Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Population ((IHOP,volume 6))

Abstract

Migrant remittances and their impacts are among the most studied topics in the social sciences. They are also often mis-studied. The primary goal of this chapter is to provide an empirical framework to analyze migrant remittances and their economic impacts. Along the way, we critically review selected works in the remittances-and-development literature, though our intent is not to offer a comprehensive literature review. We start with an idealized thought experiment to elucidate identification challenges. Next, we review several empirical strategies that have been used in the literature to identify the impacts of migration and remittances. Our review focuses on the positive and negative aspects of each strategy, as well as implementation challenges. A survey of existing literature follows, organized by outcomes of interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For world remittances , see: Dalip Ratha, Worldwide Remittance Flows updated to $483 billion for 2011. http://blogs.worldbank.org/peoplemove/worldwide-remittance -flows-updated-to-483-billion-for-2011. Aid data are from OECD’s Development Co-operation Directorate, “Development aid reaches an historic high in 2010.” http://www.oecd.org/document/35/0,3746,en_2649_34447_ 47515235_1_1_1_1,00.html

  2. 2.

    These are households that do not have an immediate household member abroad in the United State s and so are receiving remittances from more distant family or friends.

References

  • Acosta, P. (2011). School attendance, child labour and remittances from international migration in El Salvador. Journal of Development Studies, 47(6), 913–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acosta, P., Calderon, C., Fajnzylber, P., & Humberto Lopez, J. (2008). What is the impact of remittances on poverty and inequality in Latin America? World Development, 36(1), 89–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. H., Jr. (1998). Remittances, investment, and rural asset accumulation in Pakistan. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47(1), 155–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. H., Jr., & Cuecuecha, A. (2010). Remittances, household expenditure and investment in Guatemala. World Development, 38(11), 1626–1641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. H., Jr., & Page, J. (2005). Do international migration and remittances reduce poverty in developing countries? World Development, 33(10), 1645–1669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amuedo-Dorantes, C., & Pozo, S. (2006). Migration, remittances and male and female employment patterns. American Economic Review, 96(2), 222–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amuedo-Dorantes, C., & Pozo, S. (2010). Accounting for remittance and migration effects on children’s schooling. World Development, 38(12), 1747–1759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amuedo-Dorantes, C., & Pozo, S. (2011). New evidence on the role of remittances on healthcare expenditures by Mexican households. Review of Economics of the Household, 9(1), 69–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, A., & Taylor, J. E. (2011). Transforming rural economies: Migration, income generation and inequality in rural Mexico. Journal of Development Studies, 48(8), 1156–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiquiar, D., & Hanson, G. (2005). International migration, self-selection, and the distribution of wages: Evidence from Mexico and the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 113(2), 239–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Brauw, A., & Rozelle, S. (2008). Migration and household investment in rural China. China Economic Review, 19(2), 320–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, G. H., & Woodruff, C. (2003). Emigration and educational attainment in Mexico (UCSD Working Paper). San Diego: UCSD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, N., McKenzie, D. J., Esquivel, G., & Schargrodsky, E. (2005). The effects of migration on child health in Mexico [with comments]. Economia, 6(1), 257–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Cordova, E. (2005). Globalization, migration, and development: The role of Mexican migrant remittances. Economia, 6(1), 217–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Feldman, A., & Taylor, J. E. (2010). Does migration make rural households more productive? Evidence from Mexico. Journal of Development Studies, 46(1), 68–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckenzie, D., & Yang, D. (2010). Experimental approaches in migration studies (The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series 5395). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel, E., & Kremer, M. (2004). Worms: Identifying impacts on education and health in the presence of treatment externalities. Econometrica, 72(1), 159–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozelle, S., Taylor, J. E., & de Brauw, A. (1999). Migration, remittances and agricultural productivity in China. American Economic Review, 89(2), 287–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O., Edward Taylor, J., & Yitzhaki, S. (1986). Remittances and inequality. The Economic Journal, 96, 722–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. E. (1992). Remittances and inequality reconsidered: Direct, indirect and intertemporal effects. Journal of Policy Modeling, 14(2), 187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. E., & Dyer, G. A. (2009). Migration and the sending economy: A disaggregated rural economy-wide analysis. Journal of Development Studies, 45(6), 966–989.Taylor, J. E. and Filipski, M. (2014). Beyond Experiments in Development Economics: Local Economy-wide Impact Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. E., & Filipski, M. (2014). Beyond experiments in development economics: Local economy-wide impact evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. E., & Mora, J. (2006). Does migration reshape expenditures in rural households? Evidence from Mexico (The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 3842). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. E., & Wyatt, T. J. (1996). The shadow value of migrant remittances, income and inequality in a household-farm economy. Journal of Development Studies, 32(6), 899–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. E., Rozelle, S., & de Brauw, A. (2003). Migration and incomes in source communities: A new economics of migration perspective from China. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52(1), 75–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmins, C., & Schlenker, W. (2009). Reduced-form versus structural modeling in environmental and resource economics. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1, 351–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, C., & Zenteno, R. (2007). Migration networks and microenterprises in Mexcio. Journal of Development Economics, 82(2), 509–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. (2008). International migration, remittances and household investment: Evidence from Philippine Migrants’ exchange rate shocks. The Economic Journal, 118(528), 591–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D., & Martinez, C. (2006). Remittances and poverty in migrants home areas: Evidence from the Philippines. In Ç. Ozden & M. Schiff (Eds.), International migration. Remittances and the brain drain (pp. 81–122). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunez-Naude, A., & Edward Taylor, J. (2001). The determinants of nonfarm activities and incomes of rural households in Mexico, with emphasis on education. World Development, 29, 561–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Edward Taylor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, J.E., Castelhano, M. (2016). Economic Impacts of Migrant Remittances. In: White, M. (eds) International Handbook of Migration and Population Distribution. International Handbooks of Population, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7282-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7282-2_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7281-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7282-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics