Skip to main content

Methodological Issues in Positive Psychology Research with Diverse Populations: Exploring Strengths Among Chinese Adults

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perspectives on the Intersection of Multiculturalism and Positive Psychology

Abstract

In this chapter, we will discuss some issues in multicultural positive psychology research. A general discussion on common methodological issues will be provided first. We will then discuss the following four methodological issues: linguistic equivalence, conceptual equivalence, metric equivalence, and functional equivalence. Linguistic equivalence is achieved if all items of two questionnaires in different languages have identical meanings. Conceptual equivalence refers to whether the same concept represents the same set of behaviour in different cultures. Metric equivalence focuses on the psychometric properties of the same questionnaire in different language versions. Functional equivalence refers to whether the same behaviour or concept plays the same function role in different cultures. Our research on well-being (happiness), posttraumatic growth, and character strengths among Chinese adults will be used for illustration. Since positive psychology is developed in the era of globalization, there is the need to better understand the nuances of culture and positive psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berry, J. W. (1980). Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In A. M. Padilla (Ed.), Acculturation: Theory, models and some new findings (pp. 9–25). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunet, J., McDonough, M. H., Hadd, V., Crocker, P. R. E., & Sabiston, C. M. (2010). The posttraumatic growth inventory: An examination of the factor structure and invariance among breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 19, 830–838. doi:10.1002/pon.1640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., & Davey, G. (2008). Happiness and subjective wellbeing in Mainland China. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 589–600. doi:10.1007/s10902-008-9092-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, F. M. (2002). Universal and indigenous dimensions of Chinese personality. In K. S. Kurasaki & S. Sue (Eds.), Asian American Mental Health: Assessment theories and methods (pp. 141–157). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leong, F. T. L. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66, 593–603. doi:10.1037/a0022389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Church, A. T. (2010). Measurement issues in cross-cultural research. In G. Walford, E. Tucker, & M. Viswanathan (Eds.), The Sage handbook of measurement (pp. 151–177). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologists, 55, 34–43. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 653–663. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2352-0_4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). National differences in subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 434–450). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (Eds.). (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larson, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, W., Ho, S. M. Y., Yu, B., Tang, X., Zhang, Y., Li, T., & Yuen, T. (2012). Factor structure of the Chinese Virtues Questionnaire. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 680–688. doi:10.1177/1049731512450074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gable, S. L., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9, 103–110. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. M. (1997). You can’t take it with you: Why ability assessments don’t cross cultures. American Psychologist, 52(10), 1115–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. M. Y. (2010). Universal happiness. In L. Bormans (Ed.), The world book of happiness (pp. 253–255). Singapore: Page One Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. M. Y., & Cheung, M. W. L. (2007). Using the combined etic-emic approach to develop a measurement of interpersonal subjective well-being in Chinese populations. In A. D. Ong & M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 139–152). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. M. Y., Chan, C. L. W., & Ho, R. T. H. (2004). Post-traumatic growth in Chinese cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 13, 377–389. doi:10.1002/pon.758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. M. Y., Law, L. S. C., Wang, G.-L., Shih, S.-M., Hsu, S.-H., & Hou, Y.-C. (2013). Psychometric analysis of the Chinese version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory with cancer patients in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Psycho-Oncology, 22(3), 715–719. doi:10.1002/pon.3024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16, 131–152. doi:10.1177/0022002185016002001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. P. (1998). Approaches to equivalence in cross-cultural and cross-national survey research. ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial, 3, 1–40. Retrieved from http://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/upload/forschung/publikationen/zeitschriften/zuma_nachrichten_spezial/znspezial3.pdf

  • Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwatz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • KankaraÅ¡, M., & Moors, G. (2010). Researching measurement equivalence in cross-cultural studies. Psihologija, 43, 121–135. doi:10.2298/PSI1002121K.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785–800. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J., & Gunatilaka, R. (2009). Great expectations? The subjective well-being of rural-urban migrants in China. World Development, 38, 113–124. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubokawa, A., & Amber, O. (2009). Positive psychology and cultural sensitivity: A review of the literature. Graduate Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1(2, Article 13). Retrieved from http://epublications.marquette.edu/gjcp/vol1/iss2/13

  • Lee, J. A., Luxton, D. D., Reger, G. M., & Gahm, G. A. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory with a sample of soldiers previously deployed in support of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 813–819. doi:10.1002/jclp.20692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, F. T. L., Leung, K., & Cheung, F. M. (2010). Integrating cross-cultural psychology research methods into ethnic minority psychology. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 590–597. doi:10.1037/a0020127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2007). Character strengths in the United Kingdom: The VIA inventory of strengths. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(2), 341–351. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonner, W. J., & Berry, J. W. (1986). Field methods in cross-cultural research. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L. (2001). Understanding happiness: A look into the Chinese folk psychology. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 407–432. doi:10.1023/A:1013944228205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137–155. doi:10.1023/A:1006824100041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maercker, A., & Langner, R. (2001). Posttraumatic personal growth: Validation of German versions of two questionnaires. Diagnostics, 47, 153–162. doi:10.1026//0012-1924.47.3.153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallinckrodt, B., & Wang, C. C. (2004). Quantitative methods for verifying semantic equivalence of translated research instruments: A Chinese version of the experiences in close relationships scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(3), 368–379. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.3.368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Character strengths in fifty-four nations and the fifty US states. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 118–129. doi:10.1080/17439760600619567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Stephens, J. P., Park, N., Lee, F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Strengths of character and work. In P. A. Linley, S. Harrington, & N. Garcea (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology and work. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, S., Rosner, R., Butollo, W., Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2003). Posttraumatic growth after war: A study with former refugees and displaced people in Sarajevo. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 71–83. doi:10.1002/jclp.10117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rochelle, T. L., & Marks, D. F. (2010). Medical pluralism of the Chinese in London: An exploratory study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 715–728. doi:10.1348/135910709X479195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rochelle, T. L., & Marks, D. F. (2011). Health behaviours and use of Chinese medicine among the British Chinese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 390–405. doi:10.1177/0022022110362745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochelle, T. L., Shardlow, S. M., & Ng, S. H. (2009). Ageing in Hong Kong and the UK: A comparison of the Chinese at home and abroad. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 8, 25–41. doi:10.1080/15339114.2009.9678472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shu, X., & Zhu, Y. (2009). The quality of life in China. Social Indicators Research, 92, 191–225. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9350-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. F., Hicks, B., Kashdan, T. B., Krueger, R. F., & Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (2007). Genetic and environmental influences on the positive traits of the values in action classification, and biometric covariance with normal personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 524–539. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 482–493. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suinn, R. M. (2010). Reviewing acculturation and Asian Americans: How acculturation affects health, adjustment, school achievement, and counseling. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 1(1), 5–17. doi:10.1037/a0018798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taku, K., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., Gil-Rivas, V., Kilmer, R. P., & Cann, A. (2007). Examining posttraumatic growth among Japanese university students. Anxiety, Stress and Coping: An International Journal, 20, 353–367. doi:10.1080/10615800701295007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taku, K., Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2008). The factor structure of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: A comparison of five models using confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 21, 158–164. doi:10.1002/jts.20305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1995). Trauma and transformation: Growing in the aftermath of suffering. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9, 455–471. doi:10.1002/jts.2490090305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T., & Berger, R. (2006). Reliability and validity of a Spanish version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 191–199. doi:10.1177/1049731505281374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8, 94–104. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2011). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Retrieved November 25, 2011, from http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel M. Y. Ho Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ho, S.M.Y., Rochelle, T.L., Law, L.S.C., Duan, W., Bai, Y., Shih, SM. (2014). Methodological Issues in Positive Psychology Research with Diverse Populations: Exploring Strengths Among Chinese Adults. In: Teramoto Pedrotti, J., Edwards, L. (eds) Perspectives on the Intersection of Multiculturalism and Positive Psychology. Cross-Cultural Advancements in Positive Psychology, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8654-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics