Skip to main content

Co-Learning in the Collaborative Mathematics Classroom

  • Chapter
Collaboration in Teacher Education

Part of the book series: Mathematics Teacher Education ((MTEN,volume 1))

Abstract

Co-learning agreements between researchers and practitioners have been suggested as a way of generating research findings that are useful to improving schools and informing classroom practice. In this chapter we describe how a co-learning agreement was developed as a basis for researching aspects of the learning of mathematics in the classroom of a teacher whose pedagogy emphasised collaborative problem-solving as a major vehicle for learning mathematics. A study of co-operative group work in mathematics found that the perceptions of high achieving students (in terms of the purpose and benefits of group work) were more in line with those of their teacher than those of low achieving students. In contrast, the research reported in this chapter of a collaborative mathematics classroom revealed no such differences between students. In using a co-learning approach both authors felt that they learnt more about the processes of collaborating in researching and learning mathematics than they would have done with either a more traditional ‘data gathering’ approach led by the researcher or as a piece of action research by the teacher. The chapter suggests that co-learning can be a useful way of collaborating and describes the benefits such an approach can offer when researching classroom processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, R., Rose, J. Woodhead, C. (1992), Curriculum organisation and classroom practice in primary schools: A discussion paper. London: DES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. Todd, F. (1977). Communication and learning in small groups. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M. (1998). Analysing power relationships in collaborative groups in mathematics. In P. Gates (Ed.), Mathematics education and society (pp. 82–91 ). Nottingham: University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. (1995). Women’s ways of knowing in mathematics. In P. Rogers G. Kaiser (Eds.), Equity in mathematics education: Influences offeminism and culture (pp. 163–174 ). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64 (1), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E., Lotan, R. Holthuis, N. (1995). Talking and working together: Conditions for learning in complex instruction. In M. Hallinan (Ed.), Restructuring schools: Promising practices and policies (pp. 171–181 ). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W. Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 13 (1), 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Gaitan, C. (1993). Researching change and changing the researcher. Harvard Educational Review, 63 (4), 389–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.) (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer, E. (1995). Using semi-structured interviews in small scale research. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. (1997). Feminist pedagogy, socio-mathematical norms and the mathematics national curriculum. Unpublished MA(Ed) dissertation. University of Southampton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. (1999). Collaboration through mathematics learning or collaboration in mathematics learning: Implicit or direct teaching? Unpublished MPhil (Research Methods) dissertation. University of Southampton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. Jones, K. (1999a). The struggle for a socially just pedagogy: An ethnographic study of a mathematics classroom. Centre for Research in Mathematics Education Working Paper. Southampton: University of Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. Jones, K. (1999b). Students’ views of learning mathematics in collaborative small groups. In O. Zaslaysky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 281–288 ). Haifa: Israel Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, E. A. Cazden, C. B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction (pp. 323–347 ). In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, R. M. Ashman, A. F. (1996). Teaching collaborative skills to primary school children in classroom-based work groups. Learning and Instruction, 6 (3), 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, T. L., Mulryan, C. McCaslin, M. (1992). Grouping for instruction in mathematics: A call for programmatic research on small-group processes (pp. 165–196 ). In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects. 1996 Teacher Training Agency Annual Lecture, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillage, J. (1998). Excellence in research on schools. London: DIEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. (2000). Co-learning agreements in mathematics teaching and teacher education. Discussion organised at a meeting of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics. University of Loughborough, May 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R. T., Nelson, D., Skon, L. (1981). Effect of co-operative, competitive and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89 (1), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. (1997). Theorizing collaboration: Some theoretical and methodological issues. In M. Johnston (Ed.), Contradictions in collaboration: New thinking on school/university partnerships (pp. 110–121 ). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapuscinski, P. (1997). The collaborative lens: A new look at an old research study. In H. Christiansen, L. Goulet, C. Krentz M. Maeers (Eds.), Recreating relationships: Collaboration and educational reform (pp. 3–12 ). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laborde, C. (1994). Working in small groups: A learning situation? In R. Biehler, R. Scholz, R. Strißer B. Winkelmann (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 147–158 ). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1995). Feminist perspectives on empowering research methodologies. In J. Holland, M. Blair S. Sheldon (Eds.), Debates and issues in feminist research and pedagogy (pp. 292–305 ). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, S. (1996). An analysis of collaborative group work in the primary school and the factors relevant to its success. Language and Education, 10 (1), 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulryan, C. M. (1994). Perceptions of intermediate students’ cooperative small-group work in mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 87 (5), 280–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NERPPB (1999a). Investing in learning: A policy statement with recommendations on research in education. Washington, DC: National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • NERPPB (1999b). National directions in education research planning. Washington, DC: National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Standards in Education (1998a). Standards in the primary curriculum. London: Ofsted. Office for Standards in Education (1998b). Setting in primary schools. London: Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Standards in Education (1999). Primary education: A review of primary schools in England 1994–98. London: Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povey, H. (1996). Constructing a liberatory discourse in mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Review, 8 (1), 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehler, L. R. Cantlon, D. J. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in the social constructivist classroom. In K. Hogan M. Pressley (Eds), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 6–42 ). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solar, C. (1995). An inclusive pedagogy in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28 (3), 311–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooley, J. (1998). Educational research: A critique. London: Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26 (7), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whicker, K. M., Boll, L. Nunnery, J. A. (1997). Cooperative learning in the secondary mathematics class. Journal of Educational Research, 91 (1), 42–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring and problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17 (2), 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. O’Malley, C. (1996). Collaborative learning between peers: An overview. Educational Psychology in Practice, 11 (4), 4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, R. Hartup, W. W. (1997). Friends as co-workers: Research review and classroom implications. Elementary School Journal, 98 (1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Edwards, JA., Jones, K. (2003). Co-Learning in the Collaborative Mathematics Classroom. In: Peter-Koop, A., Santos-Wagner, V., Breen, C., Begg, A. (eds) Collaboration in Teacher Education. Mathematics Teacher Education, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1072-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1072-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6327-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1072-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics