Abstract
Theorem proving in the modal logic S4 is notoriously difficult, because in conventional sequent style calculi for this logic lengths of deductions are not bounded in terms of the length of their endsequent. This means that the usual depth first search strategy for backwards construction of deductions of given sequents may give rise to infinite search paths and is not guaranteed to terminate. Thus using such a search strategy prevents us not only from obtaining a decision procedure for the logic in question, but even from arriving at a complete proof procedure. There are two well known approaches for overcoming this problem: both approaches rely on the fact that all formulas which occur in a deduction are subformulas of the end-sequent and that out of these formulas one may only form finitely many “essentially different” sequents. Thus although there is no bound on the length of all deductions of a given sequent, we know that for any given sequent there is a number such that if the sequent is deducible at all, then it has a deduction of length smaller than this number. Hence by only considering deductions of appropriately bounded length one may obtain a decision procedure. But due to the fact that using such a procedure one is forced to construct many redundant inferences—one will, for instance, have to consecutively apply the same inference many times—this approach is considered rather inefficient.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R. Dyckhoff. Contraction free sequent calculi for intuitionistic logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 57, 795–807, 1992.
M. Fitting. Proof Methods for Modal and Intuitionistic Logics. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983.
J. Hudelmaier. Bounds for cut elimination in intuitionistic propositional logic. Archive for Mathematical Logic, 31, 331–353, 1992.
G. Mints. Gentzen-type systems and resolution rules. Part I. In: P. Martin-Löf, G. Mints (eds.), COLOG-88, Lecture Notes in Computer Sci. 417, pp. 198–231, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hudelmaier, J. (1996). A Contraction-Free Sequent Calculus for S4. In: Wansing, H. (eds) Proof Theory of Modal Logic. Applied Logic Series, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2798-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2798-3_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4720-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2798-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive