Abstract
Philips, the Dutch multinational, had as its mission until 2004 “Let’s make things better”. We chose this sentence as the title of our contribution to this book because despite considerable progress in the study of interpersonal relationships in education during the last two decades, a great deal of work remains. Two topics are particularly relevant. First, further development is needed on the theoretical basis of the Model for Interpersonal Teacher Behaviour and the instrument based on this model, the Questionnaire for Teacher Interaction (QTI; Wubbels, Brekelmans, Den Brok & Van Tartwijk, 2006). Second, attention is needed for the search for (causal) relationships between moment-to-moment interactions in the classroom and the patterns of interpersonal relationships between teacher and students. The first is a sine qua non for sustainable progress in the field and the development towards a more parsimonious model. The second will advance progress in providing formative guidance and professional development to teachers in pre and in-service programmes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abele AE, Wojciszke B. Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007;93(5):751–763.
Allen M, Witt PL, Wheeless LR. The role of teacher immediacy as a motivational factor in student learning: a meta-analysis and causal model. Communication Education. 2006;55:21–31.
Brekelmans JMG, Wubbels T, Creton HA. A study of students perceptions of Physics Teachers behavior. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1990;27:335–350.
Bronfenbrenner, U. & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon (series Ed.) & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.) Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 993–1028). New York: Wiley.
Brown R. Social psychology. London: Collier-McMillan; 1965.
Cornelius-White J. Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: a meta- analysis. Review of Educational Research. 2007;77(1):113–143.
Creton HA, Wubbels T. Discipline problems with beginning teachers [in Dutch]. Utrecht: W.C.C; 1984.
Creton HA, Wubbels T, Hooymayers HP. Escalated disorderly situations in the classroom and the improvement of these situations. Teaching and Teacher Education. 1989;5(3):205215.
Den Brok P. Teaching and student outcomes: A study on teachers ’ thoughts and actions from an interpersonal and a learning activities perspective. Utrecht, The Netherlands: W.C.C; 2001.
Den Brok P, Brekelmans M, Wubbels T. Interpersonal teacher behavior and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 2004;15(3/4):407–442.
Den Brok P, Fisher D, Koul R. The importance of teacher interpersonal behaviour for secondary science students’ attitudes in Kashmir. Journal of Classroom Interaction. 2005a;40(2):5–19.
Den Brok P, Fisher D, Scott R. The importance of teacher interpersonal behaviour for student attitudes in Brunei primary science classes. International Journal of Science Education. 2005b;27:765–779.
Den Brok P, Brekelmans M, Wubbels T. Multilevel issues in studies using students’ perceptions of learning environments: The case of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Learning Environments Research. 2006a;9(3):199–213.
Den Brok P, Fisher D, Brekelmans M, Wubbels T, Rickards T. Secondary teachers’ interpersonal behaviour in Singapore, Brunei and Australia: A cross-national comparison. Asia- Pacific Journal of Education. 2006b;26(1):79–95.
De Jong, R., Van Tartwijk, J., Veldman, I., Verloop, N & Wubbels, Th. (2010). Teachers’ expectations about teacher-student interactions. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, April 30-May 4, 2010.
Dryer DC, Horowitz LM. When do opposites attract? Interpersonal complementarity versus similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997;72:592–603.
Dunkin M, Biddle B. The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1974.
Estroff SD, Nowicki S. Interpersonal complementarity, gender of interactants, and performance on word puzzles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1992;18:351–356.
Evertson CM, Weinstein CS. Classroom management as a field of inquiry. In: Evertson CM, Weinstein CS, editors. Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2006. p. 3–16.
Fabrigar LR, Visser PS, Browne MW. Conceptual and methodological issues in testing the circumplex structure of data in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1997;1:184–203.
Fisher D, Cresswell J. Actual and ideal principal interpersonal behaviour. Learning Environments Research. 1998;1:231–247.
Fisher, D. L., Fraser, B. J. & Wubbels, Th. (1992) Teacher communication style and school environment.Paper presented at the 1992 ECER conference, Enschede.
Fisher D, Henderson D, Fraser B. Interpersonal behavior in senior high school biology classes. Research in Science Education. 1995;25:125–133.
Fisher D, Waldrip B, Den Brok P. Students’ perceptions of primary teachers’ interpersonal behaviour and of cultural dimensions in the classroom environment. International Journal of Educational Research. 2005;43:25–38.
Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P. Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2007;11(2):77–83.
Foa UG. Convergence in the analysis of the structure of interpersonal behavior. Psychological Review. 1961;68:341–353.
French JR, Raven B. The basis of social power. In: Cartwright D, editor. Studies in social power. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1959. p. 150–167.
Goh SC, Fraser BJ. Validation of an elementary school version of the questionnaire on teacher interaction. Psychological Reports. 1996;79:515–522.
Goh SC, Fraser BJ. Teacher interpersonal behavior, classroom environment and student outcomes in primary mathematics in Singapore. Learning Environments Research. 1998;1:199–229.
Gurtman MB, Pincus AL. Interpersonal adjective scales: Confirmation of circumplex structure from multiple perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2000;26:374–384.
Hockley M, Harkin J. Communicating with students with learning difficulties in further education. Educational Action Research. 2000;8(2):341–360.
Hollenstein T. State space grids: Analyzing dynamics across development. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2007;31(4):384–396.
Judd CM, James-Hawkins L, Yzerbyt V, Kashima Y. Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005;89(6):899–913.
Khine MS. Study of learning environments for improving science education in Brunei. In: Khine MS, Goh SC, editors. Studies in educational learning environments. Singapore: World Scientific; 2002. p. 131–152.
Kiesler DJ. The interpersonal transaction circle: a taxonomy for complementarity in human processes. Psychological Bulletin. 1983;77:421–430.
Kokkinos CM, Charalambous K, Davazoglou A. Interpersonal teacher behaviour in primary school classrooms: A cross-cultural validation of a Greek translation of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Learning Environments Research. 2009;12:101–114.
Kremer-Hayon L, Wubbels T. Supervisors’ interpersonal behavior and student teachers’ satisfaction. In: Wubbels T, Levy J, editors. Do you know what you look like? London: Falmer Press; 1993a. p. 123–135.
Kremer-Hayon L, Wubbels T. Principals’ interpersonal behavior and teachers’ satisfaction. In: Wubbels T, Levy J, editors. Do you know what you look like? London: Falmer Press; 1993b. p. 113–122.
Kyriakides L. Extending the comprehensive model of educational effectiveness by an empirical investigation. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 2005;16:103–152.
Lapointe JM, Legault F, Batiste SJ. Teacher interpersonal behavior and adolescents’ motivation in mathematics: A comparison of learning disabled, average, and talented students. International Journal of Educational Research. 2005;43(1–2):39–54.
Leary T. An interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press Company; 1957.
Lee SSU, Fraser BJ, Fisher DL. Teacher-student interactions in Korean high school science classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2003;1:67–85.
Lewis MD, Lamey AV, Douglas L. A new dynamic systems method for analysis of early socioemotional development. Developmental Science. 1999;2:457–475.
Lewis R. Classroom discipline and student responsibility: The students’ view. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2001;17(3):307–319.
Lewis R, Romi S, Xing Q, Katz YJ. Teachers’ classroom discipline and student misbehavior in Australia, China and Israel. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2005;21(6):729–741.
Lonner WJ. The search for psychological universals. In: Triandis HC, Lambert WW, editors. Handbook of cross cultural psychology, vol. 1. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1980. p. 143–204.
Mainhard T, Van der Rijst R, Van Tartwijk J, Wubbels T. A model for the supervisor- doctoral student relationship. Higher Education. 2009;58(7):359–373.
Mainhard, T., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2011a). Stability and variability in teacher-class interaction at the start of the school year: A comparison of two classrooms. (Submitted for publication.)
Mainhard, T., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, Th. (2011b, in press). Coercive and supportive teacher behaviour: Associations with the social climate within and across classroom lessons. Learning and
Instruction.
Margianti ES. Learning environments research in Indonesia. In: Khine MS, Goh SC, editors. Studies in educational learning environments. Singapore: World Scientific; 2002. p. 153–168.
Markey PM, Funder DC, Ozer DJ. Complementarity of interpersonal behaviours in dyadic interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2003;29:1082–1090.
Martin CL, Fabes RA, Hanish LD, Hollenstein T. Social dynamics in the preschool. Developmental Review. 2005;25:299–327.
Miller A, Ferguson E, Byrne I. Pupils’ causal attributions for difficult classroom behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2000;70(1):85–96.
Robertson J. The boss, the manager and the leader: Approaches to dealing with disruption. In: Rogers B, editor. Teacher leadership and behaviour management. London: Sage; 2002. p. 20–39.
Sava FA. Causes and effects of teacher conflict-inducing attitudes towards pupils: A path analysis model. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2002;18(8):1007–1027.
Schrodt P, Witt PL, Myers SA, Turman PD, Barton M, Jernberg K. Learner empowerment and students’ ratings of instruction as functions of teacher power use in the college classroom. Communication Education. 2008;57:180–200.
Segall MH, Dasen PR, Berry JW, Poortinga YH, editors. Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to cross-cultural psychology. New York: Pergamon; 1990.
Slater PE. Parental behavior and the personality of the child. Journal of Genetical Psychology. 1962;101:53–68.
Soerjaningsih W, Fraser BJ, Alldridge JM. Instructor-student interpersonal behavior and student outcomes at the university level in Indonesia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans: April; 2002.
Strack S. Introduction to the special series - Interpersonal theory and the interpersonal circumplex: Timothy Leary’s legacy. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1996;66:212–216.
Sztejnberg A, Den Brok P, Hurek J. Preferred teacher-student interpersonal behaviour: Differences between Polish primary and higher education students’ perceptions. Journal of Classroom Interaction. 2004;39(2):32–40.
Telli S, Den Brok P, Cakiroglu J. Students’ perceptions of science teachers’ interpersonal behaviour in secondary schools: Development of a Turkish version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Learning Environments Research. 2007;10:115–129.
Telli S, Den Brok P, Cakiroglu J. The importance of teacher-student interpersonal relationships for students’ subject-related attitudes in Turkey. Research in Science and Technological Education. 2010;28(3):261–276.
Thelen E, Smith LB. A dynamic system approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press; 1994.
Tiedens LZ, Fragale AR. Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003;84:558–568.
Tiedens LZ, Jimenez MC. Assimilation for affiliation and contrast for control: Complementary self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003;85(6):1049–1061.
Tracey TJ. An examination of complementarity of interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994;67:864–878.
Tracey TJG. Levels of interpersonal complementarity: A simplex representation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2004;30:1211–1225.
Tracey TJG. Interpersonal rigidity and complementarity. Journal of Research in Personality. 2005;39:592–614.
Van Oord L, Den Brok P. The international teacher: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of preferred teacher-student interpersonal behaviour in two United World Colleges. Journal of Research in International Education. 2004;3(2):131–155.
Van Tartwijk J. Sketches of teacher behavior: The interpersonal meaning of nonverbal teacher behavior in the classroom [in Dutch]. Utrecht: W.C.C; 1993.
Van Tartwijk J, Brekelmans M, Wubbels T, Fisher DL, Fraser BJ. Students perceptions of teacher interpersonal style: The front of the classroom as the teacher’s stage. Teaching and Teacher Education. 1998;14:1–11.
Wei M, Onsawad A. English teachers’ actual and ideal interpersonal behaviour and students’ outcomes in secondary schools of Thailand. The Journal of Asia TEFL. 2007;4(2):1–29.
Wei M, Den Brok P, Zhou Y. An investigation of teacher interpersonal behaviour and student achievement in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms in China. Learning Environments Research. 2009;12(3):157–174.
Wiggins JS. Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In: Grove WM, Cicchetti D, editors. Thinking clearly about psychology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1991. p. 89–113.
Wubbels, Th. (1993). Teacher-student relationships in science and mathematics classes. What Research Says to the Science and Mathematics, number 11.
Wubbels T, Levy J. A comparison of interpersonal behavior of Dutch and American teachers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 1991;15:1–18.
Wubbels T, Levy J, editors. Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relationships in education. London: Falmer; 1993.
Wubbels, T., Créton, H. A., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1985, March-April). Discipline problems of beginning teachers, interactional teacher behavior mapped out. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago (ERIC document 260040).
Wubbels T, Brekelmans M, Den Brok P, Van Tartwijk J. An interpersonal perspective on classroom management in secondary classrooms in the Netherlands. In: Evertson C, Weinstein CS, editors. Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary issues. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2006. p. 1161–1191.
Zijlstra, H., Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2011). Child perceptions of the teacher-child relationship and mathematical achievement: An interpersonal perspective on teaching early grade classrooms. (Submitted for publication.)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wubbels, T., Opdenakker, MC., Brok, P.D. (2012). Let’s Make Things Better. In: Interpersonal Relationships in Education. Advances in Learning Environments Research, vol 3. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-939-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-939-8_14
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-939-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)