Skip to main content

Corporate-personal tax integration

  • Chapter
Tax Coordination in the European Community

Abstract

Article 67 of the Treaty of Rome sets out as an ultimate goal of the European Community (EC) the achievement of a free flow of capital within the Community.1 While the Treaty of Rome does not explicitly provide for the harmonization of direct taxes (as it does for indirect taxes in Article 99), it does provide for the ‘approximation’ of legislation which affects the establishment or functioning of the Common Market (Article 100) or which creates distortions in the conditions of competition (Article 101).2 The harmonization of direct taxes is thus in principle not a goal in itself but simply one measure among many that may be needed to attain the desired degree of economic integration. Nevertheless, almost from the beginning of the EC, considerable importance has been attached to the task of bringing the corporate tax systems in the different countries into basic alignment, not least with respect to their relation to the personal income tax. The EC has not, however, found it easy to decide exactly what form of corporate-personal tax integration is best.

I am grateful to Sijbren Cnossen, Peggy Musgrave, David Rosenbloom, and other participants at the ISPE conference for helpful comments which have resulted in substantial changes — and, I trust, improvements — in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Alworth, Julian. ‘A Cost of Capital Approach to the Taxation of Foreign Direct Investment Income.’ June 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alworth, Julian. ‘Taxation and the Cost of Capital: A Comparison of Six EC Countries.’ Chapter 9, this volume, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andel, Norbert. ‘Directions of Tax Harmonization in the EEC’ In Cnossen, Sijbren (ed.). Comparative Tax Studies. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, Alan.’ share Valuation and Corporate Equity Policy.’ Journal of Public Economics, 11, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, Alan. ‘Integration with Corporate Tax.’ In Mintz, Jack. Report of the Policy Forum on Tax Reform and the Consumption Tax. Kingston: John Deutsch Institute for the Study of Economic Policy, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieri, S. Fiscal Federalism in Switzerland. Canberra: Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations, Australian National University, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, Richard M. Taxing Corporations. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, Richard M. ‘Tax Harmonization and Federal Finance: A Perspective on Recent Canadian Discussion.’ Canadian Public Policy, 10, 3, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, Richard M. Federal Finance in Comparative Perspective. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, Richard M. and Brean, D.J.S. ‘Canada-US Tax Relations: Issues and Perspectives.’ In Fretz, Deborah, Stern, Robert and Whalley, John (eds). Canada/United States Trade and Investment Issues. Toronto: Ontario Economic Council, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, Robin and Bruce, Neil. ‘The Personal Income Tax: Implications for Investments.’ In Conklin, D.W. (ed.). A Separate Personal Income Tax for Ontario: Background Studies. Toronto: Ontario Economic Council, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R. and Wildasin, D.E. Public Sector Economics, 2nd edn. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, Robin, Bruce, Neil and Mintz, Jack. ‘Corporate Taxation in Canada: Toward an Efficient System.’ In Thirsk, W. and Whalley, J. (eds). Tax Policy Options in the 1980s. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossons, John. ‘Inflation, Indexation, and the Capital Gains Tax.’ Institute for Policy Analysis, University of Toronto, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucovetsky, Meyer and Bird, Richard M. ‘Tax Reform in Canada: A Progress Report.’ National Tax Journal, 25, March 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, William J. and Sato, Mitsuo. ‘The Domestic Consequences of Alternative Systems of Corporate Taxation.’ Public Finance Quarterly, 4, July 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Tax Foundation. The National Finances 1984–85. Toronto, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cnossen, Sijbren. ‘The Imputation System in the EEC.’ In Cnossen, Sijbren (ed.). Comparative Tax Studies: Essays in Honor of Richard Goode. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cnossen, Sijbren. ‘Alternative Forms of Corporate Tax.’ Australian Tax Forum, 1, September 1984. Reprinted as ‘Corporation Taxes in OECD Member Countries.’ Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation, 38, 11, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. ‘Proposal for a Directive of the Council concerning the Harmonization of Company Taxation and of Withholding Taxes on Dividends.’ European Taxation, Nos. 2-4, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. ‘Report on the Scope for Convergence of Tax Systems in the Community.’ Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 1, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, Harry G. ‘Corporate Tax Integration: The European Experience.’ The Tax Lawyer, 3, Fall 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenewegen, Peter. ‘Apportioning Taxation Powers in a Federation.’ In Mathews, R.L. (ed.). State Taxation in Theory and Practice. Canberra: Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations, Australian National University, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartle, Douglas G. et al. A Separate Personal Income Tax for Ontario: An Economic Analysis. Toronto: Ontario Economic Council, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, J.G. and Bird, R.M. ‘Tax Policy Options in the 1980s.’ In Cnossen, Sijbren (ed.). Comparative Tax Studies. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Fiscal Studies. The Structure and Reform of Direct Taxation. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J.A. and King, M.A. The British Tax System. Oxford University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, Hon. Paul. Reform of the Australian Taxation System. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Mervyn A. Public Policy and the Corporation. London: Chapman Hall, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Mel. Fiscal Harmonization in the Benelux Economic Union. Amsterdam: International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLure, Charles E. Jr. Must Corporate Income Be Taxed Twice?. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLure, Charles E. Jr. ‘International Aspects of Dividend Relief.’ Journal of Corporate Taxation, 7, Summer, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLure, Charles E. Jr. ‘Assignment of Corporate Income Taxes in a Federal System.’ In McLure, Charles E. Jr (ed.). Tax Assignment in Federal Countries. Canberra: ANU Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mieszkowski, Peter. ‘Integration of the Corporate and Personal Income Taxes: The Bogus Issue of Shifting.’ Finanzarchiv, 31, 2, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migue, Jean-Luc. ‘Trade Barriers, Regulation and Bureaucratic Supply as Alternative Instruments of Wealth Transfers.’ In Quinn, John, and Slayton, Philip (ed.). Non-Tariff Barriers after the Tokyo Round. Montreal: The Institute for Research on Public Policy, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, Peggy B. ‘Interjurisdictional Coordination of Taxes on Capital Income.’ Chapter 7, this volume, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumark Report. Tax Harmonization in the Common Market. New York: Commerce Clearing House, Inc., 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norr, Martin. The Taxation of Corporations and Shareholders. Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Revenue Statistics of OECD Member Countries. Paris, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, R.J. ‘The Proposed Canada-United States Income Tax Treaty: Nondiscrimination, Mutual Agreement, and Exchange of Information.’ Report of Proceedings of the 32nd Tax Conference. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reform of the Australian Tax System. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Taxation. Report. Ottawa, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, Mitsuo, and Bird, Richard M. ‘International Aspects of the Taxation of Corporations and Shareholders.’ IMF Staff Papers, 22, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, R.A. ‘Comment.’ In Report of Proceedings of the 32nd Tax Conference. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoup, Carl S. Public Finance. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoup, Carl S. ‘Effects of U.S. Tax Laws on Tax Systems of Developing Countries.’ In Hellawell, Robert (ed.). United States Taxation and Developing Countries. New York: Columbia University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph. ‘Taxation, Corporate Financial Policy, and the Cost of Capital.’ Journal of Public Economics, 2, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, Peter L. ‘An Australian View on Tax Integration.’ In Head, J.G. (ed.). Taxation Issues of the 1980s. Sydney: Australian Taxation Research Foundation, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • The President’s Tax Proposals to the Congress for Fairness, Growth and Simplicity. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirsk, Wayne R. ‘Tax Harmonization and its Importance in the Canadian Federation.’ In Bird, R.M. (ed.). Fiscal Dimensions of Canadian Federalism. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindemans, Leo. ‘European Union.’ Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 1/76, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tresch, R.W. Public Finance. Piano, Texas: Business Publications, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of the Treasury. Blueprints for Basic Tax Reform. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of the Treasury. Tax Reform for Fairness, Simplicity, and Economic Growth, 3 vols. Washington DC: 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Tempel, A.J. Corporation Tax and Individual Income Tax in the European Communities. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bird, R.M. (1987). Corporate-personal tax integration. In: Cnossen, S. (eds) Tax Coordination in the European Community. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3206-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3206-2_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-3208-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3206-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics