Summary
A released body falling to the earth travels a distance proportional to the second rather than first power of its terminal velocity. This fact, belatedly recognized by Galileo, denied by Descartes, established by Huygens and Newton, culminated in the law of conservation of (mechanical) energy. Mathematically, this law is based upon a property of the calculus of variations according to which the optimizing solution to
has, because the integrand does not involve time explicitly, an “energy” integral of the form
.1
I owe thanks to the National Science Foundation. In Chapter 2, I prove similar relations without considering the minimum-time formulations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See any treatise on classical mechanics, such as E. T. Whittaker, (1937), Analytical Dynamics, Chapter Ill, p. 62.
The differentiable, neoclassical version of the famous von Neumann system is discussed in R. Dorfman, P. Samuelson, and R. Solow (1958), Linear Programming and Economic Analysis,New York: McGraw-Hill, Chapters 11 and 12.
See P. A. Samuelson, “Efficient Paths of Capital Accumulation in Terms of the Calculus of Variations,” pp. 77–88 in K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin, and P. Suppes, eds. (1960), Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, 1959,Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. This is reproduced as Chapter 26 in Samuelson’s (1965) Collected Scientific Papers, Vol. I,J. E. Stiglitz, ed., Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
This efficiency condition is derived in P. A. Samuelson, op. cit., p. 79 in slightly different notation. As arbitrage conditions for own-interest rates in a perfect capital market, they were derived in P. A. Samuelson (1937), “Some Aspects of the Pure Theory of Capital,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, LI, pp. 469496, particularly on p. 490 of pp. 485–491. (This is reproduced as Chapter 17 in Collected Scientific Papers, Vol. I, op. cit.)
If we had but one capital good, F would take the simple form 0 = rK-K; with r a constant, the problem would become trivial, since rK would grow at the same exponential rate as K. (The reader is warned that Irving Fisher would not call Y = ~,F. K. = S(—F + .) K. “income,” reserving that word for “consumption,” which is zero in the present closed system. But this is the usual Marshall-Haig definition of income. If, with Mrs. Robinson we call a“Wicksell effect,” it follows that such effects must behave in the described way along any optimal path.
Seep. 85 of the 1960 Samuelson paper cited in Footnote 3.
This case is utilized in C. Caton and K. Shell (1971), “An Exercise in the Theory of Heterogeneous Capital,” Review of Economic Studies, 38, pp. 13–22. It was suggested earlier by P. A. Samuelson (1966), “The Fundamental Singularity Theorem for Non-Joint Production,” International Economic Review, VII, pp. 34–41, as have E. Burmeister and various collaborators.
Another way of formulating the present finding is to say that “the present-discounted value of any future-time investment or income is a strict constant, just as the present-discounted value of any future-time capital stock is a (different) constant. As James Mirrlees states in private correspondence, it is the truth of the first of these that is at first surprising. Edwin Burmeister has also pointed out to me that the constancy of a Pontryagin Hamiltonian is another way of expressing and proving the present result, which is reasonable in view of the classical fact from mechanics that Hamilton’s canonical H (p, q) is given the interpretation of total energy.
For such a Robinson case, see M. Bruno (1967), “Optimal Accumulation in Discrete Capital Models,” in K. Shell, ed., Essays on the Theory of Optimal Economic Growth, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, Essay II, pp. 181218. ( However, the closed von Neumann case is not dealt with by Dr. Bruno. )
See Dorman, Samuelson, and Solow, op. cit., pp. 312–313.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Samuelson, P.A. (1990). Two Conservation Laws in Theoretical Economics. In: Sato, R., Ramachandran, R.V. (eds) Conservation Laws and Symmetry: Applications to Economics and Finance. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1145-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1145-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5786-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1145-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive