Abstract
I explore the implications of a view – that children and adults enjoy a markedly different moral and political status, wherein the latter can and should be permitted to make choices as to how they lead their lives, whereas the former should not be permitted to make such choices – for how we think about the relationship between autonomy and welfare, and in particular, in consequence, for how we evaluate paternalism. I discuss the problem of drawing a line and the ‘threshold problem’, and consider how one might, as the UNCRC requires, give a weighted role to the views of the child on matters affecting its own interests.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Archard, D., & Macleod, C. (Eds.). (2002). The moral and political status of children. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Archard, D., & Skivenes, M. (2009a). Hearing the child. Child & Family Social Work, 14(4), 391–399.
Archard, D., & Skivenes, M. (2009b). Balancing a child’s best interest and a child’s views. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 17(1), 1–21.
Arneson, R. (1999). What if anything renders all humans equal? In D. Jamieson (Ed.), Singer and his critics (pp. 103–128). Oxford: Blackwell.
Arneson, R. (2005). Joel Feinberg and the justification of hard paternalism. Legal Theory, 11(3), 259–284.
Brighouse, H. (2003). How should children be heard? Arizona Law Review, 45(Fall), 691–711.
Conly, S. (2013). Against autonomy, justifying coercive paternalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Marneffe, P. (2006). Avoiding paternalism. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 43(1), 68–94.
De Marneffe, P. (2010). Liberalism and prostitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, G. (1972). Paternalism. The Monist, 56, 64–84.
Dworkin, G. (1988). The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1985] 3 All ER 402.
Grille, K. (2009) Anti-paternalism and Public Health Policy. Doctoral thesis in Philosophy, Stockholm, Sweden.
Haworth, L. (1984). Autonomy and utility. Ethics, 95, 5–19.
Kymlicka, W. (1990). Contemporary political philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (Eds.). (2000). Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mental Capacity Act. (2005). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/section/2. Last accessed July 2013.
Mill, J. S. (1969). Utilitarianism [1861]. In J. M. Robson (Ed.), The collected works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. X, essays on ethics, religion and society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mill, J. S. (1989). On liberty [1859]. In S. Collini (Ed.), On liberty’ and other writings (Cambridge texts in the history of political thought). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nedelsky, J. (1989). Reconceiving autonomy: Sources, thoughts, and possibilities. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 1(1), 7–36.
O’Neill, O. (2002). Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Holy Bible. [1611] (1986). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
UNCR (United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child). (1989). http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/crc.htm. Last accessed July 2013.
Wall, S. (1998). Liberalism, perfectionism and restraint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Young, R. (1980). Autonomy and socialisation. Mind 89m, pp. 565–576.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Archard, D. (2015). Children, Adults, Autonomy and Well-Being. In: Bagattini, A., Macleod, C. (eds) The Nature of Children's Well-Being. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9252-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9252-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9251-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9252-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)