Skip to main content

Representational Flexibility for Design

  • Chapter
Artificial Intelligence in Design ’02

Abstract

We present an abstraction of representational schema to model sorts that allows us to explore the mathematical properties of a constructive approach to sorts We apply this approach to representational schema defined as compositions of primitive data types, and explore a comparison of representational structures with respect to scope and coverage. We consider a behavioral specification for sorts in order to empower these representational structures to support design activities effectively. We provide an example of the use of sorts to represent alternative views to a design problem. We conclude with a comparison with other approaches for flexibility of design representations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bazjanac, V: 1998, Industry foundation classes: bringing software interoperability to the building industry, The Construction Specifier 6: 47 - 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coomans, MKD: 2001, DDDiver: 3D interactive visualization of entity relationships, in D. Ebert (ed.), Data Visualization 2001: Proceedings of the Joint Eurographics and IEEE TCVG Symposium on Visualization,Springer, Vienna, pp. 291-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurti, R and Stouffs, R: 1997, Spatial change: continuity, reversibility and emergent shapes, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 24: 359 - 384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lottaz, C, Stouffs, R and Smith, I: 2000, Increasing understanding during collaboration through advanced representations, Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction 5: 1-25. [itcon.org/2000/1/]

    Google Scholar 

  • Requicha, A.A.G.: 1980, Representations for rigid solids: theory, methods and systems, Computing Surveys 12: 437 - 464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J.D.: 1998, Conceptual Modeling and Application Integration in CAD: The Essential Elements, Ph.D. dissertation, School of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J and Flemming, U: 1999, Information sharing in building design, in G. Augenbroe and C. Eastman (eds), Computers in Building, Kluwer Academic, Boston, pp. 165 - 183.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stiny, G: 1992, Weights, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 19: 413 - 430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffs, R: 1994, The Algebra of Shapes, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffs, R and Krishnamurti, R: 1998, An algebraic approach to comparing representations, in J. Barallo (ed.), Mathematics & Design 98, The University of the Basque Country, San Sebastian, pp. 105 - 114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffs, R and Krishnamurti, R: 1996, The extensibility and applicability of geometric representations, Architecture Proceedings of 3rd Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning Conference, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, pp. 436 - 452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffs, R, Krishnamurti, R and Eastman, CM: 1996, A formal structure for nonequivalent solid representations, in S Finger, M Mäntylä and T Tomiyama (eds), Proceedings of IFIP WG 5.2 Workshop on Knowledge Intensive CAD II, International Federation for Information Processing, Working Group 5.2, pp. 269 - 289.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, JP: 1999, Modeling Architectural Design Information by Features, Ph.D. Dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, JP and de Vries, B: 2000, Modelling with features and the formalisation of early design knowledge, in R Gonçalves, A Steiger-Garçao and R Scherer (eds), Product and Process Modeling in Building and Construction, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 167176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woestenenk, K: 1998, A common construction vocabulary, in R Amor (ed.), Product and Process Modelling in the Building Industry, Building Research Establishment, Watford, pp. 561 - 568.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stouffs, R., Krishnamurti, R. (2002). Representational Flexibility for Design. In: Gero, J.S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design ’02. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0795-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0795-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6059-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0795-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics