Skip to main content

Abstract

As part of social policy regimes, terms such as ‘disengaged’, ‘disadvantaged’, and ‘at-risk’ are used to identify and delineate different populations of young people according to their personal characteristics, relationship to social institutions, and possible educational and labour market futures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andres, L., & J. Wyn. (2010). The making of a generation: The children of the 1970’s in adulthood. Toronto/Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, L., & Lockie, S. (2001). Rural Australia: An introduction. In S. Lockie & L. Bourke (Eds.), Rurality bites. The social and environmental transformation of rural Australia. Annandale: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J. (2007). The country, the city and the state in the Australian settlement. Australian Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 1-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, G. (1991). Peculiar interests: Civil society and governing the system of natural liberty. In The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 151-168). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo, H., & Wyn, J. (2012). Young people making it work. Continuity and change in rural places. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (1998). Administering asceticism: Reworking the ethical life of the unemployed citizen. In M. Dean & B. Hindess (Eds.), Governing Australia: Studies in contemporary rationalities of government (pp. 87-107). Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEECD. (2010). Pathways to re-engagement through flexible learning options. East Melbourne: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrugia, D. (2014). Towards a spatialised youth sociology: The rural and the urban in times of change. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(3), 293-307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrugia, D., Smyth, J., & Harrison, T. (2014). Emplacing young people in an Australian rural community: An extraverted sense of place in times of change. Journal of Youth Studies DOI:10.1080/13676261.2014.901495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrugia, D., Smyth, J., & Harrison, T. (2014). Rural young people in late modernity: Place, globalisation and the spatial contours of identity. Current Sociology DOI: 10.1177/0011392114538959.

    Google Scholar 

  • France, A. (2008). Risk factor analysis and the youth question. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(1), 1-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, P. (2006). The entrepreneurial self and ‘youth at risk’: Exploring the horizons of identity in the 21st century. Journal of Youth Studies, 9(1), 17-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2009). Re-engaging our kids – A framework for education provision to children and young people at risk of disengaging or disengaged from school. Available at: https://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/stuman/wellbeing/Re-engaging_Our_Kids_KPMG_Apr2010.pdf [accessed 04/09/2014]

  • McGregor, G., & Mills, M. (2012). Alternative education sites and marginalised young people: ‘I wish there were more schools like this one.’ International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(8), 843-862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalising space. In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (Eds.), Spaces of neoliberalism. Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe (pp. 33-57). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1991). Governing ‘advanced’ liberal democracies. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism, and rationalities of government (pp. 37-64). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2012). Cities in a world economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (2005). The making of class and gender through visualising moral subject formation. Sociology, 39(5), 965-982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (2011). Imagining personhood differently: Person value and autonomist working-class value practices. The Sociological Review, 59(3), 496-513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., & Hattam, R. (2004). Dropping out, drifting off, being excluded. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., & McInerney, P. (2012). From silent witnesses to active agents: Student voice in re-engaging with learning. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., & McInerney, P. (2014a). Becoming educated: young people’s narratives of disadvantage, class, place and identity New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., & McInerney, P. (2014b). ‘Ordinary kids’ navigating geographies of educational opportunity in the context of an Australian ‘place-based intervention’. Journal of Education Policy, 29(3), 285-301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., McInerney, P., & Fish, T. (2013a). Re-engagement to where? Low SES students in alternative-education programs on the path to low-status destinations? Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 18(1-2), 194-207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., McInerney, P., & Fish, T. (2013b). Blurring the boundaries: From relational learning towards a critical pedagogy of engagement for disengaged disadvantaged young people. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(2), 299-320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., & Robinson, J. (2014). ‘Give me air not shelter’: Critical tales of a policy case of student reengagement from beyond school. Journal of Education Policy, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680930.2014.945965

  • Smyth, J., & Wrigley, T. (2013). Living on the edge: Re-thinking poverty, class and schooling. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • te Riele, K. (2006). Youth ‘at-risk’: Further marginalising the marginalised? Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 129-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • te Riele, K. (2007). Educational alternatives for marginalised youth. The Australian Educational Researcher, 34(3), 53-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Farrugia, D., Smyth, J., Harrison, T. (2015). ‘Vulnerable’, ‘At-Risk’, ‘Disengaged’. In: Riele, K.t., Gorur, R. (eds) Interrogating Conceptions of “Vulnerable Youth” in Theory, Policy and Practice. Innovations and Controversies: Interrogating Educational Change. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-121-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics