Abstract
The rapid development of wind power in Europe has led to a debate about the most suitable location for new sites, in which the need to install turbines in areas with high wind potential must be balanced against their inevitable impact on the landscape and other environmental concerns. Conflicts can arise because wind turbines tend to be located in natural areas on which they have a strong visual impact, especially as there is a widespread belief that landscapes are immutable. Wind energy development also encounters local opposition when decisions are perceived as being externally imposed to the benefit of others from outside the area. There is a commonly held notion that wind farms should not be installed in natural parks, given that their function is to preserve natural and cultural landscapes of high value. This chapter however demonstrates that the situation regarding wind power development in these parks varies enormously, as in many of them the natural conditions for wind power development are very favourable. We analyse wind power development in natural parks in three European countries (Spain, Germany and France) in which the number of wind power projects has grown significantly over the last decade. Wind farms have been installed in natural parks in all of these countries. In France and Spain, this development has been restricted to small areas considered of low cultural and natural heritage value. In Germany, by contrast, some natural parks have a high concentration of wind farms, while others remain free of any wind power development. The aim of this chapter is to analyse the forces driving the development of wind power in these protected areas and to identify the differences between the three countries under consideration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Länder is the plural of Land.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
References
Afonso AI, Mendes C (2010) Energía eólica y paisajes protegidos: Controversias en el parque natural de montesinho. Nimbus: Revista de climatología, meteorología y paisaje 25–26:5–20
Aitken M (2010) Why we still don’t understand the social aspects of wind power: a critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy 38:1834–1841. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.060
Ariza-Montobbio P, Farrell KN (2012) Wind farm siting and protected areas in Catalonia: planning alternatives or reproducing ‘one-dimensional thinking’? Sustainability 4:3180–3205. doi:10.3390/su4123180
Benkenstein M, Zielke K, Bastian D-KJ (2003) Wirkungseffekte von Offshore-Windkraftanlagen in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern auf touristische Nachfrage-und Angebotsstrukturen. Ostseeinstitut für Marketing, Verkehr und Tourismus an der Universität Rostock, Endbericht
FORSA (Gesellschaft für Sozialforschung und statistische Analysen mbH) (2007) Umfrage zum Thema Erneuerbare Energien. Berlin
Frolova M (2010) Los paisajes de la energía eólica: Su percepción social y gestión en España. Nimbus: Revista de climatología, meteorología y paisaje 25–26:93–110
Frolova M, Pérez Pérez B (2008) El desarrollo de las energías renovables y el paisaje: algunas bases para la implementación de la Convención Europea del Paisaje en la política energética española. Cuadernos Geográficos de la Universidad de Granada 43:289–309
Günther W (2002) Touristische Effekte von On- und Offshore-Windkraftanlagen in Schleswig-Holstein. Stimmen zur Windenergie: 61–63
GWEC (2013) Global wind report 2012 – annual market update. Global Wind Energy Council: 72. http://www.gwec.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Annual_report_2012_LowRes.pdf
IfR Institut für Regionalmanagement (2012) Besucherbefragung zur Akzeptanz von Windkraftanlagen in der Eifel
IUCN (2008) Guidelines for applying protected area management categories
Johnson GD, Perlik MK, Erickson WP, Strickland MD (2004) Bat activity, composition, and collision mortality at a large wind plant in Minnesota. Wildl Soc Bull 32:1278–1288. doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2004)032[1278:BACACM]2.0.CO;2
Krauss W (2010) The ‘Dingpolitik’ of wind energy in Northern German landscapes: an ethnographic case study. Landsc Res 35:195–208. doi:10.1080/01426390903557972
Lilley MB, Firestone J (2008) Wind power, wildlife and the migratory bird Treaty Act: a way forward. Environ Law 38:1167–1214
Lilley MB, Firestone J, Kempton W (2010) The effect of wind power installations on coastal tourism. Energies 3:1–22. doi:10.3390/en3010001
Möller B (2006) Changing wind-power landscapes: regional assessment of visual impact on land use and population in Northern Jutland, Denmark. Appl Energy 83:477–494. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2005.04.004
Nadaï A (2007) ‘Planning’, ‘siting’ and the local acceptance of wind power: some lessons from the French case. Energy Policy 35:2715–2726
Nadaï A, Labussière O (2009) Wind power planning in France (Aveyron): from state regulation to local experimentation. Land Use Policy 3:744–754
Nadaï A, Labussière O (2013) Playing with the line, channelling multiplicity: wind power planning in the Narbonnaise (Aude, France). Environ Plann D: Soc Space 31:116–139. doi:10.1068/d22610
Nadaï A, Van der Horst D (2010) Landscapes of energies. Landsc Res 35:143–155
Nadaï A, Krauss W, Afonso AI et al (2013) Une comparaison de l’émergence de paysages éoliens en France, Allemagne et Portugal. In: Luginbühl Y, Terrasson D (eds) Paysage et Développement Durable. Quae, Paris, pp 157–169
Pasqualetti MJ (2011) Opposing wind energy landscapes: a search for common cause. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 101:907–917. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.568879
PNR Livradois-Forez (2009) Schéma éolien: Une règle du jeu commune pour les collectivités locales du Parc naturel régional Livradois-Forez
PNR Loire-Anjou-Touraine (2009) Le Parc et l’éolien. Guide pour un développement de l’éolien raisonné et cohérent
Prados MJ, Baraja E, Frolova M, Espejo C (2012) Integración paisajística y territorial de las energías renovables. Ciudad y Territorio XLIV(171):127–143
Ratzbor G (2011) Windenergieanlagen und Landschaftsbild. Zur Auswirkung von Windrädern auf das Landschaftsbild. http://www.dnr.de/downloads/thesenpapier-landschaftsbild.pdf
Selman P (2010) Learning to love the landscapes of carbon-neutrality. Landsc Res 35:157–171. doi:10.1080/01426390903560414
SOKO-Institut Bielefeld GmbH (Institut für Sozialforschung und Kommunikation) (2005) Windkraftanlagen und Tourismus. Bevölkerungsumfrage 2005. Ausgewertete Power-Point-Datei. Eigenstudie ohne Auftraggeber
Troitiño Vinuesa MÁ, de Marcos FJ, García Hernández M et al (2005) Los espacios protegidos en España: significación e incidencia socioterritorial. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles 39:227–266
Vogel M (2005) Akzeptanz von Windparks in touristischen bedeutsamen Gemeinden der deutschen Nordseeküstenregionen. Das Institut für Maritimen Tourismus der Hochschule Bremerhaven
Weise R, Allendrof M, Koch U (2002) Windenergieanlagen im Landschaftsbild. Analyse einer Bevölkerungsumfrage in Thüringen. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, Zeitschrift für angewandte Ökologie 34:242–246
Wolsink M (2000) Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renew Energy 21:49–64. doi:10.1016/S0960-1481(99)00130-5
Wolsink M (2007) Wind power implementation: the nature of public attitudes: equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’. Renew Sust Energ Rev 11:1188–1207. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.005
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Deshaies, M., Herrero-Luque, D. (2015). Wind Energy and Natural Parks in European Countries (Spain, France and Germany). In: Frolova, M., Prados, MJ., Nadaï, A. (eds) Renewable Energies and European Landscapes. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9843-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9843-3_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9842-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9843-3
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)