Abstract
The process of interpreting how collaborative groups make sense of science in informal learning and teaching contexts such as museums has been actively studied for the past few decades. Studies often focus on the science content that is learned or the ways in which content is taught. Such studies also largely focus on the typical European-American public that predominantly populate museums and other informal places of learning. The research we describe in this chapter disrupts these patterns; our research has actively explored scientific sense making from the point of view of the learners, who, in our study, were all ethnically diverse families with children in a nearby school serving culturally and linguistically diverse students. As in the other chapters in this volume, we focus here on the twists and changes of methods with time that made our research possible. We start with a short vignette, in order to introduce some of the themes we will advance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Borun M, Dritsas J, Johnson J, Peter N, Wagner N, Fadigan K, Jangaard A, Stroup E, Wegner A. Family learning in museum: The PISEC perspective. Philadelphia, PA: Franklin Institute; 1998.
Brown AL, Ash D, Rutherford M, Nakagawa K, Gordon A, Campione JC. Distributed expertise in the classroom. In: Salomon G, editor. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1993. p. 188–288.
Calabrese Barton A, Tan E, Rivet A. Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal. 2008;45(1):68–103.
Cazden C. Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann; 2001.
Engeström Y. Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In: Engeström Y, Miettinen R, Punamaki R, editors. Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 19–38.
Granott N. Scaffolding dynamically toward change: Previous and new perspectives. New Ideas in Psychology. 2005;23(3):140–151.
Granott N, Fischer KW, Parziale J. Bridging the unknown: A transition mechanism in development and learning. In: Granott N, Parziale J, editors. Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 131–156.
Gutiérrez KD, Baquedano-Lopez P, Tejeda C. Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture and Activity. 1999;6(4):286–303.
Gutiérrez KD, Rogoff B. Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher. 2003;32(5):19–25.
Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
Mascolo MF. Change processes in development: The concept of coactive scaffolding. New Ideas in Psychology. 2005;23:185–196.
Mesa-Bains A. The real multiculturalism: A struggle for authority and power. In: Anderson G, editor. Reinventing the museum: Historical and contemporary perspectives on the paradigm shift. Landam, MD: Altamira Press; 2007. p. 99–109.
Moje EB, Ciechanowski KM, Kramer K, Ellis L, Carrillo R, Collazo T. Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly. 2004;39:38–72.
Moschovich J, Brenner M. Using a naturalistic lens on mathematics and science cognition and learning. In: Kelly AE, Lesh R, editors. Research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000. p. 517–545.
Pea RD. The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2004;13(3):423–451.
Puchner L, Rapoport R, Gaskins S. Learning in children’s museums: Is it really happening? Curator. 2001;44(3):237–259.
Rogoff B, Paradise R, Mejia-Arauz R, Correa-Chavez M, Angelillo C. Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology. 2003;54:175–203.
Stone L, Gutiérrez K. Problem articulation and the processes of assistance: An activity theoretical view of mediation in game play. International Journal of Educational Research. 2007;46(1–2):43–56.
Vygotsky LS. Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978.
Wells G. Dialogic inquiry. Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
Wood D, Bruner J, Ross G. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry. 1976;17:89–100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mai, T., Ash, D.B. (2012). Tracing our Methodological Steps. In: Ash, D., Rahm, J., Melber, L.M. (eds) Putting Theory into Practice. New Directions in Mathematics and Science Education, vol 25. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-964-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-964-0_10
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-964-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)