Skip to main content

The Geography of Jewish Intermarriage in Five U.S. Urban Areas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Changing World Religion Map

Abstract

Mixed marriage is arguably the most important social force shaping American Jewish life in the twenty-first century. The relevant sociological literature has examined different kinds of connections between mixed-married couples and the Jewish community, including synagogue membership and how children are raised. No one has yet studied where mixed-married couples live relative vis-à-vis other Jews. I address three questions: (1) to what extent do intermarried couples live near other Jews? Do they live in “core” Jewish areas or do they live far from Jewish population concentrations? (2) How do the sizes of the Jewish population and recent growth trends affect residential patterns? (3) Does living in a “Core” Jewish area have outcomes for intermarried couples? Are they more likely to be engaged in Jewish life as a consequence of living in a Jewish area? This research compares the residential patterns of in-married and mixed-married couples in Los Angeles, Chicago, Baltimore, Atlanta, and Phoenix. The first three have stable Jewish population growth. Atlanta and Phoenix are Sunbelt metro areas experiencing rapid population growth (Jewish and general). Distinct core areas were most visible in the three stable communities. Jewish core areas were less visible in the two rapid growth Sunbelt communities. In all five communities in-married were more likely than mixed-married couples to live in “Core” Jewish areas; the latter were more likely to live in the suburban fringes. Mixed-married couples in “Core” areas were more likely to belong to a synagogue in Baltimore, Atlanta, and Phoenix and those living in zip codes of high Jewish density were more likely to have Jewish friends than those in low-density zip codes. Mixed-married couples in higher Jewish density zip codes were more likely to raise their children in Judaism than those in low Jewish density zip codes on the suburban fringe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Conversionary marriages are treated as in-marriages.

  2. 2.

    http://www.jhsm.org/timeline-1950-present

  3. 3.

    This is the couple rate for the 2000 study. The couple rate for 2010 is 37 %.

  4. 4.

    The dataset submitted to the North American Jewish Data Bank had been corrupted (e.g. cases missing, variables mislabeled, etc.) and did not include sampling weights.

  5. 5.

    These cases are excluded from tabular data presented.

References

  • Abu-Lughod, J. L. (1999). New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: America’s global cities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Associated Jewish Charities of Greater Baltimore. (1968). The Jewish community of Baltimore: A population study. Baltimore: Associated Jewish Charities of Greater Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenkin, A. (1956). Jewish population in the United States, 1955. In The American Jewish year book (pp. 119–130). Philadelphia/New York: Jewish Publication Society and the American Jewish Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenkin, A. (1965). Jewish population in the United States, 1964. In The American Jewish year book (pp. 139–154). Philadelphia/New York: Jewish Publication Society and the American Jewish Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. (1983). The 1983 metropolitan Atlanta Jewish population study. Final report. Atlanta: Atlanta Jewish Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. M. (2006). A tale of two Jewries: The “inconvenient truth” for American Jews. New York: Jewish Life Network/Steinhardt Foundation. Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, M. J., & Dishman, J. D. (Eds.). (2001). From Chicago to LA: Making sense of urban theory. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidman, P., & Weinberg, E. (1983). Chicago Jewish population study, 1982. http://www.jewishdatabank.org/Archive/C-IL-Chicago-1982-Main_Report.pdf

  • Gans, H. (1958). The origin and growth of a Jewish community in the suburbs: A study of the Jews of Park Forest. In M. Sklare (Ed.), The Jews: Social patterns of an American group (pp. 205–248). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. (1965). Assimilation in American life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, P. (1998). Los Angeles Jewish population survey ‘97. Los Angeles: Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles. Printed report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, S. R., Wright, R., Ellis, M., & East, M. (2009). Place, scale and the racial claims made by white-minority parents for their multiracial children in the 1990 census. Ethnic & Racial Studies, 32(3), 522–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, B. J., & Lang, R. E. (2003). Redefining urban and suburban America: Evidence from census 2000 (Brookings metro series). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massarik, F. (1953). A report on the Jewish population of Los Angeles. Los Angeles: Los Angeles Jewish Community Council. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massarik, F. (1968). A report on the Jewish population of Los Angeles, 1968. Los Angeles: Jewish Federation-Council of Greater Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1985). Ethnic residential segregation: A theoretical synthesis and empirical review. Sociology and Social Research, 69, 315–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1985). Spatial assimilation as a socioeconomic outcome. American Sociological Review, 50, 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcdougall, H. (1993). Black Baltimore: A new theory of community. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Jewish Welfare Board. (1947). A study of the Jewish population of Atlanta, Georgia, 1947. Atlanta: National Jewish Welfare Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaides, B. M. (2002). My blue heaven: Life and politics in the working-class suburbs of Los Angeles, 1920–1965. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B. A. (2007a). Faultlines: The seven socio-ecologies of Jewish Los Angeles. In B. Zuckerman & J. Schoenberg (Eds.), The Jewish role in American life: An annual review (Vol. 5, p. 5). Lafayette: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B. A. (2007b). Lakeville revisited: Spatial assimilation among Chicago Jews. Paper presented at the Association for Jewish Studies. Available at: http://www.jewishdatabank.org/Archive/C-IL-Chicago-2001-Spatial_Assimilation_Article.pdf

  • Seligman, B. (1951). Changes in Jewish population in the United States, 1949–50 Jewish population estimates of United States communities (American Jewish yearbook, Vol. 52). Philadelphia/New York: American Jewish Committee and Jewish Publication Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheskin, I. (2004). Geographic differences among American Jews. United Jewish Communities report series on the National Jewish population survey 2000–01 report #8. http://www.jewishdatabank.org/Archive/NJPS2000_Geographic_Differences_Among_American_Jews.pdf

  • Smith, T. W. (2005). Jewish distinctiveness in America, a statistical portrait. New York: American Jewish Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strum, P. (1999). Freedom for speech we hate. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, G. A. (1985). Jewish population study of Greater Baltimore, 1985. Baltimore: Associated Jewish Charities of Great Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukeles Associates Inc. (2004). The Jewish community study of north metro Atlanta: 2004. Atlanta: The Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta in Partnership with the Marcus Jewish Community Center of Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukeles Associates Inc. (2010). The 2010 Greater Baltimore Jewish community study. Baltimore: Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukeles, J., & Miller, R. (2006). The Jewish community centennial study of Greater Atlanta: 2006. Atlanta: The Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Phillips .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Phillips, B. (2015). The Geography of Jewish Intermarriage in Five U.S. Urban Areas. In: Brunn, S. (eds) The Changing World Religion Map. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_171

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics