Abstract
In this chapter, three basic approaches to medicine are examined. The biological reductionistic model is criticized commonly but it is found to have important merits. The biopsychosocial (BPS) model is praised commonly but it is found to have many limitations. The BPS model is seen as representing eclecticism, which in turn represents a relativism about truth which is part of current cultural mores. Both perspectives are examined in the context of the history of medicine, where two basic tendencies are identified: the Galenic and Hippocratic approaches. The Galenic approach is based on biological speculation and is holistic and individualized to the patient. It held sway for most of recorded human history but caused much suffering through its false ideology. The Hippocratic approach is parroted but little understood: it is based on clinical observation, refusal to treat symptoms, and a commitment to identifying diseases. It is biologically reductionistic but humanistic. The evolution of modern medical breakthroughs, such as the antibiotic revolution, is seen as reflecting a rejection of Galenic models for Hippocratic ones. The BPS model is seen as a return to Galenic assumptions. A medical humanist model for the future, based on Hippocratic foundations and revised by awareness of the strengths and limitations of biological reductionism, is proposed.
References
Bliss M (1999) William Osler: a life in medicine. Oxford University Press, New York
Engel GL (1977) The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 196(80):129–136
Engel GL (1980) The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry 137:535–544
Foucault M (2001) Madness and civilization: a history of insanity in the age of reason. Routledge, London
Gabbard GO, Kay J (2001) The fate of integrated treatment: whatever happened to the biopsychosocial psychiatrist? Am J Psychiatry 158:1956–1963
Ghaemi SN (2008) Toward a Hippocratic psychopharmacology. Can J Psychiatry 53:189–196
Ghaemi SN (2010) The rise and fall of the biopsychosocial model: reconciling art and science in psychiatry. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore
Ghaemi N (2013) On depression: diagnosis, drugs and despair in the modern world. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore
Hill AB (1971) Principles of medical statistics, 9th edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Holmes OW (1891) Currents and counter-currents in medical science. Medical essays 1842−1882. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston
Jones WHS (1931) The works of Hippocrates
Jouanna J (1999) Hippocrates. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Kerson TS (1987) Clinical social work in health care: new biopsychosocial approaches. Health Soc Work 12:77–78
Low G (1999) Thomas Sydenham: the English Hippocrates. Aust N Z J Surg 69:258–262
McHugh PR (2006) Hippocrates a la mode. In: The mind has mountains. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore
Mojtabai R, Olfson M (2010) National trends in psychotropic medication polypharmacy in office-based psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry 67:26–36
Nutton V (2001) Hippocrates of Cos. In: Encyclopedia of life sciences. John Wiley and Sons. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0002519
Osler W (1912) The principles and practice of medicine. D. Appleton and Company, New York
Osler W (1932) Aequanimitas, 3rd edn. The Blakiston Company, Philadelphia
Pormann P, Savage-Smith E (2007) Medieval Islamic medicine. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC
Porter R (1999) The greatest benefit to mankind: a medical history of humanity. Norton, New York
Shorter E (1997) A history of psychiatry. Wiley, New York
Stigler S (1986) A history of statistics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Temkin O (1973) Galenism: rise and decline of a medical philosophy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Temkin O (2002) On second thought and other essays in the history of medicine and science. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Thomas L (1995) The youngest science. Penguin, New York
Weiss RJ (1980) The biopsychosocial model and primary care. Psychosom Med 42:123–130
Wootton D (2007) Bad medicine: doctors doing harm since Hippocrates. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Yankauer A (1996) Pierre Charles-Alexandre Louis: the impact of a clinical trial. Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc 59:15–19
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ghaemi, S.N. (2017). Biomedical Reductionist, Humanist, and Biopsychosocial Models in Medicine. In: Schramme, T., Edwards, S. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8688-1_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8688-1_38
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8687-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8688-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities