Skip to main content

Discourse, Betrayal, Critique

The Renewal of Human Rights Education

  • Chapter
Safe Spaces

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in the Future of Learning and Teaching ((CIFL,volume 5))

Abstract

Despite being under-theorized, Human Rights Education (HRE) has evolved into a burgeoning pedagogical formation that sources its currency from a perceived consensus on human rights universals. This proliferation is paradoxically not matched by a sustained and meaningful analysis even though HRE has far-reaching implications for educational systems world-wide, given the treaty and other obligations under the United Nations architecture. Studies on HRE predominantly focus on the conversion of human standards into pedagogical and educational concerns with the integration of HRE into education systems and practices as its main objective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andreapoulous GJ, Claude RP, editors. Human rights education for the 21st century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou A. Ethics: An essay on the understanding of evil. London: Verso; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball SJ, editor. Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. London: Routledge; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (2002). “This Is The Fourth World War:” Interview Der Spiegel, 3 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxi U. The promise of the third millennium. In: Andreopoulos GJ, Claude RP, editors. Human rights education for the 21st century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxi U. The future of human rights. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxi U. Comments. Review of Article by M. Goodale. Current anthropology. 2006;47(3):498–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneviste E. Subjectivity in language. In: Meek E, editor. Problems in general linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press; 1971. p. 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borradori G. Philosophy in a time of terror: Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. A. (2001). Getting it right: Exploring the conception and presentation of human rights in education. Unpublished Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell T. Rights: A critical introduction. London: Routledge; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claude R. Educating for human rights, the Philippines and beyond. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corson D. Emancipatory leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2000;3(2):93–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies B, Harre R. Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior. 1990;20(10):43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delanty G. The cosmopolitan imagination: The renewal of critical social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida J. Of grammatology. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida J. Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, & the new international. New York: Routledge; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2003). Philosophy in a time of terror. In G. Borradori, Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douzinas C. The end of human rights. Critical legal thought at the turn of the century. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douzinas C. ‘Left or Rights?’ Review of Rights: A critical introduction by T. Campbell. Journal of Law & Society: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans T, editor. Human rights fifty years on. A reappraisal. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans T. The politics of human rights. A global perspective. London: Pluto Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N. Language and power. London: Longman; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N. Discourse processes and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis and marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society. 1993;4(2):138–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N. Peripheral vision: Discourse analysis in organizational studies: The case for critical realism. Organization Studies. 2005;26:915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N, Wodak R. Critical discourse analysis. In: van Dijk T, editor. Discourse as social interaction. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 1997. p. 258–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M. The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Harper Colophon Books; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M. Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1994). Power. Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984, Volume 3. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrity Z. Discourse analysis, Foucault and social work research: Identifying some methodological complexities. Journal of Social Work. 2010;10(2):193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhart GM. Review. Council on Foreign Relations. 2003;82(2):166–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldup, T. (2007). Review of Human rights and empire: The political philosophy of cosmopolitanism by Costas Douzinas, King’s Law Journal, 535-540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch A. Are human rights liberal? Journal of Human Rights. 2009;8:301–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2003). Philosophy in a Time of Terror. In G. Borradori, Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. Time of transitions. Cambrigde: Polity; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday MAK, Hassan R. Language, context and text: Aspects of language as a social- semiotic perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (2001). Foucault: Power, Knowledge and discourse. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates. Discourse theory and practice: A reader. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton LA. The political philosophy of needs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge R, Kress G. Language as ideology. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge R, Kress G. Social semiotics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook D. Genealogy, discourse, “effective history”: Foucault and the work of critique. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2005;2:3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honig, B. (2006). Dead rights, live futures: On Habermas’s attempt to reconcile constitutionalism and democracy. In L.Thomassen (Ed) The Derrida-Habermas reader. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth D. Discourse. New Delhi: Viva Books Private Limited; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff M. The rights revolution. Toronto: House of Anansi Press Limited; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishay MR. The history of human rights. From ancient times to the globalization era. California: University of California Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen M, Phillips L. Discourse analysis and theory and method. London: Sage; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keet A. Human rights education: A conceptual analysis. Saarbruken: Lampert Academic Publishing; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress G. Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge; 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau E. Metaphor and social antagonism. In: Nelson C, Grossberg L, editors. Marxism and the interpretation and culture. Basingstok: Macmillan Education; 1988. p. 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau E, Mouffe C. Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart, V., & Savolainen, K. (Eds.) (2002). Special issue on education and human rights, International Review of Education, 48(3 & 4), 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke T. Critical discourse analysis. London: Continuum; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (1995-1996). Text and discourse in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Review of Research in Education, 21, 3-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matolino B. Radicals versus moderates: A critique of Gyekye’s moderate communitarianism. South African Journal of Philosophy. 2009;28(2):16–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutua M. Human rights. A political and cultural critique. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozsu U. Review of Human rights and empire: The political philosophy of cosmopolitanism, by C. Douzinas. European Journal of International Law. 2008;19:859–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecheux M. Language, semantics and ideology. New York: St. Martin’s Press; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook A. Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. (2003). Introduction: Foucault today. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from the essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (pp. vii-xxxv). New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers R. A critical discourse analysis of family literacy practices: Power in and out of print. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlabaum; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers R, Malancharuvil-Berkes E, Mosley M, Hui D, O’Garro Joseph G. Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research. 2005;75(3):365–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz B. Jeremy Bentham. In: Baggini J, Stangroom J, editors. Great Thinkers A-Z. London: Continuum; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. Elements of a theory of human rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 2004;32(4):315–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. The idea of justice. London: Penguin Books Ltd.; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souter J. Humanity, suffering and victimhood: A defence of human rights pragmatism. Politics. 2009;29(1):45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, D., & Ramirez, F. (2004). Human rights and citizenship: The emergence of human rights education. Working Papers, Number 12, Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law, Stanford Institute for International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez D. Creating global citizens? Human rights in Latin America and the Caribbean Cal. USA: Stanford University; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez D, Ramirez F, Koo J. UNESCO and the Associated Schools Project: Symbolic affirmation of world community, international understanding, and human rights. Sociology of Education. 2009;83(2):197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbitts F. Understanding what we do: Emerging models for human rights education. International Review of Education. 2002;48(3 & 4):159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titscher S, Meyer M, Wodak R, Vetter E. Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing J. New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk T. Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society. 1993;4(2):249–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vass E. Diskursanalyse als interdisziplinäres Forschungsgebiet. Universität Wien: Diplomarbeit; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma V. Justice, equality and community. An essay in Marxist political theory. New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, S. (2005). Simone Weil: An anthology. S. Miles (Ed.). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherall M, Taylor S, Yates S. Discourse theory and practice: A reader. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherall A, Watson BM, Gallois C. Language, discourse & social psychology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Willig C, editor. Applied discourse analysis: Social and psychological interventions. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak R. Disorders of discourse. London: Longman; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak R, Meyer M. Methods of critical discourse analysis: Introducing qualitative methods. New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak R, Reisigl M. Discourse and discrimination: Rhetoric of racism and anti-Semitism. London: Routledge; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates S, Hiles D. Towards a “critical ontology of ourselves”? Foucault, subjectivity and discourse analysis. Theory and Psychology. 2010;20(1):52–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žižek S. Living in the end times. London: Verso; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keet, A. (2012). Discourse, Betrayal, Critique. In: Roux, C. (eds) Safe Spaces. Critical Issues in the Future of Learning and Teaching, vol 5. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-936-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships