Abstract
The paper is based on the long experience in applying various spatial data analysis methods and approaches to the radioactive pollution data after the Chernobyl accident. Application of three basic approaches are described in the work: geostatistics (both parametric and non-parametric models), artificial neural networks (ANN) and monitoring network analysis, including fractals and cluster analysis. There have been developed hybrid geostatistical-ANN models, which show better performance then one approach models in many complex non-stationary cases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Buzulukov Yu., Dobrynin Yu. (1993) Releases of radionuclides during the Chemobyl accident, in S.E. Merwin, and M.I. Balonov (eds.),The Chernobyl Papers, Research Enterprises,Richland, 3–21.
De Cort M., and Tsaturov Yu.S. (editors) (1996) Atlas on caesium contamination of Europe after the Chernobyl nuclear plant accident,European Commission, Luxembourg, EUR 16542 EN.
Deutsch C. V., and Joumel A.G. (1992) GSLIB Geostatistical Software Library and User’ s Guide. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, 340 p.
Haas T. C. (1996) Multivariate Spatial Prediction in the Presence of Nonlinear Trend and Covariance Nonstationarity. Environmetrics 7(1), 145–166.
Israel Yu. A., Vakulovslii S. M., Vetrov V. A., Petrov V. N., Rovinskii F. Ya., Stukin E. D. (1990). Chernobyl: Radioactive Contamination of the Environment. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, (in Russian.).
Kanevsky M. (1995) Use of artificial neural networks for the spatial interpolations of radioecological data, Izves- tija Akademii Nauk. Energetika 3, 26–33, (in Russian).
Kanevsky M., Arutyunyan R., Bolshov L., Demyanov V., Savelieva E., and Haas T. (1995) Environmental Spatial Data Analysis. Case Study: Chernobyl Fallout. Tenth International Conference on Mathematical and Computer Modelling and Scientific Computing. Boston, USA. Books of Abstracts, p. 179.
Kanevsky M., Arutyunyan R., Bolshov L. Demyanov V., Maignan M.. (1996) Artificial neural networks and spatial estimations of Chemobyl falloutGeoinformatics 7, nos. 1–2, 5–12.
Kanevsky M., and Savelieva E. (1995) Environmental monitoring networks and quantitative description of clustering. IAMG’95 Annual Conference. Abstracts for Technical Programs, 31–32.
Karaoglou A., Desmet G., Kelly G.N., Menzel H.G. (eds.) (1996) The radiological consequences of the Chernobyl accident. EUR NI6544 EN. 1192 p.
Kovin G. (1992). Fractal Models in the Earth Sciences. Elsevier Science PublishersB.V. Amsterdam.
Korvin G., Boyd D.M., O’Dowd R., (1990). Fractal characterisation of the South Australian gravity station network. GeophysJJnt. 100, 535–539.
Lovejoy S., Schertzer D, Ladoy P. (1986) Fractal characterisation of inhomogeneous geophysical measuring networks. Nature 319, 43–44.
Ouchi T., Uekawa T., (1986) Statistical analysis of the spatial distribution of earthquakes–variation of the spatial distribution of earthquakes before and after large earthquakes. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 44, 211–225.
Raes F., De Cort M., Graziani G., (1991) Multi-fractal nature of radioactivity deposition on soil after the Chemobyl accident. Health Physics 61, 271–274.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kanevky, M. et al. (1997). Chernobyl Fallout: Review of Advanced Spatial Data Analysis. In: Soares, A., Gómez-Hernandez, J., Froidevaux, R. (eds) geoENV I — Geostatistics for Environmental Applications. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1675-8_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1675-8_32
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4861-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1675-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive