Skip to main content

Constructivism and Activity Theory: A Consideration of Their Similarities and Differences as They Relate to Mathematics Education

  • Chapter
Mathematics for Tomorrow’s Young Children

Part of the book series: Mathematics Education Library ((MELI,volume 16))

Abstract

The primary purpose of this chapter is to clarify the basic tenets of activity theory and constructivism, and to compare and contras instructional approaches developed within these global theoretical perspectives. This issue is worthy of discussion in that research and development programs derived from these two perspectives are both vigorous. For example, the work of sociocultural theorists conducted within the activity theory tradition has become increasingly influential in the United States in recent years. One paradigmatic group of studies conducted by Lave (1988), Newman, Griffin, and Cole (1089). and Scribner (1984) has related arithmetical computation to more encompassing social activities such as shopping in a supermarket, packing crates in a dairy, and completing worksheets in school. Taken together, these analyses demonstrate powerfully the need to consider broader social and cultural processes when accounting for children’s development of mathematic cal competeuce.

The research reported in this chapter was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant No. MDR 885-0560 and by the Spencer Foundation. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of these foundations.

Several notion central to this chapter were elaborate in the course of discussion with Heinrich Bauersfeld, Gotz Krummheuer, and Jorg Voigt at the University of Bielefeld, Germany, and with Koeno Gravemeijer at the Freudenthal Institute, State University of Utrecht, Netherlands. The authors are also grateful to Bert van Oers, King Beach and Jack Smith for numerous helpful comments on a previous draft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Axel, E. (1992). One developmental line in European Activity Theories. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition 14 (1), 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhurst, D. (1988). Activity, consciousness, and communication. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratoryof[omporammamxmnCvxmiox. 0, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauersfeld, H, (1980), Hidden dimensions in the so-called reality of a mathematics classroom. Educa tional Studies in Mathematics, 11, 23–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauersfeld, H. (1988). Interaction, construction, and knowledge: Alternative pers h v, for math cmaticvedocuóvn.,urcwmeyandn. Grouws (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching (pp. 29–46 ). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauersfeld, H. (1990). Activity theory and radical constructivism—What do they have in common and how do they differ? Biekefeld, Germany: University of Bielefeld, Institue für Didaktik der Math matiu. Occasional Paper 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauersfeld H. (1993). “Language Games” the mathematics classroom—Their function and their effects. Unpublished manuscript, University of Bielefeld, Germany, Institut für, Didaktik der Mathematik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyo d objectivism and relativism: Science hermeneutics and praxis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. (1985). The social construction of meaning—a significant development for mathematics education? For the Learning of Mathematics, 5 (1), 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspectives and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (1985). The crucial role of the didactical contract in the analysis and constructio of situations in tea hing and learning mathematics. In H. G. Steiner (Ed.) Theory education (pp. 110–119). Occasional paper 54. Bielefeld, Germany: Institut für Didaktik der Mathematik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1962). The proces of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, G. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. (1989). Experiential, cognitive and anthropological perspectives in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2 (2), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Wood, T., and Yackel E., (1990). Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maherandm, Eds, Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 4 (pp. 125–146 ). Reston, VA: National Council ofTeachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Wood, T., and Yackel, E, (in press). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In N. Minick, E. Forman, and A, Stone (Eds.), Education and mind: Institutional, social and developmentalmental processes. Oxford: New York University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel. E., and McNeal, G. (1992). Characteristics v, classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educationa Research Journal, 29, 573–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Yackel, E., and Wood, T. (1992) A constructicist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journalfor Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 2–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confrey, J. (1991). Steering a course between Vygotsky and Piaget. Educational Researcher, 20 (8), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. J., and Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davydov, V.V., (1982). The psychological characteristics of the formation of elementaiy mathematical operations in children. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser, and T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 224–238 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davydov, V. V. (1988a). Problems of developmental teaching (Part I). Soviet Education, 30 (8), 6–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davydov, V. V. (1988b). Problems of developmental teaching (Part 11). Soviet Education 30 (9), 3–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davydov, V. V. (1993), A of L. S. Notsky on educational theory research and practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davydov, V. V., and Markova, A. (1983). A concept of educational activity for school children. Soviet Psychology, 11 (2), 50–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davydov, V. V., and Radzikhvokü, L. A., (1985). Vygotsky’s theory and the activity-oriented approach in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 35–65 ). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, D. R. (1993). The wider social context of innovation in mathematics education. In T. Wood, P. Cobb, E. Yackel, and D. Dillon (Eds.), Rethinking elementary mathematics: Insights and issues (pp. 71–96). Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monogra h No. 6. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekeland, I. (1988). Mathemematics and the unexpected. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1925). Dialektik der Natur. Berlin, Germany: Dietz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H. (1981). Major problems of mathematics education. Educational Studie in Mathematics, 12, 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gidden, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. (1990). Context problems and realistic mathema cs instruction. In K. Gravemeijer, M. van den Heuvel, and L. Streefland (Eds.), Contexts. free productions tests and geometry in realistic education (pp. 10–32). Utrecht, Netherlands: OW and OC Research Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. (1992). Educational development and de in mathematics education. Unpublished paper, State University of Utrecht, Freudenthal Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. (1993). Edu tional de a research programme. Unpublished manuscript, Freudenthal Institute, State University of Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977). The concept of the ideal. In Philosophy in the USSR. Problems of dialectal materialism. Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozulin, A. (1986). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology: Vygotsky, his disciples and critics. American Psychologist, 41, 264–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M.L. (1985). How dv teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on the problems of practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55, 178–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988) Practice: Mind mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lektorsky, V.A. (1984). Subject object cognition. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A.N. (1978). Problemy razvitiya psikhiki [Problems in the development of the mind] (2nd ed.) Moscow:“Mysl.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A.N. (1978). Activity. consciousness. and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem ofactivity in psychology. In: J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Sovierpsychology. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamardashvili, M. K. (1968). Formai soderzhanie myshleniya [Form and content ofthought]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K(1890/1981). Das Kapital. Berlin, Germany: Dietz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1989). Mathematical abstraction as the result ofa delicate shift ofattention. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2 (2), 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H., and Wood, H. (1975). The reality ethnomethodology. New York, NY: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minick, N. (1987). The development of Vygotsky’s thought; Au introduction. In: R.W. Reiber and A.S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of Vygotsky L.S. vol. 1; Problems of general psychology (pp. 17–38 ). New York, NY: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Minick, N. (1989a). L. S. Vygorsky and Soviet activity theory: Perspectives on the relationsh between mind and society. Literacies Institute, Special Monograph Series No, 1. Newton, MA: Educational Development Center, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minick, N. (1989b). Mind and activity in Vygotsky’s work: An expanded frame of reference. Cultural Dynamics, 2, 162–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school, narhemalics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Tea hers of Mathematics (1991). Professional standardsfor teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D., Griffin, P., and Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1980). Adaptation and intelligence: Organic selection and phenocopy. Chicago, EL: Universitysity of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1987). The many faces of realism. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. T., Lampert, M., and Peterso, P.L. (1990). Alternative perspectives on knowing mathematics. In: B. Cazden (Ed,), Review of research in education (vo.16, pp. 57–149 ). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razmyslov, P. (1934). O “Kul’turno-istoricheskoj teorii psikhologii” Vygotskogo i Lurijia. Kniga i Proletarskaja Recoljucija, 4, 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. (1991). Mathematical discussions. In: E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 13–52 ). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R (1978). Phi and the mirror Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, G.B., (1991a). Culture and cognitive development: Studie in mathematical understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, G. B. (1991b). From the field to the classroom: Studies in mathematical understanding, Paper nted at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Research Presession, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S. (1984). Studying working intellige In: J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: It development in social context (pp. 9–40 ). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S. (1990). Reflections on a model. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 12, 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M. (1993). Context for change: Themes related to mathematics education reform. In T. Wood, R Cobb, E. Yackel, and D. Dillon (Eds.), Rethinking eleme tary school mathematics: Insights and issues (pp. 109–114). Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograh No. 6. Reston, VA: Na tional Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematical Teaching, 77, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon,Y. (1989) The practice of mathematics. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbring, H. (1989). Routine and meaning in the mathematics classroom. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2 (1), 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streefland, L. (1991). Fraction in realistic mathematics education. A paradigm of developmental re search. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions: A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction-The Wiskobas Project. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treffers, A. (1991). Meeting innumeracy at primary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tymoczko, T. (Ed.) (1986). New directions in the philosophy of mathematics. Boston, MA: Birkhauser.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Veer, R., and Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (1990). The development of mathematical thinking in school: A comparison of the action-psychological and the information-processing approach. International Journal of Educational Research, 14, 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (in press). Learning mathematics as meaningful activity. In P. Nesher, L. State, P. Cobb, G. Goldin, and B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, J. (1985). Patterns and routines in classroom interaction. Recherches en Didactique des Mathematiques, 6, 69–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, J. (1992, August). Negotiation of mathematical meaning in classroom processes. Paper presented at the International Congress on Mathematics Education, Québec City, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In: P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 17–40 ). New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1989a). Constructivism. In T. Husen and T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education (1st ed., supplement vol. 1, pp. 162–163 ). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1989b). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthèse, 80, 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1990). Environment and communication. In L. R Steffe and T. Wood (Eds.), Transforming children’s mathematics education: International perspectives (pp. 30–38 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1992). Constructivism reconstructed: A reply to Suchting. Science and Education, 1, 379–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1960). Razvitie vysshikh psikhicheskikh funktsii [The development of the higher mental functions]. Moscow: Akad, Ped. Nauk. RSFSR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1979). Consciousness as a problem in the psychology of behavior. Soviet Psychology, 17 (4), 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1984). Problema vozrasta [The problem of age]. In D. B. EPkonin (Ed.), L. S. Vygotskii. Sobranie sochinenie: Detskaia psikhologiia (Tom 4) [L. S. Vygotsky, Collected works: Child psychology (Vol. 4)] (pp. 244–268 ). Moscow: Pedagogika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. (1991). Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education. In J. Harel and S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 193–204 ). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yackel, E., and Cobb, R (1993). Sociomath norms argumentation and autonomy in mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinchenko, R (1983). The problem of involuntary memory. Soviet Psychology, 22 (2), 34–86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cobb, P., Perlwitz, M., Underwood, D. (1996). Constructivism and Activity Theory: A Consideration of Their Similarities and Differences as They Relate to Mathematics Education. In: Mansfield, H., Pateman, N.A., Bednarz, N. (eds) Mathematics for Tomorrow’s Young Children. Mathematics Education Library, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2211-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2211-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4690-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2211-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics