Skip to main content

Changes in Policy Related to Early Childhood Education and Care in Australia

The Journey Towards Pedagogical Leadership

  • Chapter
The Future of Educational Research

Part of the book series: Bold Visions in Educational Research ((BVER))

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview and commentary on two decades of policy changes in early childhood education and care (ECEC) in Australia that led to a National Quality Framework (NQF) for ECEC services for children from birth to five years (Council of Australian Governments [COAG], 2009a). It can be argued that the direction of the policy changes has meant that educators in these services have been increasingly asked to adopt pedagogical leadership skills and practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Australian Government. (2007). National agenda for early childhood, Canberra: Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2003). Starting Strong: The persistent division between care and education. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 1(1), 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2007). Results from the OECD thematic review of early childhood education and care policy 1998 – 2006. UNESCO Policy Brief on Early Childhood #41. Paris, France: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Consulting Group. (2008). National early childhood development strategy: Report to the ECD subgroup of the Productivity Agenda Working Group. COAG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauner, J., Gordic, B., & Zigler, E. (2004). Putting the child back into child care: Combining care and education for children ages 3–5. Social Policy Report, 18(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, D. (2007). The ABC of child care politics. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 42(2), 213–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, D. (2008, February). Building an international research collaboration in early childhood education and care: Background materials for a workshop funded by the Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth (ARACY), Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass, B., & Brennan, D. (2003). Taxing women: The politics of gender in the tax/transfer system. eJournal of Tax Research, 1(1), 37–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Child Care Advisory Council. (2001). Child care: Beyond 2001: A report to the Minister for Family and Community Services. Retrieved from http://www.facs.gov.au/internet/facsinternet.nsf/cb54756bd173ecfbca256878000451c7/6d19e2ce9428f364ca256d900018240f/$FILE/beyond2001.pdf

  • Council of Australian Governments. (2009a). Investing in the early years – A national early childhood development strategy. Retrieved from http://www.coag.gov.au/coag_meeting_outcomes/2009-0702/docs/national_ECD_strategy.pdf

  • Council of Australian Governments. (2009b). National partnership agreement on the quality agenda for early childhood education and care. Retrieved from http://acecqa.gov.au/storage/nap_national_quality_agenda_early_childhood_education_care_signature.pdf

  • Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Postmodern perspectives. London, UK: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. (2012). Supporting the development of young children in Australia 2009: A snapshot. Retrieved from http://foi.deewr.gov.au/node/3732

  • Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Barton, ACT: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. (2010a). Educators belonging, being and becoming: Educators’ guide to the early years learning framework for Australia. Barton, ACT: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. (2010b). State of child care in Australia, April, 2010. Canberra: Office of Early Childhood Education and Child Care, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doctors, J. V., Gebhard, B., Jones, L., & Wat, A. (2008). Common vision, different paths: Five states’ journeys toward comprehensive prenatal-to-five systems. Washington, DC: Pre-K Now and ZERO TO THREE. Retrieved from http://www.zerotothree.org/site/DocServer/Common_Vision__Different_Paths_Final.pdf?docID=4521

  • Edwards, S. (2007). From developmental-constructivism to socio-cultural theory and practice: An expansive analysis of teachers’ professional learning in early childhood education. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 5(1), 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, A. (2006). Early childhood education: pathways to quality and equity for all children. Australian Education Review No 50. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, E. (2006). The economic benefits of high-quality early childhood programs: What makes the difference? Washington, DC: The Committee for Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam, W., & Zigler, E. (2001). A critical meta-analysis of all evaluations of state-funded preschool from 1977 to 1998: Implications for policy, service delivery, and program evaluation. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(4), 441–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, D., & Keen, D. (2012). Learner engagement: Has the child been lost in translation? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(3), 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, N. (2007). Child care is not a women’s issue! A feminist analysis of child care subsidy policy. Just Policy, 44, 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, H., Press, F., & Sumsion, J. (2012). The quality imperative: tracing the rise of quality in Australian early childhood education and care policy. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(3), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, P. (2002). Issues in childcare policy in Australia. The Australian Economic Review, 35(2), 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, C. (2011). An analysis of New Zealand’s changing history, policies and approaches to early childhood education. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(3), 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, T. G. (2008). Towards an early years learning framework for Australia, CCCH (working paper 4). Parkville, VIC: Centre for Community Child Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Childcare Accreditation Council. (2006). History of the National Childcare Accreditation Council. Retrieved from http://www.ncac.gov.au/about_ncac/ncac_history.pdf

  • National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. (2008). The timing and quality of early experiences combine to shape brain architecture (working paper #5). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Centre on the Developing Child, Harvard University. Retrieved from http://www.developingchild.net/pubs/wp/Timing_Quality_Early_Experiences.pdf

  • Nuttall, J., & Edwards, S. (2007). Theory, policy and practice: Three contexts for the development of Australia’s early childhood curriculum documents. In L. Keesing Styles & H. Hedges (Eds.), Theorising early childhood practice: Emerging dialogues (pp. 3–26). Castle Hill, NSW: Pademelon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic and Cooperative Development. (2001). Starting strong: Early childhood education and care. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic and Cooperative Development. (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, F. (2008). Trends and debates in ECEC policy: A literature review canvassing policy developments in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Sweden and the United Kingdom. In D. Brennan (Ed.), Building an international research collaboration in early childhood education and care (pp. 1–19). Background materials for a workshop funded by the Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth (ARACY), February 18–19th, Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, F., & Hayes, A. (2000). OECD thematic review of early childhood education and care policy: Australian background report. Sydney, NSW: Department of Education Training and Youth Affairs, Department of Family and Community Services, Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Curriculum Assessment Authority. (2008). Analysis of curriculum/learning frameworks for the early years (birth to age 8). East Melbourne, VIC: Victorian Curriculum Assessment Authority.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nailon, D., Beswick, K. (2014). Changes in Policy Related to Early Childhood Education and Care in Australia. In: The Future of Educational Research. Bold Visions in Educational Research. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-512-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics