Skip to main content

Assessing and Addressing the Fit of Planned Interventions to the Organizational Context

  • Chapter
Derailed Organizational Interventions for Stress and Well-Being

Abstract

Although organizational interventions are generally recommended, there has been criticism of the lack of effectiveness of such interventions. This has led to researchers recommending the evaluation of processes of such interventions to understand what works for whom, why, how and in which circumstances. Process evaluation research has highlighted a number of factors that may go wrong during the intervention process. In this chapter we argue that organizational interventions may fail because researchers do not assess and address the fit of the intervention to the organizational context and the individuals within the organization. To address these issues we present and discuss a model for C-I (context-intervention) and P-I (person-intervention) fit and we suggest supportive initiatives that researchers may consider implementing at the early stages of intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aust, B., Rugulies, R., Finken, A., & Jensen, C. (2010). When workplace interventions lead to negative effects: Learning from failures. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(Suppl 3), 106–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl-Jørgensen, C., & Saksvik, P. Ø. (2005). The impact of two organizational interventions on the health of service sector workers. International Journal of Health Services, 35, 529–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, K. (2000). Measures of five aspects of affective well-being at work. Human Relations, 53, 275–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • ETUC. (2004). Framework agreement on work-related stress. Brussels: European Trade Union Confederation.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU-OSHA. (2010). European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks, 2010. Available at: www.esener.eu

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ILO. (2001). Guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems. Geneva: International Labor Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsbergis, P., & Vivona-Vaughan, E. (1995). Evaluation of an occupational stress intervention in a public agency. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. (2013). Review article: How can we make organizational interventions work? Employees and line managers as actively crafting interventions. Human Relations, 66, 1029–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., Abildgaard, J. S., & Daniels, K. (2014). Putting context into organizational intervention design: Using tailored questionnaires to measure initiatives for worker well-being. Human Relations, 67, 1537–1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., & Randall, R. (2009). Managers’ active support when implementing teams: The impact on employee well-being. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1, 374–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., & Abildgaard, J. S. (2013). Evaluating organizational interventions: A research-based framework of process and effect evaluation. Work & Stress, 27, 278–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., & Randall, R. (2013). Opening the black box: Presenting a model for evaluating organizational-level interventions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., & Randall, R. (2012a). Opening the black box: A framework for evaluating organizational-level occupational health interventions. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., & Randall, R. (2012b). The importance of employee participation and perception of changes in procedures in a teamworking intervention. Work & Stress, 29, 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., Fredslund, H., Christensen, K. B., & Albertsen, K. (2006). Success or failure? Interpreting and understanding the impact of interventions in four similar worksites. Work & Stress, 20, 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., Randall, R., & Christensen, K. B. (2010a). Does training managers enhance the effects of implementing teamworking? A longitudinal, mixed methods field study. Human Relations, 63, 1719–1741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., Randall, R., Holten, A. L., & Rial González, E. (2010b). Conducting organizational-level occupational health interventions: What works? Work & Stress, 24, 234–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., Taris, T. W., & Cox, T. (2010c). The future of organizational interventions: Addressing the challenges of today’s organizations. Work & Stress, 24, 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., Stage, M., Abildgaard, J. S., & Brauer, C. V. (2013). Participatory Intervention from an organizational perspective: Employees as active agents in creating a healthy work environment. In G. Bauer & G. Jenny (Eds.), Salutogenic organizations and change: The concepts between organizational health intervention research (pp. 327–349). Dordrecht: Springer Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, R., & Nielsen, K. (2010). Interventions to promote well-being at work. In S. Leka & J. Houdmont (Eds.), Occupational health psychology (1st ed., pp. 88–123). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, R., & Nielsen, K. (2012). Does the intervention fit? An explanatory model of intervention success or failure in complex organizational environments. In C. Biron, M. Karanika-Murray, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Improving organizational interventions for stress and well-being: Addressing process and context. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Horn, J. E., Taris, T. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Schreurs, P. C. (2004). The structure of occupational well-being: A study among Dutch teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiezer, N., Nielsen, K., Pahkin, K., Widerszal-Bazyl, M., de Jong, T., Mattila-Holappa, P., et al. (2011). Exploring the link between restructuring and employee well-being. Warsaw: Central Institute for Labour Protection – National Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karina Nielsen MSc, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nielsen, K., Randall, R. (2015). Assessing and Addressing the Fit of Planned Interventions to the Organizational Context. In: Karanika-Murray, M., Biron, C. (eds) Derailed Organizational Interventions for Stress and Well-Being. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9867-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics