Abstract
We have reached a position today from which to evaluate judiciously Lakatos’ contribution to the philosophy of mathematics. We should applaud unreservedly his decision to take the development of mathematics as a topic worthy of philosophical consideration and admire the first steps he took to elucidate patterns of theory change via his identification of certain mechanisms of concept-stretching. We must recognise, however, that the method of proofs and refutations accounts only for the modification of a concept’s definition,1 omitting more fundamental varieties of theory development, and consequently that much remains to be done. The two tasks before us today are to describe an expanded range of varieties of theory production, especially radically innovative mathematical conceptualisations, and to ponder the philosophical issues relating to such a description. Regarding the former, see Corfield (1998a) and Kvasz (1998). Through this paper I shall largely confine myself to the latter, endeavouring to convey a sense of the vast array of possibilities now open to us.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Aspray W. and Kitcher P. (eds.) (1988) History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics. University of Minnesota Press.
Atiyah M. (1977) Trends in Pure Mathematics. Printed in Atiyah (1987), pp. 263–276.
Atiyah M. (1978) ‘The Unity of Mathematics’, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 10, pp. 69–76. Reprinted in Atiyah (1987), pp. 277–286.
Atiyah M. (1984) ‘An Interview with Michael Atiyah’, Mathematical Intelligencer 6, No. 1. Reprinted in Atiyah (1987), pp. 297–307.
Atiyah M. (1987) Collected Works Vol. l: Early Papers General Papers. Oxford University Press.
Atiyah M. (1988) Collected Works Vol. 4: Index Theorem 2. Oxford University Press.
Atiyah M. (1995) ‘Quantum Theory and Geometry’ Journal of Mathematical Physics 36 (11), pp. 6069–72.
Boi L. (1992) The ‘Revolution’ in the Geometrical Vision of Space in the Nineteenth Century and the Hermeneutical Epistemology of Mathematics. Chapter 10 of Gillies (1992).
Corfield D. (1997) ‘Assaying Lakatos’s Philosophy of Mathematics’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science28(1), pp. 99 121.
Corfield D. (1998a) ‘Beyond the Methodology of Mathematics Research Programmes’ Philosophia Mathematica pp. 272–301.
Corfield D. (1998b) ‘Come the Revolution.’, a critical notice of Hintikka (1996) Philosophical Books39(3), pp. 150–156.
Corry, L. (1996) Modern Algebra and the Rise of Mathematical Structures.Birkhaüser Verlag, Boston.
Crowe M. (1990) `Duhem and The History and Philosophy of Mathematics’, Synthese 83, pp. 431–47.
Feferman S. (1981) The Logic of Mathematical Discovery vs. the Logical Structure of Mathematics. PSA 1978, Vol. 2, pp. 309–327.
Fukuyama F. (1989) ‘The End of History?’, The National Interest, Summer 1989, pp. 3–18.
Galison P. (1987) How Experiments End. University of Chicago Press.
Gilbert, N. and Porter, T. (1994) Knots and Surfaces. Oxford University Press.
Gillies D. (ed.) (1992) Revolutions in Mathematics Oxford University Press.
Glas E. (1989) ‘Testing the Philosophy of Mathematics in the History of Mathematics. (a) The Socio-cognitive Process of Conceptual Change, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 20, pp. 115–131.
Goodale M. (1995) ‘The Cortical Organisation of Visual Perception’ in: Visual Cognition, An Invitation to Cognitive Science, 2nd edn. Vol. 2, S. Kosslyn and D. Osherson (eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Hacking I. (1996) ‘The Disunities of the Sciences’, in: The Disunity of Science: Boundaries,Contexts and Power, P. Galison and D. Stump (eds.). Stanford University Press.
Heidegger M. (1962) Being and Time. Translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson, Harper and Row, New York.
Hintikka J. (1996) The Principles of Mathematics Revisited. Cambridge University Press.
Jaffe A. and Quinn F. (1993) “‘Theoretical Mathematics”: Towards a Cultural Synthesis of Mathematics and Theoretical Physics’ Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 29, pp. 1–13.
Kitcher P. (1983) The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Kline M. (1972) Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. Oxford University Press.
Kuhn T. (1962/70) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn T. (1976) ‘Mathematical Versus Experimental Traditions’ The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7. Reprinted as Chapter 3 of The Essential Tension. University of Chicago Press, 1977.
Kvasz L. (1998) ‘History of Geometry and the Development of the Form of Language’. Synthese 116, pp. 141–186.
Lakatos I. (1976) Proofs and Refutations The Logic of Mathematical Discovery J.Worrall and E. Zahar (eds.), Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos I. (1978) Mathematics, Science and Epistemology, Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, J. Worrall and G. Currie (eds.), Cambridge University Press.
MacLane S. (1986) Mathematics: Form and Function. Springer Verlag, New York.
Margolis J. (1989) The Persistence of Reality III: Texts without Referents. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Marquis J.-P. (1997) ‘Abstract Mathematical Tools and Machines for Mathematics’ Philosophia Mathematica (3), Vol. 5, pp. 250–272.
McLarty C. (1990) ‘The Uses and Abuses of the History of Topos Theory’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41, pp. 351–375.
Mehrtens H. (1976) ‘T.S. Kuhn’s Theories and Mathematics’, Historia Mathematica 3, pp. 297320. Reprinted as Chapter 2 of Gillies (1992).
Mehrtens H. (1990) Moderne-Sprache-Mathematik. Suhrkamp.
Mehrtens H. (1992) Appendix (1992): Revolutions Reconsidered. Chapter 3 of Gillies (1992).
Metropolis N. (1993) ‘The Age of Computing: A Personal Memoir’, in: A New Era in Computing, N. Metropolis and G.-C. Rota (eds.), MIT Press, pp. 119–130.
Petitot J. (1992) ‘Schématisme, sciences cognitives et physiques mathématiques: hommage à Ferdinand Gonseth’, in: Espace et Horizon de Réalité,M. Panza and J.-C. Pont (eds.), Masson, Paris.
Pickering A. (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. The University of Chicago Press.
Polya G. (1954) Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, Vol. I: Induction and Analogy in Mathematics,Princeton Universtiy Press.
Restivo, S. (1992) Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Ruelle D. (1988) ‘Is our Mathematics Natural? The Case of Equilibrium Statistics’ Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 19, pp. 259–268
Sierpinska, A. (1994) Understanding in Mathematics. The Falmer Press, London.
Talmy L. (1985) ‘Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition’ Cognitive Science 12, pp. 49–100.
Thurston W. (1994) ‘On Proof and Progress in Mathematics’ Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 30, No. 2
Weil A. (1974) Two Lectures On Number Theory Past and Present. Collected Papers, Vol. 3, pp.279–302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Corfield, D. (2002). Argumentation and the Mathematical Process. In: Kampis, G., Kvasz, L., Stöltzner, M. (eds) Appraising Lakatos. Vienna Circle Institute Library, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0769-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0769-5_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5922-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0769-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive