Abstract
Evolutionary developmental biology (Evo-devo) research is made up of many overlapping intersections among specialties, including genetics, developmental biology, cell biology, morphology, paleontology, and behavior. Often, an intersection develops into a specialty in its own right, but Evo-devo remains a juncture: a place where many specialties interact, but where integration among them is limited. It has been a locus of debates, as well as a place of cooperative production. This paper considers this pattern of incomplete integration of specialties from a sociological perspective. There are at least two kinds of reason for this pattern. First, technical disputes and incompatibilities of many kinds slow or block the integration of different approaches into a single, more comprehensive view. At the same time, the juncture is held together over time by a network of connections among the lines of research that comprise it. My emphasis here is on the pattern of connections and incompatibilities in Evo-devo, rather than on specific research issues. In particular, the ways in which research is organized exerts important influences on the manner and extent of specialty integration. Second, relations among sponsors, hosts, associations, and the research they support sometimes make it more difficult or more unlikely for cross-specialty research programs to collaborate or integrate effectively. I describe some of the institutional and organizational constraints that shape and limit the course of intersections and specialties, with special attention to the course of events in Evo-devo research and its current state of affairs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The correct emphasis here is on “relatively,” not “easy.”
References
Alberch, P. 1980. Ontogenesis and morphological diversification. American Zoologist 20: 653–667.
Alberch, P. 1982. Developmental constraints in evolutionary processes. In Evolution and development, ed. J.T. Bonner, 213–332. Berlin: Springer.
Alberch, P. 1985. Problems with the interpretation of developmental sequences. Systematic Zoology 34: 46–58.
Alberch, P., S.J. Gould, G. Oster, and D. Wake. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5: 296–317.
Amundson, R. 2005. The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, D.T. 1973. Embryology and phylogeny of annelids and arthropods. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Autumn, K., M.J. Ryan, and D.B. Wake. 2002. Integrating historical and mechanistic biology enhances the study of adaptation. Quarterly Review of Biology 77: 383–408.
Bechtel, W. 2006. Discovering cell mechanisms: The creation of modern cell biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Beurton, P., R. Falk, and H.-J. Rheinberger (eds.). 2000. The concept of the gene in development and evolution: Historical and epistemological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bock, W.J., and G. von Wahlert. 1965. Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution 19: 269–299.
Burian, R.M. 1997. On conflicts between genetic and developmental viewpoints—and their resolution in molecular biology. In Structure and norms in science, ed. M.L. Dalla Chiara, K. Doetz, D. Mundici, and J. von Bentham, 243–264. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Callon, M., Y. Millo, and F. Muniesa (eds.). 2007. Market devices. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
Campbell, D.T. 1969. Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish-scale model of omniscience. In Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences, ed. M. Sherif and C.W. Sherif, 328–348. Chicago: Aldine.
Carroll, S.B., J.K. Grenier, and S.D. Weatherbee. 2001. From DNA to diversity: Molecular genetics and the evolution of animal design. Malden: Blackwell Science.
Crombie, A.C. 1988. Designed in the mind: Western visions of science, nature and humankind. History of Science 24: 1–12.
Crombie, A.C. 1994. Styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition, vol. 3. London: Duckworth.
Evans, D.S., A. Hagiu, and R. Schmalensee. 2006. Invisible engines: How software platforms drive innovation and transform industries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gehring, W.J. 1998. Master control genes in development and evolution: The homeobox story. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Geiger, R.L. 1986. To advance knowledge: The growth of American Research Universities, 1900–1940. New York: Oxford University Press.
Geiger, R.L. 1993. Research and relevant knowledge: American Research Universities since world war II. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gerhart, J., and M. Kirschner. 1997. Cells, embryos, and evolution: Toward a cellular and developmental understanding of phenotypic variation and evolutionary adaptability. Malden: Blackwell Science.
Gerson, E.M. 1998. The American system of research: Evolutionary biology, 1890–1950. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
Gerson, E.M. 2007. The juncture of evolutionary and developmental biology. In From embryology to Evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution, ed. M. Laubichler and J. Maienschein, 435–463. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gerson, E.M. 2009. Specialty boundaries, compound problems, and collaborative complexity. Biological Theory 4: 247–252.
Gilbert, S. (ed.). 1991. A conceptual history of modern embryology. New York: Plenum Press.
Gilbert, S. 2003. The morphogenesis of evolutionary developmental biology. International Journal of Developmental Biology 47: 467–477.
Gilbert, S. 2011. Expanding the temporal dimension of developmental biology: The role of environmental agents in establishing adult-onset phenotypes. Biological Theory 6: 65–72.
Gilbert, S.F., and D. Epel. 2009. Ecological developmental biology: Integrating epigenetics, medicine, and evolution. Sunderland: Sinauer Press.
Glickman, S.E., R.V. Short, and M.B. Renfree. 2005. Sexual differentiation in three unconventional mammals: Spotted hyenas, elephants and tammar wallabies. Hormones and Behavior 48: 403–417.
Goodwin, B.C., N. Holder, and C.C. Wylie (eds.). 1983. Development and evolution: The sixth symposium of the British Society for Developmental Biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gould, S.J. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.
Gould, S.J., and R.C. Lewontin. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 205: 581–598.
