Skip to main content

Faltering Effects of Market-Oriented Reforms on Italian Higher Education

Focus on Reforms Promoting Competition

  • Chapter
Public Vices, Private Virtues?

Part of the book series: Issues in Higher Education ((CHER,volume 2))

Abstract

Since late ‘80s, higher education reform policies in Europe as well as in the most developed countries have been characterized by a strong emphasis on, and a commitment towards, the development of market or market-like logic and arrangements both in governing and organizing higher education sector and institutions. Generally, it is acknowledged that market-oriented reforms and policies in higher education are based on three main pillars: 1) awarding a larger and substantive autonomy to higher education institutions, paralleled by accountability and performance-based evaluation for allocating public resources; 2) a growing pressure on institutions to seek and retrieve entrepreneurially economic resources in order to complement, but also to expand, their financial budgets as the state growingly retrenched; 3) competition among institutions, as well as within individual institutions, on attracting students, scholars and economic resources (both public and private).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Bianco, L. (2002). Effetti della riforma dei concorsi universitari su carriere accademiche e dinamiche di genere. Polis, 3, 417–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boffo, S., Moscati, R., & Vaira, M. (2004). The international attractiveness of academic workplace in Europe: The case of Italy. In J. Enders & E. de Wert (Eds.), The international attractiveness of the academic workplace in Europe. Frankfurt: GEW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1977). Academic power in Italy. Bureaucracy and oligarchy in a national university system. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CNVSU (Comitato nazionale di valutazione del sistema universitario). (2004). Proposte per la costruzione di un nuovo modello per la ripartizione “teorica” del FFO alle università statali. Documento n. 1/04.

    Google Scholar 

  • CNVSU. (2005). Riflessioni a valle dell’applicazione sperimentale prevista dal D.M. 28 luglio 2004. Documento n. 4/05.

    Google Scholar 

  • CNVSU. (2009). Indicatori per la ripartizione del Fondo di cui all’art. 2 della Legge 1/2009. Documento n. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corradi, F., & M. Rostan (2009). Autonomia delle università e ricerca dell’eccellenza in Italia. In F. Corradi (Ed.), Alla ricerca dell’eccellenza. Le politiche per l’eccellenza in quattro Paesi europei. Milano: LED Edizioni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, G. (2001). La gestione delle risorse umane nell’università dell’autonomia. In M. Strassoldo (Ed.), L’azienda univesità. Le sfide del cambiamento. Torino: ISEDI/UTET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, P., & Piore, M. (1971). Internal labour market and manpower analysis. Lexington, KY: Lexington Health Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giarda, P. (2004, Settembre 17–19). Il finanziamento dell’università italiana. Revised version of the paper presented at 2° convegno CODAU “Quindici anni di riforme nell’Università Italiana. Quali prospettive?” organized by Università degli Studi di Palermo, Ustica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giglioli, P. P. (1979). Baroni e burocrati. Il ceto accademico italiano. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzzatto, G., & Moscati, R. (2005). University reform in Italy: Fears, expectations and contradictions. In Å. Gornitzka, M. Kogan, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Reform and change in higher education. Analysing policy implementation. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzzatto, G., & Pontremoli, S. (2002). Università: la riforma è iniziata. Milano: RCS Libri/La Nuova Italia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Progetto UNIMON. (2006). L’università si trasforma: L’Italia e l’Europa. Risultati del monitoraggio della riforma degli ordinamenti didattici in sei università italiane. Research report, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reale, E. (Ed.). (2008). La valutazione della ricerca pubblica. Una analisi della valutazione triennale della ricerca. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostan M., & Vaira, M. (2007). Changing patterns of university/industry relations in Italy. In J. Enders & B. Jongbloed (Eds.), Public and private dynamics in higher education. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaira, M. (2003). Higher education reform in Italy: An institutional analysis and a first appraisal, 1996–2001. Higher Education Policy, 16, 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaira, M. (Forthcoming). Dall’idea alla pratica. La costruzione della riforma universitaria. Milano: LED Edizioni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M. ([1922] 1968). Economy and society (G. Roth & K. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rostan, M., Vaira, M. (2011). Faltering Effects of Market-Oriented Reforms on Italian Higher Education. In: Teixeira, P.N., Dill, D.D. (eds) Public Vices, Private Virtues?. Issues in Higher Education, vol 2. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-466-9_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships