Abstract
A study was conducted to find out ideas of students from rural and urban areas about biological concepts such as respiration, reproduction, circulation, photosynthesis, nutrition and excretion. It was observed that students displayed anthropocentric and mechanistic views about these biological concepts. They understood the concepts of circulation, role of vitamins and a balanced diet but were confused with the concepts of respiration, functioning of the heart, photosynthesis and the role of nutrients. Students equated breathing with respiration, assumed the heart functions to purify and form blood, and thought vitamins were a source of energy. Rural students from vernacular media believed the heart hoards emotions and feelings and plants release oxygen only to support living organisms. The study showed that misconceptions about respiration, vitamins, blood circulation and gaseous exchange persist across grade levels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abimbola, I. O. & Baba, S. (1996). Misconceptions & alternative conceptions in science textbook: The role of teachers as filters.The American Biology Teacher, 58, 14-19.
Amir, R. & Tamir, P. (1990). Detailed analysis of misconceptions as a basis for developing remedial instruction: the case of photosynthesis. Paper presented at the AERA annual meeting, Boston MA, April 1990. Retrieved September 22, 2010 from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid…?doi=10.1.1…
Amir R, Tamir P. In-depth analysis of misconceptions as basis for developing research based remedial instruction: The ease of photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher. 1994;56:94–100.
Ausubel DP. The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1963.
Ausubel DP. Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1968.
Barras R. Some misconceptions and misunderstandings perpetuated by teachers and textbook of biology. Journal of Biology Education. 1984;18:201–206.
Bell B. Students’ ideas about plant nutrition: What are they? Journal of Biological Education. 1985;19:213–218.
Buckley B. Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology. International Journal Science Education. 2000;22:895–935.
Champagne, A. B., Gunstone, R. E, & Klopfer, L. E. (1985). Instructional consequences of students’ knowledge about physical phenomena. In L. West & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change, (pp. 61-90). New York: Academic Press.
Chi, M.T.H., & Roscoe, R.D. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 3-27). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
Deshmukh, N. D. (2009). A Study of Students’ and Teachers’ Misconceptions in Biology at the Secondary School Level. Proceedings of the International Conference entitled “Intercultural Education: Published by the Hellenic Migration Policy Institute, Greece. ISBN: 978-960-98897-0-4
Deshmukh, N. D & Deshmukh, V. M. (2007). A Study of Students’ Misconceptions in Biology at the Secondary School Level. Proceedings of epiSTEME-2: An International Conference to Review Research on Science, Technology and Mathematics Education (pp. 137-141). Delhi, India: Macmillan India Ltd.
Dikmenli M, Cardak O. A study on misconceptions in the 9th grade high school Biology textbook. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2004;17:130–141.
diSessa, A. A. (2006). A history of conceptual change research: Threads and fault lines. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Driver R. Pupils’ alternative frameworks in science. European Journal of Science Education. 1981;3(1):93–101.
Driver R. Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education. 1989;11:481–489.
Duit, R. (2006). Bibliography STCSE - Teachers’ and Students’ Conceptions and Science Education. Kiel, Germany: IPN - Leibniz Institute for Science Education (http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html).
Erdmann MM. Improving conceptual change concerning photosynthesis through text design. Learning and Instruction. 2001;11:241–257.
Fisher KM. A misconception in biology: Amino acids and translation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1985;22(1):63–72.
Fielder Y, Amir R, Tamir P. High school students’ difficulties in understanding osmosis. International Journal of Science Education. 1987;9:541–551.
Geelan, D. R. (2000). Sketching some postmodern alternatives: Beyond paradigms and research programs as referents for science education. “Electronic Journal of Science Education,” 5(2), Retrieved September 24, 2010 from http://wolfweb.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/geelan.html
Gilbert JK, Osborne RJ, Fenshman PJ. Children’s science and its consequences for teaching”. Science Education. 1982;66(4):623–633.
Haslam R, Treagust DF. Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education. 1987;21(3):203–211.
Confrey J. A Review of the Research on Student Conceptions in Mathematics, Science, and Programming. Review of Research in Education. 1982;16(1990):3–56.
Lloyd CL. The elaboration of concepts in three biology textbook: Facilitating student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1990;27(10):1019–1032.
Maharashtra State Bureau of Text Book Production and Curriculum Research (MSBTBPCR), Pune, (2006). Science and Technology Textbook for Class 9.
Mann M, Treagust DR. A Pencil and paper instrument to diagnose students’ conceptions of breathing, gas exchange and respiration. Australian Science Teachers Journal. 1998;44(2):55–60.
Mintzes, J.1., Wandersee, J. H. & Novak, J. D. (2001). Assessing understanding in biology”. Journal of Biological Education, 35(3), 118-125.
Novak, J. D. (1970). The improvement of biology teaching. Cornell University Press.
Novak JD. Meta-learning and meta-knowledge strategies to help students learn how to learn. In: West L, Pines A, editors. Cognitive structure and conceptual change. New York: Academic Press; 1985. p. 189–207.
Perkins DN, Simmons R. Patterns of misunderstanding: An integrative model for science, math, and programming. Review of Educational Research. 1988;58(3):303–326.
Piaget J. The child’s conception of the world. New York: Harcourt Brace; 1929.
Posner, G. 1., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
Sanders M. Erroneous ideas about respiration: The teacher factor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1993;30(8):919–934.
Simpson WD, Marek EA. Understandings and misconceptions of biology concepts held by students attending small high schoo1s and students attending large high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1988;25:361–374.
Songer CJ, Mintzes JJ. Understanding cellular respiration: An analysis of conceptual change in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1994;31:621–637.
Soyibo K. Selected science misconceptions amongst some Nigerian school certificate students. In: Helm H, Novak JD, editors. Proceedings of the international seminar: Misconceptions in science and mathematics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University; 1983. p. 425–427.
Storey RD. Textbook errors and misconceptions in biology: Cell energetics. The American Biology Teacher.. 1992;54:161–166.
Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C. & Geban, O. (2001). The Contribution of conceptual change texts Accompanied by concept mapping to students’ understanding of the human circulatory system”. School Science and Mathematics LO1 (2), 91-101
Tekkaya C. Remediating High School Students’ Misconceptions Concerning Diffusion and Osmosis through Concept Mapping and Conceptual Change Text. Research in Science & Technological Education. 2003;21(1):2003.
Vosniadou, S. (2002). On the nature of naive physics. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.). Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 61-67). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J. & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science, In D.L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, (pp. 177-210). New York: Macmillan.
Waheed T, Lucas AM. Understanding interrelated topics: photosynthesis at age 14. Journal of Biological Education. 1992;26(3):193–200.
Westbrook SL, Marek EA. Across-age study of student understanding of the concept of diffusion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1991;28(8):649–660.
Yip DY. Identification of misconceptions in novice biology teachers and remedial strategies for improving biology teaching. International Journal of Science Education. 1998;20(4):461–477.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Deshmukh, N.D. (2012). Designing and Field Testing of Remedial Material to Rectify Students’ Misconceptions in Biology at the Secondary School Level. In: Kim, M., Diong, C.H. (eds) Biology Education for Social and Sustainable Development. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-927-5_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-927-5_28
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-927-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)