Griesemer, J.R. 2007. Tracking organic processes: Representations and research styles in classical embryology and genetics. In From embryology to Evo-devo: A history of developmental evolution, ed. M. Laubichler and J. Maienschein, 375–435. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Griesemer, J.R., and M.J. Wade. 1988. Laboratory models, causal explanation and group selection. Biology & Philosophy 3: 67–96.
Hackett, E.J., D. Conz, J. Parker, J. Bashford, and S. DeLay. 2004. Tokamaks and turbulence: Research ensembles, policy and technoscientific work. Research Policy 33: 747–767.
Hall, B.K. 1992. Evolutionary developmental biology. London: Chapman and Hall.
Hall, B.K., R.D. Pearson, and G. Müller (eds.). 2004. Environment, development, and evolution: Toward a synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harwood, J. 1993. Styles of scientific thought: The German Genetics Community, 1900–1933. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kirschner, M.W., and J.C. Gerhart. 2005. The plausibility of life: Resolving Darwin’s dilemma. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kohler, R.E. 1994. Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laubichler, M., and J. Maienschein (eds.). 2007. From embryology to Evo-Devo: A history of developmental evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Love, A.C. 2003. Evolutionary morphology, innovation, and the synthesis of evolutionary and developmental biology. Biology & Philosophy 18: 309–345.
Love, A.C. 2008. From philosophy to science (to natural philosophy): Evolutionary developmental perspectives. Quarterly Review of Biology 83: 65–76.
Maynard Smith, J., R.M. Burian, S.A. Kauffman, P. Alberch, J. Campbell, B.C. Goodwin, R. Lande, D.M. Raup, and L. Wolpert. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology 60: 265–287.
Mayr, E., and W.B. Provine (eds.). 1980. The evolutionary synthesis: Perspectives on the unification of biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McNamara, K.J. 1997. Shapes of time: The evolution of growth and development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Minelli, A. 2003. The development of animal form: Ontogeny, morphology, and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Minelli, A. 2009. Forms of becoming: The evolutionary biology of development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Morange, M. 2000. The developmental gene concept: History and limits. In The concept of the gene in development and evolution, ed. P.J. Beurton, R. Falk, and H.-J. Rheinberger, 193–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
National Academy of Sciences. 2004. Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.
Oppenheimer, J. 1966. The growth and development of developmental biology. In Major problems in developmental biology, ed. M. Locke, 1–27. New York: Academic.
Pantin, C.F.A. 1968. The relations between the sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Place, N.J., and S.E. Glickman. 2004. Masculinization of female mammals: Lessons from nature. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 545: 243–253.
Rabinow, P., and T. Dan-Cohen. 2005. A machine to make a future: Biotech chronicles. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Raff, R.A. 1996. The shape of life: Genes, development and the evolution of animal form. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Raff, R.A., and T.C. Kaufman. 1983. Embryos, genes, and evolution: The developmental-genetic basis of evolutionary change. New York: Macmillan. 2nd ed. 1991.
Rheinberger, H.-J. 1997. Toward a history of epistemic things. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rip, A. 1982. The development of restrictedness in the sciences. In Scientific establishments and hierarchies, ed. N. Elias, H. Martins, and R. Whitley, 219–238. Boston: Reidel.
Sapp, J. 1987. Beyond the gene: Cytoplasmic inheritance and the struggle for authority in genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shubin, N.H., and P. Alberch. 1986. A morphogenetic approach to the origin and basic organization of the tetrapod limb. Evolutionary Biology 20: 319–387.
Smocovitis, V.B. 1996. Unifying biology: The evolutionary synthesis and evolutionary biology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Strasser, B. 2010. Collecting, comparing, and computing sequences: The making of Margaret O. Dayhoff’s Atlas of protein sequence and structure, 1954–1965. Journal of the History of Biology 43: 623–660.
Strasser, B. 2011. The experimenter’s museum: Natural history and the moral economies of biomedicine. Isis 102: 60–96.
Sunderland, M.E. 2012. Collections-based research at Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 42: 83–113.
Veysey, L.R. 1965. The emergence of the American University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wagner, G.P., and J.A. Gauthier. 1999. 1,2,3 = 2,3,4: A solution to the problem of the homology of the digits in the avian hand. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96: 5111–5116.
Wake, D.B. 1978. Shape, form, development, ecology, genetics, and evolution. Paleobiology 4: 96–99.
Wake, D.B. 2009. What salamanders have taught us about evolution. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40: 333–352.
West-Eberhard, M.J. 2003. Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 794 p.
Wimsatt, W.C. 1987. False models as means to truer theories. In Neutral models in biology, ed. M.H. Nitecki, 23–55. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Acknowledgments
Prepared for a conference on Conceptual Change in Biological Science: Evolutionary Developmental Biology, 1981–2011. Dahlem, July 2010. I am grateful to Alan Love for inviting me to the conference and for many instructive conversations; to Henry Bourne, Christopher DiTeresi, James Griesemer, Alan Love, and William C. Wimsatt for comments, suggestions, and help with many complicated problems, and to Scott Gilbert and Nathan Crowe for helpful suggestions. Preparation of this paper was supported in part by NSF for SES-0823125 and SES-0823401. I am grateful to M. Sue Gerson for advice and continuing support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gerson, E.M. (2015). The Interaction of Research Systems in the Evo-devo Juncture. In: Love, A. (eds) Conceptual Change in Biology. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 307. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9412-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9412-1_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9411-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9412-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)