Skip to main content

Abstract

Adult tephrids require sugar and protein for survival and for development of eggs, and volatile chemicals from these substances are the basis for food-based lures developed as baits for these pests. In this chapter, we discuss food-based lures that mimic food sources for adults other than host fruit. These have been primarily nitrogen sources that provide the protein needed by adult flies, although non-nitrogen-containing volatile chemicals are also included in this category. After male lures, food-based lures have been the predominant attractants used in traps for tephritid fruit flies. Although typically not as powerful as male lures, food-based lures have several advantages over male-specific attractants. They can be used for species for which there are no male lures known; they capture both females and males of target species; they tend to be female-biased, that is, they capture a higher percentage of females than males; and, at least for the Mediterranean fruit fly, traps baited with food-based lures tend to capture flies earlier than traps baited with male lure. There has been a long history of research on the development of food-based attractants for pest tephritids. Several review articles have documented the early history, which started with investigations of sugar-based food lures and lead to the development of the liquid protein baits and synthetic protein-based food lures, the standard food-lures that are currently in use. In this chapter, we discuss the development of and, as much as possible, the diversity of food-based lures that have been tested and/or are used in traps for pest tephritids. Future research directions are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aluja M, Piñero J (2004) Testing human urine as a low-tech bait for Anastrepha spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) in small guava, mango, sapodilla and grapefruit orchards. Fla Entomol 87:41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1964) Forest Products Laboratory, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. U.S. Forest Service Research Note FPL-065. http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplrn/fplrn065.pdf

  • Anonymous (2006) International panel for review of fruit fly surveillance programs. February 2006. Review of Fruit Fly Surveillance Programs in the United States. USDA/APHIS/PPQ/Fruit Fly Program, Riverdale, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2009) Hydrolysis to hydrolysate. Becton, Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes. http://www.bdbiosciences.com/documents/Hydrolysis_to_Hydrolysate.pdf

  • Anonymous (2011) Protein hydrolysis: acid and alkaline method. http://biotechcrunch.blogspot.com/2011/06/protein-hydrolysis-acid-and-alkaline.html

  • Baker AC, Stone WE, Plummer CC, McPhail M (1944) A review of studies on the Mexican fruitfly and related Mexican species. USDA Misc. Publ. No. 531. 151 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry JD, Polavarapu S (2004) Feeding and attraction of blueberry maggot flies to protein baits, ammonium acetate, and sucrose. J Econ Entomol 97:1269–1277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barry JD, Miller NW, Piñero JC, Tuttle A, Mau RFL, Vargas RI (2006) Effectiveness of protein baits on melon fly and oriental fruit fly: attraction and feeding. J Econ Entomol 99:1161–1167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman MA, Morton TC (1981) The importance of ammonia in proteinaceous attractants for fruit flies (Family: Tephritidae). Aust J Agric Res 32:883–903

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bekatorou A, Psarianos C, Koutinas AA (2006) Production of food grade yeasts. Food Technol Biotechnol 44:407–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher TJ, Ashley RA, Adams RG Jr, Morris TF (2001) Effect of trap position, habitat, and height on the capture of pepper maggot flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Econ Entomol 94:455–461

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce AM, Bartlett BR (1941) Lures for the walnut husk fly. J Econ Entomol 34:318

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Broughton S, de Lima CPF (2002) Field evaluation of female attractants for monitoring Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) under a range of climatic conditions and population levels in Western Australia. J Econ Entomol 95:507–512

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broumas T, Haniotakis GE (1994) Comparative field studies of various traps and attractants of the olive fruit fly. Entomol Exp Appl 73:145–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Bua G (1933) Experimenti del 1933 con sostanze attrattive per la mosca delle olive. Partic R I Super Agric Ann 6:125–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Bua G (1938) Serie di esperimenti con sostanze attractive per la masca delle olive. L’Olivicolt 15:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Burditt AK Jr (1982) Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae) McPhail traps for survey and detection. Fla Entomol 65:367–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrack HJ, Connell JH, Zalom FG (2008) Comparison of olive fruit fly (Bactrocera oleae (Gmelin)) (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures in several commercial traps in California. Intl J Pest Manag 54:227–234. doi:10.1080/09670870801975174

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buttery RG, Ling LC, Teraishi R, Mon TR (1983) Insect attractants: volatiles of hydrolyzed protein insect baits. J Agric Food Chem 31:689–692

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casaña-Giner V, Gandía-Balaguer A, Hernández-Alamós MM, Mengod-Puerta C, Garrido-Vivas A, Primo-Millo J, Primo-Yúfera E (2001) Attractiveness of 79 compounds and mixtures to wild Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in field trials. J Econ Entomol 94:898–904

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castrejón-Gómez VR, Aluja M, Arzuffi R, Villa P (2004) Two low-cost food attractants for capturing Toxotrypana curvicauda (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the field. J Econ Entomol 97:310–315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cha D, Nojuma S, Hesler S, Zhang A, Linn C, Roelofs W, Loeb G (2008) Identification and field evaluation of grape shoot volatiles attractive to female grape berry moth (Paralobesia viteana). J Chem Ecol 34:1180–1189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christenson LE, Foote RE (1960) Biology of fruit flies. Annu Rev Entomol 5:171–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway HE, Forrester OT (2007) Comparison of Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) capture between McPhail traps with torula and MultiLure traps with BioLures in south Texas. Fla Entomol 90:579–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper E (1905) Report of the Commissioner appointed to investigate the prevalence of Trypeta ludens in Mexico. California State Horticultural Commission, Sacramento, 48 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford DL (1927) Investigation of Mexican fruit fly (Anastrepha ludens Loew) in Mexico. Mon Bull Dep Agric State Calif, August:422–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham RT, Nakagawa S, Suda DY, Urago T (1978) Tephritid fruit fly trapping: liquid food baits in high and low rainfall climates. J Econ Entomol 71:762–763

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruyne M, Baker TC (2008) Odor detection in insects: volatile codes. J Chem Ecol 34:882–897

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dean RW (1941) Attraction of Rhagoletis pomonella adults to protein baits. J Econ Entomol 34:123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeMilo AB, Lee C, Moreno DS, Martinez AJ (1996) Identification of volatiles from Citrobacter fermentation of trypticase soy broth. J Agric Food Chem 44:607–612

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Fleischer F, Arredondo J, Flores S, Montoya P, Aluja M (2009) There is no magic fruit fly trap: multiple biological factors influence the response of adult Anastrepha ludens and Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) individuals to MultiLure traps baited with BioLure or NuLure. J Econ Entomol 102:86–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dominiak B (2006) Review of the use of protein food based lures in McPhail traps for monitoring Queensland fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Gen Appl Entomol 35:7–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominiak BC, Gilmour AR, Kerruish B, Whitehead D (2003) Detecting low populations of Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) with McPhail and Lynfield traps. Gen Appl Entomol 32:49–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew RAI, Fay HAC (1988) Comparison of the roles of ammonia and bacterial in the attraction of Dacus tryoni (Froggatt) (Queensland fruit fly) to proteinaceous suspensions. J Plant Prot Trop 5:127–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew RAI, Lloyd AC (1987a) Bacteria associated with fruit flies and their host plants. In: Robinson AS, Hooper GHS (eds) Fruit flies, their biology, natural enemies and control, vol 3A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 131–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew RAI, Lloyd AC (1987b) Relationship of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their bacteria to host plants. Ann Entomol Soc Am 80:629–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew RAI, Yuval B (1999) The evolution of fruit fly feeding behavior. In: Aluja M, Norrbom AL (eds) Fruit Flies (Tephritidae): pylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 731–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew RAI, Courtice AC, Teakle DS (1983) Bacteria as a natural resource of food for adult fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Oecologia (Berl) 60:279–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Duyck PF, Rousse P, Ryckewaert P, Fabre F, Quilici S (2004) Influence of adding borax and modifying pH on effectiveness of food attractants for melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Econ Entomol 97:1137–1141

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Economopoulos AP (1986) Evaluation of color and food-odor trapping methods in the olive fruit fly. In: Mengel M, Carey JR, Plant RE (eds) Pest control: operations and systems analysis in fruit fly management, vol G11, NATO ASI series. Springer, Berlin, pp 111–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Economopoulos AP (2002) Mediterranean fruit fly: attraction/trapping for detection, monitoring and control. Phytoparasitica 30:115–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Economopoulos AP, Raptis A, Stavropoulou-Delivoria A, Papadopoulos A (1986) Control of Dacus oleae by yellow sticky traps combined with ammonium acetate slow-release dispensers. Entomol Exp Appl 41:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Gendy IR (2012) Evaluating attractency of some protein derivatives for the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedmann) and the peach fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata (Saunders). Int J Agric Res 7:185–194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epsky ND, Heath RR, Sivinski JM, Calkins CO, Baranowski RM, Fritz AH (1993) Evaluation of protein bait formulations for the Caribbean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla Entomol 76:626–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Epsky ND, Heath RR, Holler TC, Harris DL, Mullins T (1994) Corn steepwater as protein bait for Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environ Entomol 23:827–831

    Google Scholar 

  • Epsky ND, Heath RR, Guzman A, Meyer WL (1995) Visual cue and chemical cue interactions in a dry trap with food-based synthetic attractant for Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environ Entomol 24:1387–1395

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epsky ND, Dueben BD, Heath RR, Lauzon CR, Prokopy RJ (1997) Attraction of Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae) to volatiles from avian fecal material. Fla Entomol 80:270–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Epsky ND, Heath RR, Dueben BD, Lauzon CR, Proveaux AT, MacCollom GB (1998) Attraction of 3-methyl-1-butanol and ammonia identified from Enterobacter agglomerans to Anastrepha suspensa. J Chem Ecol 24:1867–1880

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epsky ND, Hendrichs J, Katsoyannos BI, Vásquez LA, Ros JP, Zümreoglu A, Pereira R, Bakri A, Seewooruthun SI, Heath RR (1999) Field evaluation of female-targeted trapping systems for Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in seven countries. J Econ Entomol 92:156–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Epsky ND, Kendra PE, Heath RR (2004) Development of lures for detection and delimitation of invasive Anastrepha fruit flies. Proc Caribb Food Crops Soc 39:84–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Epsky ND, Espinoza HR, Kendra PE, Abernathy R, Midgarden D, Heath RR (2010) Effective sampling range of a synthetic food-based attractant for Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Econ Entomol 103:1886–1895

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epsky ND, Kendra PE, Peña JE, Heath RR (2011) Comparison of synthetic food-based lures and liquid protein baits for capture of Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae) adults. Fla Entomol 94:180–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyer JR (1935) Further observations on the attractiveness of esters of the ethyl acetate series to the codling moth. J Econ Entomol 28:940–942

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyer JR, Rhodes H (1931) Preliminary notes on the chemistry of codling moth baits. J Econ Entomol 24:702–711

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eyer JR, Medler JT, Linton HL (1937) Analysis of attractant factors in fermenting baits used for codling moth. J Econ Entomol 30:750–756

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fabre F, Ryckewaert P, Duyck PF, Chiroleu F, Quilici S (2003) Comparison of the efficacy of different food attractants and their concentration for melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Econ Entomol 96:231–2003

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finney GL (1948) Culturing Chrysopa californica and obtaining eggs for field distribution. J Econ Entomol 41:719–721

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney GL (1950) Mass-culturing Chrysopa californica to obtain eggs for field distribution. J Econ Entomol 43:97–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Flath RA, Matsumoto KE, Binder RG, Cunningham RT, Mon RT (1989) Effect of pH on the volatiles of hydrolyzed protein insect baits. J Agric Food Chem 37:814–819

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher BS, Kapatos E (1981) Dispersal of the olive fly, Dacus oleae, during the summer period on Corfu. Entomol Exp Appl 29:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Frick KE (1952) Determining emergence of the cherry fruit fly with ammonium carbonate bait traps. J Econ Entomol 45:262–263

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frost SW (1926) Bait-pails as a possible control for the oriental fruit moth. J Econ Entomol 19:441–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost SW (1937) Tests on baits for oriental fruit moths, 1936. J Econ Entomol 30:693–695

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González Techera A, Jubany S, Carrau FM, Gaggero C (2001) Differentiation of industrial wine yeast strains using microsatellite markers. Lett Appl Microbiol 33:71–75. doi:10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00946.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gow PL (1954) Proteinaceous bait for the Oriental fruit fly. J Econ Entomol 47:153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Green N, Beroza M, Hall SA (1960) Recent developments in chemical attractants for insects. Adv Pest Control Res 3:129–179

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grout TG, Daneel JH, Ware AB, Beck RR (2011) A comparison of monitoring systems used for Ceratitis species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in South Africa. Crop Prot 30:617–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney WB (1925) The control of fruit fly. In Agric. Gazette of New South Wales, December, 1995, Sydney, pp. 879–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen KS (1950) Fecundity of Chrysopa californica as affected by synthetic foods. J Econ Entomol 43:101–104

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen KS, Finney GL (1950) A food supplement for effectively increasing the fecundity of certain tephritid species. J Econ Entomol 43:735

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall DG, Burns RE, Jenkins CC, Hibbard KL, Harris DL, Sivinski JM, Nigg HN (2005) Field comparison of chemical attractants and traps for Caribbean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Florida citrus. J Econ Entomol 98:1641–1647

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haniotakis GE, Skyrianos G (1981) Attraction of the olive fruit fly to pheromone, McPhail, and color traps. J Econ Entomol 74:58–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Haniotakis GE, Vassiliou-Waite A (1987) Effect of combining food and sex attractants on the capture of Dacus oleae flies. Entomol Hellenica 5:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath RR, Manukian A, Epsky ND, Sivinski J, Calkins CO, Landolt PJ (1993) A bioassay system for collecting volatiles while simultaneously attracting tephritid fruit flies. J Chem Ecol 19:2395–2410

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heath RR, Epsky ND, Bloem S, Bloem K, Acajabon F, Guzman A, Chambers D (1994) pH effect on the attractiveness of a corn hydrolysate to the Mediterranean fruit fly, and several Anastrepha species (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Econ Entomol 87:1008–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath RR, Epsky ND, Guzman A, Dueben BD, Manukian A, Meyer WL (1995) Development of a dry plastic insect trap with food-based synthetic attractant for the Mediterranean and the Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Econ Entomol 88:1307–1315

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath RR, Epsky ND, Jimenez A, Landolt PJ, Dueben BD, Meyer WL, Aluja M, Rizzo J, Camin M, Jeronimo F, Baranowski R (1996) Development of an improved pheromone based system to monitor papaya fruit flies Toxotrypana curvicauda Gerstaecker. Fla Entomol 79:37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath RR, Epsky ND, Dueben BD, Rizzo J, Felipe J (1997) Adding methyl-substituted ammonia derivatives to food-based synthetic attractant on capture of the Mediterranean and Mexican fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Econ Entomol 90:1584–1589

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heath RR, Epsky ND, Midgarden D, Katsoyannos B (2004) Efficacy of 1,4- diaminobutane (putrescine) in a food-based synthetic attractant for capture of Mediterranean and Mexican fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Econ Entomol 97:1126–1131

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrichs J, Hendrichs MA (1990) Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in nature: location and diel pattern of feeding and other activities on fruiting and nonfruiting hosts and nonhosts. Ann Entomol Soc Am 83:632–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrichs J, Reyes J, Aluja M (1989) Behaviour of female and male Mediterranean fruit flies, Ceratitis capitata, in and around Jackson traps placed on fruiting host trees. Insect Sci Appl 10:285–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill AR (1986) Reduction in trap captures of female fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) when synthetic male lures are added. J Aust Entomol Soc 25:211–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson AC (1943) Lures attractive to the apple maggot. J Econ Entomol 36:545–548

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson AC (1948) Further studies on lures attractive to the apple maggot. J Econ Entomol 41:61–68

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holler T, Sivinski J, Jenkins C, Fraser S (2006) A comparison of yeast hydrolysate and synthetic food attractants for capture of Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla Entomol 89:419–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler T, Peebles M, Young A, Whiteman L, Olson S, Sivinski J (2009) Efficacy of the Suterra BioLure individual female fruit fly attractant packages vs. the unipak version. Fla Entomol 92:667–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull CD, Cribb BW (2001) Olfaction in the Queensland fruit fly. Bactrocera tryoni. I: Identification of olfactory receptor neuron types responding to environmental odors. J Chem Ecol 27:871–887

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (1999) Development of female medfly attractant systems for trapping and sterility assessment, IAEA-TECDOC-1099. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 228 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (2003) Trapping guidelines for area-wide fruit fly programmes. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 47 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (2007) Development of improved attractants and their integration into fruit fly SIT, IAEA-TECDOC-1574. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 230 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson M, Keiser I, Harris EJ, Miyashita DH (1976) Impurities in cue-lure attractive to female Tephritidae. J Agric Food Chem 24:782–783

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jang EB, Nishida KA (1990) Identification and attractancy of bacteria associated with Dacus dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environ Entomol 19:1726–1731

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang EB, Light DM, Dickens JC, McGovern TP, Nagata JT (1989a) Electroantennogram responses of Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) to trimedlure and its trans isomers. J Chem Ecol 15:2219–2231

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jang EB, Light DM, Flath RA, Nagata JT, Mon TR (1989b) Electroantennogram responses of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata to identified volatile constituents from calling males. Entomol Exp Appl 50:7–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jang EB, Holler TC, Moses AL, Salvato MH, Frazer S (2007) Evaluation of a single-matrix food attractant tephritid fruit fly bait dispenser for use in federal trap detection programs. Proc Hawaiian Entomol Soc 39:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis H (1931) Experiments with a new fruit fly lure. Qld Agric J 36:758–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins DA, Kendra PE, Epsky ND, Montgomery WS, Heath RR, Jenkins DM, Goenaga RJ (2012) Antennal responses of West Indian and Caribbean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) to ammonium bicarbonate and putrescine lures. Fla Entomol 95:28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsoyannos BI (1994) Evaluation of Mediterranean fruit fly traps for use in sterile-insect-technique programmes. J Appl Entomol 118:442–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsoyannos BI, Papadopoulos NT, Kouloussis NA, Heath RR, Hendrichs J (1999) Method of assessing the fertility of wild C. capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) females for use in sterile insect technique programs. J Econ Entomol 92:590–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsoyannos BI, Papadopoulos NT, Stavridis D (2000) Evaluation of trap types and food attractants for Rhagoletis cerasi (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Econ Entomol 93:1005–1010

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keiser I, Wakabayashi N (1981) Fermentation per se as a biological slow delivery mechanism for releasing cofactors of fruit fly attractants. In: Lee PI, Lewis DH (eds) Controlled release of pesticide and pharmaceuticals. Plenum Press, New York, pp 295–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiser I, Jacobson MJ, Nakagawa S, Miyashita DH, Harris EJ (1976) Mediterranean fruit fly: attraction of females to acetic acid and acetic anyhydride, to two chemical intermediates in the manufacture of cue-lure, and to decaying Hawaiian tephritids. J Econ Entomol 69:517–520

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kendra PE, Vázquez A, Epsky ND, Heath RR (2005a) Ammonia and carbon dioxide: quantitation and electroantennogram responses of Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environ Entomol 34:569–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendra PE, Montgomery WS, Mateo DM, Puche H, Epsky ND, Heath RR (2005b) Effect of age on EAG response and attraction of female Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae) to ammonia and carbon dioxide. Environ Entomol 34:584–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendra PE, Montgomery WS, Epsky ND, Heath RR (2006) Assessment of female reproductive status in Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla Entomol 89:144–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendra PE, Epsky ND, Heath RR (2008) Response of Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae) to terminal diamines in a food-based synthetic attractant. Environ Entomol 37:1119–1125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendra PE, Montgomery WS, Epsky ND, Heath RR (2009) Electroantennogram and behavioral responses of Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae) to putrescine and ammonium bicarbonate lures. Environ Entomol 38:1259–1266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kendra PE, Epsky ND, Heath RR (2010) Effective sampling range of food-based attractants for female Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Econ Entomol 103:533–540

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kouloussis NA, Papadopoulos NT, Müller H, Wang J, Mao M, Katsoyannos BI, Duyck P, Carey JR (2009) Life table assay of field-caught Mediterranean fruit flies, Ceratitis capitata, reveals age bias. Entomol Exp Appl 132:172–181

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kouloussis NA, Papadopoulos NT, Katsoyannos BI, Müller H, Wang J, Su Y, Molleman F, Carey JR (2011) Seasonal trends in Ceratitis capitata reproductive potential derived from live-caught females in Greece. Entomol Exp Appl 140:181–188

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lauzon CR, Sjogren RE, Wright SE, Prokopy RJ (1998) Attraction of Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae) flies to odor of bacteria: apparent confinement to specialized members of Enterobacteriaceae. Environ Entomol 27:853–857

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauzon CR, Sjogren RE, Prokopy RJ (2000) Enzymatic capabilities of bacteria associated with apple maggot flies: a postulated role in attraction. J Chem Ecol 26:953–967

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc L, Vargas RI, Rubinoff D (2010a) Captures of pest fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and nontarget insects in BioLure and torula yeast traps in Hawaii. Environ Entomol 39:1626–1630

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc L, Vargas RI, Rubinoff D (2010b) Attraction of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) and endemic and introduced nontarget insects to BioLure bait and its individual components in Hawaii. Environ Entomol 39:989–998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc L, Vargas RI, Rubinoff D (2010c) A comparison of nontarget captures in BioLure and liquid protein bait lures in Hawaii. Proc Hawaiian Entomol Soc 42:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, DeMilo AB, Moreno DS, Martinez AJ (1995) Analysis of the volatile components of a bacterial fermentation that is attractive to the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens. J Agric Food Chem 43:1348–1351

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, DeMilo AB, Moreno DS, Mangan RL (1997) Identification of the volatile components of E802 Mazoferm steepwater, a condensed fermented corn extractive highly attractive to the Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Agric Food Chem 45:2327–2331

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liburd OE, Alm SR, Casagrande RA, Polavarapu S (1998) Effect of trap color, bait, shape, and orientation in attraction of blueberry maggot (Diptera: Tephritidae) flies. J Econ Entomol 91:243–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Light DM, Jang EB (1987) Electroantennogram responses of the oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis, to a spectrum of alcohol and aldehyde plant volatiles. Entomol Exp Appl 45:55–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Light DM, Jang EB, Dickens JC (1988) Electrontennogram responses of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata, to a spectrum of plant volatiles. J Chem Ecol 14:159–180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liquido NJ, Teranishi R, Kint S (1993) Increasing the efficiency of catching Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) males in trimedlure-baited traps traps with ammonia. J Econ Entomol 86:1700–1705

    Google Scholar 

  • López DF, Becerril OH (1967) Sodium borate inhibits decomposition of two protein hydrolysates attractive to the Mexican fruit fly. J Econ Entomol 60:137–140

    Google Scholar 

  • López DF, Spishakoff LM, Hernández O (1968) Pelletized lures for trapping the Mexican fruit fly. J Econ Entomol 61:316–317

    Google Scholar 

  • López-D F, Steiner LF, Holbrook FR (1971) A new yeast hydrolysate-borax bait for trapping the Caribbean fruit fly. J Econ Entomol 64:1541–1543

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Guillén G, Cruz López L, Malo EA, Rojas JC (2011) Olfactory responses of Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) to volatiles emitted by calling males. Fla Entomol 94:874–881

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCollom GB, Lauzon CR, Weires RW Jr, Rutkowski AA (1992) Attraction of adult apple maggot (Diptera: Tephritidae) to microbial isolates. J Econ Entomol 85:83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCollom GB, Lauzon CR, Payne EB, Currier WW (1994) Apple maggot (Diptera: Tephrididae) trap enhancement with washed bacterial cells. Environ Entomol 23:354–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Malavasi A, Duarte AL, Cabrini G, Engelstein M (1990) Field evaluation of three baits for South American cucurbit fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) using McPhail traps. Fla Entomol 73:510–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Malo EA (1992) Effect of bait decomposition time on capture of Anastrepha fruit flies. Fla Entomol 75:272–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangan RL, Thomas DB (2014) Comparison of torula yeast and various grape juice products as attractants for Mexican fruit fly (Anastrepha ludens (Loew)). J Econ Entomol 107:591–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Manrakhan A, Kotze C (2012) Attraction of Ceratitis capitata, C. rosa and C. cosyra (Diptera: Tephritidae) to proteinaceous baits. J. Appl Entomol 135:98–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez AJ, Robacker DC, Garcia JA, Esau KL (1994) Laboratory and field olfactory attraction of the Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) to metabolites of bacterial species. Fla Entomol 77:117–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez AJ, Salinas EJ, Rendon P (2007) Capture of Anastrepha species (Diptera: Tephritidae) with MultiLure traps and BioLure attractants in Guatemala. Fla Entomol 90:258–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto KE, Buttery RG, Flath RA, Mon TR, Teranishi R (1985) Protein hydrolysate volatiles as insect attractants. In: Hedin PA (ed) Bioregulators of pest control, ACS symposium series. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 353–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer MS (2001) Nomographic correspondence between specialist cell responses, electroantennograms and the probability of behavioral response: the importance of comparable stimuli and a benchmark. J Insect Physiol 47:19–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mazor M (2009) Competitiveness of fertilizers with proteinaceous baits applied in Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata Wied. (Diptera: Tephritidae) control. Crop Prot 28:314–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazor M, Gothilf S, Galun R (1987) The role of ammonia in the attraction of females of the Mediterranean fruit fly to protein hydrolyzate baits. Entomol Exp Appl 43:25–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McPhail M (1939) Protein lures for fruit flies. J Econ Entomol 32:758–761

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McPhail M (1943) Linseed oil soap – a new lure for the melon fly. J Econ Entomol 36:426–429

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Midgarden D, Ovalle O, Epsky ND, Puche H, Kendra PE, Rendon P, Heath RR (2004) Capture of Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in dry traps baited with a food-based attractant and Jackson traps baited with trimedlure during sterile male release in Guatemala. J Econ Entomol 97:2137–2143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda MA, Alonso R, Alemany A (2001) Field evaluation of medfly (Dipt., Tephritidae) female attractants in a Mediterranean agrosystem (Balearic Islands, Spain). J Appl Entomol 125:333–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore RC (1969) Attractiveness of baited and unbaited lures to apple maggot and beneficial flies. J Econ Entomol 62:1076–1078

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno DS, Mangan RL (1995) Responses of the Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) to two hydrolyzed proteins and incorporation of Phloxine B to kill adults. In: ACS Symposium Series Number 616, pp 257–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno DS, Mangan RL (2002) A bait matrix for novel toxicants for use in control of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). In: Hallman G, Schwalbe CP (eds) Invasive arthropods in agriculture. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 333–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno DS, Celedonio H, Mangan RL, Zavala JL, Montoya P (2001) Field evaluation of a phototoxic dye, phloxine b, against three species of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) J Econ Entomol 94:1419–1427

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton TC, Bateman MA (1981) Chemical studies on proteinaceous attractants for fruit flies, including the identification of volatile constituents. Aust J Agric Res 32:905–916

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moustafa SA (2009) Response of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) and peach fruit fly, Bacrocera zonata (Saund.) to some food attractants. Egypt Acad J Biol Sci 2:111–118. http://entomology.eajbs.eg.net/pdf/vol2-num2/10.pdf

  • Nakagawa S, Chambers DL, Urago T, Cunningham RT (1971) Trap-lure combinations for surveys of Mediterranean fruit flies in Hawaii. J Econ Entomol 64:1211–1213

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro-Llopis V, Alfaro F, Domínguez J, Sanchis J, Primo J (2008) Evaluation of traps and lures for mass trapping of Mediterranean fruit fly in citrus groves. J Econ Entomol 101:126–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newell W (1936) Progress report on the Key West (Florida) fruit fly eradication project. J Econ Entomol 29:116–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman LJ, O’Connor BA (1931) Fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata). A further series of trapping or luring experiments. J Dep Agric West Aust 8(2):316–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Niogret J, Montgomery WS, Kendra PE, Heath RR, Epsky ND (2011) Attraction and electroantennogram responses of male Mediterranean fruit fly to volatile chemicals from Persea, Litchi, and Ficus wood. J Chem Ecol 37:483–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos NT, Katsoyannos BI, Kouloussis NA, Hendrichs J, Carey JR, Heath RR (2001) Early detection and population monitoring of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a mixed-fruit orchard in northern Greece. J Econ Entomol 94:971–978

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins FA, Hines HJ (1934) A note on some preliminary experiments with ammonia as a lure for the Queensland fruit fly (Chaetodacus tryoni Frogg). R Soc Qld Proc 45:29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson A (1924) Some chemicals attractive to adults of the onion maggot, (Hylemyia antique Meig.) and the seed corn maggot (Hylemyia cilicrura Rond.). J Econ Entomol 17:87–94

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson A (1925) A bait which attracts the oriental peach moth (Laspeyresia molesta Busck). J Econ Entomol 18:181–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Piñero J, Aluja M, Vázquez A, Equihua M, Varón J (2003) Human urine and chicken feces as fruit fly (Dipera: Tephritidae) attractants for resource-poor fruit growers. J Econ Entomol 96:334–340

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy RJ, Economopoulos AP (1975) Attraction of laboratory-cultured and wild Dacus oleae flies to sticky-coated McPhail traps of different colors and odors. Environ Entomol 4:187–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy RJ, Hsu CL, Vargas RI (1993) Effect of source and condition of animal excrement on attractiveness to adults of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environ Entomol 22:453–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, D. 1998. The phenology of the fig fly and its control. International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS) Acta Hort. 480:207–208 http://www.actahort.org/books/480/480_35.htm

  • Reissig WH (1974) Field tests of traps and lures for the apple maggot. J Econ Entomol 67:484–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Reissig WH (1976) Comparison of traps and lures for Rhagoletis fausta and R. cinculata. J Econ Entomol 69:639–643

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson CH (1916) The attraction of Diptera to ammonia. Ann Entomol Soc Am 9:408–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Robacker DC (1995) Attractiveness of a mixture of ammonia, methylamine and putrescine to Mexican fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a citrus orchard. Fla Entomol 78:571–578

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robacker DC (2001) Roles of putrescine and 1-pyrroline in attractiveness of technical-grade putrescine to the Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla Entomol 84:679–685

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robacker DC, Bartelt RJ (1997) Chemicals attractive to Mexican fruit fly from Klebsiella pneumonia and Citrobacter freundii cultures sampled by solid-phase microextraction. J Chem Ecol 23:2897–2915

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robacker DC, Czokajlo D (2006) Effect of propylene glycol antifreeze on captures of Mexican fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in traps baited with BioLures and AFF lures. Fla Entomol 89:286–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Robacker DC, Flath RA (1995) Attractants from Staphylococcus aureus cultures for Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens. J Chem Ecol 21:1861–1874

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robacker DC, Landolt PJ (2002) Importance and use of attractants. In: Hallman GJ, Schwalbe CP (eds) Invasive arthropods in agriculture. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 169–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Robacker DC, Lauzon CR (2002) Purine metabolizing capability of Enterobacter agglomerans affects volatiles production and attractiveness to Mexican fruit fly. J Chem Ecol 28:1549–1563

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robacker DC, Thomas DB (2007) Comparison of two synthetic food-odor lures for captures of feral Mexican fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Mexico and implications regarding use of irradiated flies to assess lure efficacy. J Econ Entomol 100:1147–1152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robacker DC, Warfield WC (1993) Attraction of both sexes of the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens, to a mixture of ammonia, methylamine, and putrescine. J Chem Ecol 19:2999–3016

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robacker DC, Chapa BE, Hart WG (1986) Electroantennograms of Mexican fruit flies to chemicals produced by males. Entomol Exp Appl 40:123–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Robacker DC, Garcia JA, Martinez AJ, Kaufman MG (1991) Strain of Staphylococcus attractive to laboratory strain Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 84:555–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Robacker DC, Moreno DS, DeMilo AB (1996) Attractiveness to Mexican fruit flies of combinations of acetic acid with ammonium/amino attractants with emphasis on effects of hunger. J Chem Ecol 22:499–511

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robacker DC, Martinez AJ, Garcia JA, Bartelt RJ (1998) Volatiles attractive to the Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) from eleven bacteria taxa. Fla Entomol 81:497–508

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robacker DC, Garcia JA, Bartelt RJ (2000) Volatiles from duck feces attractive to Mexican fruit fly. J Chem Ecol 26:1849–1867

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robacker DC, Lauzon CR, Patt J, Margara F, Sacchetti P (2009) Attraction of Mexican fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) to bacteria: effects of culturing medium on odour volatiles. J Appl Entomol 133:155–163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roys C (1954) Olfactory nerve potentials as a direct measure of chemoreception in insects. Ann NY Acad Sci 58:250–255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MF (2002) Insect Chemoreception: Fundamental and Applied. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanbhag S, Muller B, Steinbrecht A (1999) Atlas of olfactory organs of Drosophila melanogaster. 1. Types, external organization, innervations and distribution of olfactory sensilla. Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 28:377–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Simanton WA (1958) Studies of Mediterranean fruit fly lures in Florida. J Econ Entomol 51:679–682

    Google Scholar 

  • Stange G (1999) Carbon dioxide is a close-range oviposition attractant in the Queensland fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni. Naturwissenschaften 86:190–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Starr DF, Shaw JG (1944) Pyridine as an attractant for the Mexican fruitfly. J Econ Entomol 37:760–763

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner LF (1952) Fruit fly control in Hawaii with poisoned-bait sprays containing protein hydrolysates. J Econ Entomol 45:838–843

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steyskal GC (1977) History and use of the McPhail trap. Fla Entomol 60:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DB (2003) Nontarget insects captured in fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) surveillance traps. J Econ Entomol 96:1732–1737

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DB, Robacker DC (2006) Trapping for Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) with torula yeast and propylene glycol. Subtrop Plant Sci 58:24–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DB, Holler TC, Heath RR, Salina EJ, Moses AL (2001) Trap-lure combinations for surveillance of Anastrepha fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla Entomol 84:344–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DB, Epsky ND, Serra CA, Hall DG, Kendra PE, Heath RR (2008) Ammonia formulations and capture of Anastrepha fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Entomol Sci 43:76–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Tóth M, Nobili P, Tabilio R, Ujáry I (2004) Interference between male-targeted and female-targeted lures of the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Dipt., Tephritidae) in Italy. J Appl Entomol 128:64–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Univ. Waikato (New Zealand Biotechnology Learning Hub – the University of Waikato) (2007) http://www.biotechlearn.org.nz/focus_stories/mining_milk/hydrolysis_of_protein

  • Vargas RI, Prokopy R (2006) Attraction and feeding response of melon flies and oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) to various protein baits with and without toxicants. Proc Hawaiian Entomol Soc 38:49–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Villamil SC (2012) Behaviors related to reproduction of the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae), in Northern California. Dissertation, Univ. of California-Davis, 66 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakabayashi N, Cunningham RT (1991) Four-component synthetic food bait for attracting both sexes of the melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Econ Entomol 84:1672–1676

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yee WL, Landolt PJ, Darnell TJ (2005) Attraction of Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae) and nontarget flies to traps baited with ammonium carbonate and fruit volatile lures in Washington and Oregon. J Agric Urban Entomol 22:133–149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yetter WP, Steiner LF (1931) A preliminary report on large-scale bait trapping of the oriental fruit moth in Indiana and Georgia. J Econ Entomol 24:1181–1197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yokoyama VY, Miller GT, Stewart-Leslie J, Rice RE, Phillips PA (2006) Olive fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) populations in relation to region, trap type, season, and availability of fruit. J Econ Entomol 99:2072–2079

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zervas GA (1982) A new long-life trap for olive fruit fly, Dacus oleae (Gmelin) (Diptera, Tephritidae) and other Diptera. J Appl Entomol 94:522–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Zervas GA (1987) Trapping Mediterranean fruit flies in Delta and McPhail traps in the field. In: Economopoulos AP (ed) Fruit Flies: Proc. 2nd Intl. Symp., 16–21 Sept. 1986, Crete, Greece. Elsevier, New York, pp 475–481

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Robert Mangan (USDA/ARS, Weslaco, TX and Miami, FL) for valuable discussions on this topic and for access to documents from the USDA Bureau of Entomology laboratory that was located in Mexico City, Mexico, that chronicled the research on food-based baits for A. ludens. This included original reports and an unpublished manuscript by M. McPhail. We also thank Robert Heath (USDA/ARS, Miami, FL, deceased) for his mentorship and for introducing the authors to research on food-based fruit fly attractants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy D. Epsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Epsky, N.D., Kendra, P.E., Schnell, E.Q. (2014). History and Development of Food-Based Attractants. In: Shelly, T., Epsky, N., Jang, E., Reyes-Flores, J., Vargas, R. (eds) Trapping and the Detection, Control, and Regulation of Tephritid Fruit Flies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9193-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics