2007). The blurring boundaries between accreditation and audit: The case of Norway. In S. Schwarz & D. F. Westerheijden (Eds.), Accreditationa and evaluation in the European higher education area. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B. (2011). Accreditation of higher education in Europe – moving towards the US model? Journal of Education Policy, 26(6), 757–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, C. (2004). The agency idea: Sometimes old, sometimes new, sometimes borrowed, sometimes untrue. In C. Pollitt & C. Talbot (Eds.), Unbundled government: A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos and contractualisation. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thune, C. (2001). Quality assurance of higher education in Denmark. In D. Dunkerly & W. S. Wong (Eds.), Global perspectives on quality in higher education. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • UUK, HEFCE, GuildHE, DELNI. (2011). Terms of reference for the quality in higher education group. Retrieved from http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/PolicyAndResearch/Guidance/AccommodationCodeofPractice/Documents/QHEG-2011-01a%20terms%20of%20reference.pdf

  • van Vught, F. A., & Westerheijden, D. F. (1994). Towards a general model of quality assessment in higher education. Higher Education, 28(3), 355–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerheijden, D. F. (2008). States and Europe and quality of higher education. In D. F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, & M. João Rosa (Eds.), Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Public Administration, Leiden University, Netherland

    Maarja Beerkens

Authors
  1. Maarja Beerkens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. IRCrES, Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth of National Research Council, Rome, Italy

    Emanuela Reale

  2. IRCrES, Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth of National Research Council, Rome, Italy

    Emilia Primeri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beerkens, M. (2015). Agencification Challenges in Higher Education Quality Assurance. In: Reale, E., Primeri, E. (eds) The Transformation of University Institutional and Organizational Boundaries. Higher Education Research in the 21st Century Series. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-178-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation