Skip to main content

How to Protect “Human Nature” – By Human Dignity, Human Rights or with “Species-Ethics” Argumentations?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Rights and Human Nature

Part of the book series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ((IUSGENT,volume 35))

Abstract

Georg Lohmann turns his attention to the current developments of medical genetic engineering that change the methodical attitude towards human nature and also express a change in the evaluation of human nature. In his contribution How to protect “human nature” – by human dignity, human rights or with “species-ethics” argumentations? Lohmann asks if we could or should protect human nature by human dignity and human rights, or if we need other normative standards. To find an answer he is testing the hypothesis that human nature can be protected by human rights and the “untouchability” (Unantastbarkeit) of human dignity. After having discussed the argumentations of Jürgen Habermas, Lohman examines three normative arguments for the undisposabilty (Unverfügbarkeit) of the human nature and compares Habermas’ species-ethical argument for the undisposabilty of human nature to similar “post-metaphysical” challenges like an intercultural understanding of human dignity as a justified principle of human rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In German “unverletztlich” (inviolable) is different than “unantastbar”; therefore, here I use the literal translation “untouchable”.

  2. 2.

    Compare the still excellent artical “Natur” of Hager (1984).

  3. 3.

    Cf. Ritter et al. (1984, col. 421); Oxford dictionaries also distinguishes two basic meanings: (1): “the phenomena of the physical world collectively, including plants, animals, the landscape, and other features and products of the earth, as opposed to humans or human creations”; (2): “the basic or inherent features, character, or qualities of something”.

References

  • Birnbacher, D. 2002. Habermas’ ehrgeiziges Beweisziel – erreicht oder verfehlt? Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 50: 121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A., D.W. Brock, N. Daniels, and D. Wikler. 2000. From chance to choice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1958. Anthropologie. In Philosophie, ed. A. Diemer and I. Frenzel. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 2002. Replik auf Einwände. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 50: 296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 2003. The future of human nature. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 2005. Ich selber bin ja ein Stück Natur” – Adorno über die Naturverflochtenheit der Vernunft. Überlegungen zum Verhältnis von Freiheit und Unverfügbarkeit. In Dialektik der Freiheit. Frankfurter Adorno-Konferenz, ed. A. Honneth, 13–40. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 2012. Nachmetaphysisches Denken II. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hager, F.P. 1984. Art. Natur. In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie (6), ed. J. Ritter et al. Basel: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, G. 2003. On the relation between moral, juridical and evaluative justifications of Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD). Ethical Perspectives, Journal of the European Ethics Network 10(3–4, Leuven): 196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, G. 2004. Unantastbare Menschenwürde und unverfügbare menschliche Natur. In Menschenwürde. La Dignité de l’ etre humain, Studia Philosophica Vol. 63. Jahrbuch der schweizerischen philosophischen Gesellschaft, ed. E. Angehrn and B. Baertsch, 55–75. Basel: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, G. 2008. Evaluations of the inner and outer nature of humans within biotechnology. A request towards Chinese colleagues. In The ethics of today’s science and technology. A German-Chinese approach, ed. Wenchao Li and H. Poser, 224–231. Berlin: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, G. 2010a. Kulturelle Besonderung und Universalisierung der Menschenrechte. In Universelle Menschenrechte und partikulare Moral, ed. G. Ernst and S. Sellmaier, 33–47. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, G. 2010b. Zur moralischen, juridischen und politischen Dimension der Menschenrechte. In Recht und Moral, ed. H.J. Sandkühler, 135–150. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, G. 2011a. ‘Menschenwürde’ – formale und inhaltliche Bestimmungen. In Menschenwürde und moderne Medizintechnik, ed. J.C. Joerden, E. Hilgendorf, N. Petrillo, and F. Thiele, 151–160. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, G. 2011b. Menschenwürde als, soziale Imagination‘. Über den geschichtlichen Sinn der Deklaration der Menschenrechte und Menschenwürde nach 1945. In Facetten der Menschenwürde, ed. N. Knoepffler, P. Kunzmann, and M. O’Malley, 54–74. Freiburg/München: Alber Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, G. 2012a. Interkulturalismus und ‘cross-culture’. In Menschenrechte. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch, ed. A. Pollmann and G. Lohmann, 210–215. Stuttgart/Weimar: J.B. Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, G. 2012b. Umweltzerstörung. In Menschenrechte. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch, ed. A. Pollmann and G. Lohmann, 438–443. Stuttgart/Weimar: J.B. Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, G. 2013. Individuelle Menschenrechte und Pflichten zugunsten von Gemeinschaften. In Transkulturalität der Menschenrechte: Arabische, chinesische und europäische Perspektiven, ed. P. Brunozzi, S. Dhouib, and W. Pfannkuche, 147–170. Freiburg/München: Alber Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plessner, H. 1981. Die Stufen des Organischen. In Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. IV, ed. H. Plessner. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, J., et al. (eds.). 1984. Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 6. Basel: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siep, L. 2002. Moral und Gattungswesen. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 50: 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Lohmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lohmann, G. (2014). How to Protect “Human Nature” – By Human Dignity, Human Rights or with “Species-Ethics” Argumentations?. In: Albers, M., Hoffmann, T., Reinhardt, J. (eds) Human Rights and Human Nature. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 35. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8672-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics