Skip to main content

Management of Low and Intermediate Level Waste

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nuclear Waste Management

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Energy ((LNEN,volume 83))

Abstract

Low and intermediate level wastes (LILW) are generated from nuclear power plants, industrial processes, research laboratories, and hospitals. Although low in radioactivity contents in comparison to high level waste, LILW, with widespread presence of its generators in various sectors of society, demands foresight and careful planning and coordination for its safe management and disposal. This chapter describes an overview of LILW management approaches including their characterization, classification, treatment, packaging, and disposal. The issue of mixed hazardous and radioactive waste is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Further Reading

  • Saling JH, Fentiman AW (2002) Radioactive waste management, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghissi AA (1986) Radioactive waste technology. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York

    Google Scholar 

References

  • ANL (2011) International low level waste disposal practices and facilities, Fuel cycle research and development. Argonne National Laboratory, ANL-FCT-324

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra, DTI, and the Devolved Administrations (2007) Policy for the long term management of solid low level radioactive waste in the United Kingdom. Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE (2016) Final environmental impact statement for the disposal of Greater-Than-Class C (GTCC) Low-level radioactive waste and GTCC-like waste. U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/EIS-0375

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE (2018) Manifest Information Management System (MIMS). U.S. Department of Energy, 2009–2018

    Google Scholar 

  • EnergySolutions (2015) Bulk waste disposal and treatment facilities waste acceptance criteria revision 10. EnergySolutions Clive, Utah

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (1984) Compatibility of grouts with Hazardous Wastes. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-600/2-84-015

    Google Scholar 

  • EPRI (1996) Low-level radioactive waste characterization guidelines. Electric Power Research Institute, EPRI TR-107201, 2691, Project 4289–16, Palo Alto, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • EPRI (2015) Development of generic scaling factors for Technetium-99 and Iodine-129 in low and intermediate level waste. Electric Power Research Institute, EPRI Report 3002005564, Palo Alto, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • France (2014) Fifth national report on compliance with the joint convention obligations. Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (1983) Conditioning of low and intermediate-level radwaste. Technical report series 222, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2002) Management of low and intermediate level radioactive wastes with regard to their chemical toxicity. International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA-TECDOC-1325, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2006a) Safety glossary: terminology used in nuclear, radiation, radioactive waste and transport safety (Version 2.0). International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA Booklet, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2006b) Improvements of radioactive waste management at WWER nuclear power plants. International Atomic Energy Agency, TECDOC-1492, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2006c) Innovative waste treatment and conditioning technologies at nuclear power plants. International Atomic Energy Agency, TECDOC-1504, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2007) Strategy and methodology for radioactive waste characterization. International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA-TECDOC-1537, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2009a) Classification of radioactive waste: General safety guide. International Atomic Energy Agency, Safety Standards Series No. GSG-1, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2009b) Determination and use of scaling factors for waste characterization in nuclear power plants. International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Energy Series No. NW-T-1.18, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2012a) Efficient water management in water cooled reactors. International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Energy Series, No. NP-T-2.6

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2012b) Regulations for the safe transport of radioactive material, 2012 Edition. International Atomic Energy Agency, SSR-6. Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2014) Management of disused sealed radioactive sources. International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Energy Series No. NW-T-1.3, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2018) Status and trends in spent fuel and radioactive waste management. International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Energy Series, No. NW-T-1.14, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • INEL (1994) Directions in low-level radioactive waste management: a brief history of commercial low-level radioactive waste disposal. DOE/LLW-103 Rev. 1, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory EG&G Idaho, Inc. Idaho Falls, Idaho

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolley RL et al (1986) Low-level radioactive waste from commercial nuclear reactors, Volume 2. treatment, storage, disposal, and transportation technologies and constraints, ORNL/TM-9846-Vol.2, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

    Google Scholar 

  • LLW Repository Ltd (2016) International Approaches to Radioactive Waste Classification. National Waste Programme (UK), UK Nuclear Waste Management Ltd, NWP-REP-134

    Google Scholar 

  • LLW Repository Ltd (2018) NWP container signposting resource. National Waste Programme (UK), UK Nuclear Waste Management Ltd, Version: Issue 2

    Google Scholar 

  • NEA (1990) Low-level radioactive waste repositories: an analysis of costs. Nuclear Energy Agency/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • NEI (2006) Utility perspective on low-level radioactive waste disposition. EPRI International LLW Conference and ASME/EPRI Radwaste Workshop, Nuclear Energy Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (1983) Final waste classification and waste form technical position papers. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Technical Position on Waste Form, C 2:6

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (1993) Disposal Unit Source Term (DUST) data input guide. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, NUREG/CR6041, BNL-NUREG-52375

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (2000) Low-level radioactive waste classification, characterization, and assessment: waste streams and neutron-activated metals. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Agency, NUREG/CR-6567, PNNL-11659

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (2007) History and framework of commercial low-level radioactive waste management in the United States. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG- 1853

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (2012) Report on waste burial charges: changes in decommissioning waste disposal costs at low-level waste burial facilities, Rev 15. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Agency, NUREG-1307

    Google Scholar 

  • OPG (2019) Western Waste Management Facility (WWMF). Ontario Power Generation. https://www.opg.com/powering-ontario/our-generation/nuclear/nuclear-waste-waste-management. Last accessed 30 Jan 2020

  • SKB (1996) SKB annual report 1995. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co (SKB), Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • SKB (2007) Correlation factors for C-14, Cl-36, Ni-59, Ni-63, Mo-93, Tc-99, I-129 and Cs-135 in operational waste for SFR 1. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co (SKB), SKB Rapport R-07-05, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • SKB (2011) International perspective on repositories for low level waste. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. (SKB), No. SKB-R-11-16

    Google Scholar 

  • SSM (2015) Safe and responsible management of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste in Sweden. Notification of the Swedish National Programme under the Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom (National Plan). Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Homework

Homework

  • Problem 13.1: Discuss the pros and cons of current U.S. nuclear waste classification scheme. If we ought to make any changes for improvement, what would be your suggested changes?

  • Problem 13.2: Based on the US LLW classification scheme, determine the class of the LILW with the following mix of nuclide concentrations.

    1. (a)

      63Ni at 15 Ci/m3 & 90Sr at 50 Ci/m3

    2. (b)

      63Ni at 30 Ci/m3 & 90Sr at 100 Ci/m3

  • Problem 13.3: In a nuclear power plant, 5 kg of wastes with a total activity of 2 μCi was accumulated of which 1 μCi was from 241Am. The rest of the activity is due to isotopes with Z < 92. What is the class of this waste according to the US LLW classification scheme?

  • Problem 13.4: The steady state (saturation) concentration of the fission production 131I (t1/2 = 8.07 day) in PWR fuel during irradiation is 0.023 Ci/watt of thermal power. During normal operation, 0.1% of the fuel rods in a PWR core fail each year. Assume that the entire inventory of iodine in each failed fuel rod is discharged into the primary reactor coolant. It has been proposed to install an anion exchange column to remove the iodine from the primary coolant. The column would process a side-stream of 5% of the total primary coolant flow and would achieve a decontamination factor of 20 (i.e., 95% of the iodine entering the column would be sorbed on the ion exchange resin).

Calculate the amount by which the steady-state iodine concentration in the primary coolant would be reduced if the column were installed. Base your calculation on a 1000 MWe PWR. Use the following reactor parameters: Thermal efficiency = 0.33; Primary coolant volume = 375 m3; Primary coolant circulation time = 12 s.

  • Problem 13.5: A 55 gallon (200 liter) drum containing ion-exchange resins is labeled LLW and is found to have a total of 100 Bq/g activity concentration emitting 1 MeV gamma-rays. Determine the dose rate at the measurement location at 50 cm from the surface of the container. Assume a resin density of 0.8 g/cm3, mass absorption coefficient of air for 1 MeV gamma-ray is 0.0280 cm2/g, mass attenuation coefficient of air for 1 MeV gamma-ray is 0.0636, and density of air is 0.001225 g/cm3.

  • Problem 13.6: By using the information given in Table 13.13, determine the total fee to pay at each of the U.S. LLW disposal facilities for the disposal of the following LILW. (Use $6/ft3 for Atlantic Coast Compact administration charge at the South Carolina facility)

    1. (a)

      Ten of 20 ft. Sea land container (B-25 Steel Boxes, 92.86 ft3 each)

      • Dose rate on container: 210 mR/hr. on each box

      • Total activity: 1000 mCi

      • 14C activity: 1 mCi

      • Density of waste: 50 lbs./ft3

      • Total weight of S/L: 48,000 lbs.

    2. (b)

      One High Integrity Container (HIC) in Type A Cask (120 ft3)

      • Dose rate: 5 R/hr. on HIC contact, 100 mR/hr. on Type A cask contact

      • Total activity: 10 Ci

      • 14C activity: 100 mCi

      • Waste weight: 10,000 lbs.

      • Density of waste: 84 lb./ft3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yim, MS. (2022). Management of Low and Intermediate Level Waste. In: Nuclear Waste Management. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 83. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2106-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2106-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-2104-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-2106-4

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics