Skip to main content

Argumentation and the Mathematical Process

  • Chapter
Appraising Lakatos

Part of the book series: Vienna Circle Institute Library ((VCIL,volume 1))

Abstract

We have reached a position today from which to evaluate judiciously Lakatos’ contribution to the philosophy of mathematics. We should applaud unreservedly his decision to take the development of mathematics as a topic worthy of philosophical consideration and admire the first steps he took to elucidate patterns of theory change via his identification of certain mechanisms of concept-stretching. We must recognise, however, that the method of proofs and refutations accounts only for the modification of a concept’s definition,1 omitting more fundamental varieties of theory development, and consequently that much remains to be done. The two tasks before us today are to describe an expanded range of varieties of theory production, especially radically innovative mathematical conceptualisations, and to ponder the philosophical issues relating to such a description. Regarding the former, see Corfield (1998a) and Kvasz (1998). Through this paper I shall largely confine myself to the latter, endeavouring to convey a sense of the vast array of possibilities now open to us.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aspray W. and Kitcher P. (eds.) (1988) History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah M. (1977) Trends in Pure Mathematics. Printed in Atiyah (1987), pp. 263–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah M. (1978) ‘The Unity of Mathematics’, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 10, pp. 69–76. Reprinted in Atiyah (1987), pp. 277–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah M. (1984) ‘An Interview with Michael Atiyah’, Mathematical Intelligencer 6, No. 1. Reprinted in Atiyah (1987), pp. 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah M. (1987) Collected Works Vol. l: Early Papers General Papers. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah M. (1988) Collected Works Vol. 4: Index Theorem 2. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah M. (1995) ‘Quantum Theory and Geometry’ Journal of Mathematical Physics 36 (11), pp. 6069–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boi L. (1992) The ‘Revolution’ in the Geometrical Vision of Space in the Nineteenth Century and the Hermeneutical Epistemology of Mathematics. Chapter 10 of Gillies (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corfield D. (1997) ‘Assaying Lakatos’s Philosophy of Mathematics’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science28(1), pp. 99 121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corfield D. (1998a) ‘Beyond the Methodology of Mathematics Research Programmes’ Philosophia Mathematica pp. 272–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corfield D. (1998b) ‘Come the Revolution.’, a critical notice of Hintikka (1996) Philosophical Books39(3), pp. 150–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corry, L. (1996) Modern Algebra and the Rise of Mathematical Structures.Birkhaüser Verlag, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe M. (1990) `Duhem and The History and Philosophy of Mathematics’, Synthese 83, pp. 431–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feferman S. (1981) The Logic of Mathematical Discovery vs. the Logical Structure of Mathematics. PSA 1978, Vol. 2, pp. 309–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F. (1989) ‘The End of History?’, The National Interest, Summer 1989, pp. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison P. (1987) How Experiments End. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. and Porter, T. (1994) Knots and Surfaces. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies D. (ed.) (1992) Revolutions in Mathematics Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glas E. (1989) ‘Testing the Philosophy of Mathematics in the History of Mathematics. (a) The Socio-cognitive Process of Conceptual Change, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 20, pp. 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodale M. (1995) ‘The Cortical Organisation of Visual Perception’ in: Visual Cognition, An Invitation to Cognitive Science, 2nd edn. Vol. 2, S. Kosslyn and D. Osherson (eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking I. (1996) ‘The Disunities of the Sciences’, in: The Disunity of Science: Boundaries,Contexts and Power, P. Galison and D. Stump (eds.). Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M. (1962) Being and Time. Translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka J. (1996) The Principles of Mathematics Revisited. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe A. and Quinn F. (1993) “‘Theoretical Mathematics”: Towards a Cultural Synthesis of Mathematics and Theoretical Physics’ Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 29, pp. 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P. (1983) The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline M. (1972) Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T. (1962/70) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T. (1976) ‘Mathematical Versus Experimental Traditions’ The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7. Reprinted as Chapter 3 of The Essential Tension. University of Chicago Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvasz L. (1998) ‘History of Geometry and the Development of the Form of Language’. Synthese 116, pp. 141–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos I. (1976) Proofs and Refutations The Logic of Mathematical Discovery J.Worrall and E. Zahar (eds.), Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos I. (1978) Mathematics, Science and Epistemology, Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, J. Worrall and G. Currie (eds.), Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacLane S. (1986) Mathematics: Form and Function. Springer Verlag, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis J. (1989) The Persistence of Reality III: Texts without Referents. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis J.-P. (1997) ‘Abstract Mathematical Tools and Machines for Mathematics’ Philosophia Mathematica (3), Vol. 5, pp. 250–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLarty C. (1990) ‘The Uses and Abuses of the History of Topos Theory’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41, pp. 351–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrtens H. (1976) ‘T.S. Kuhn’s Theories and Mathematics’, Historia Mathematica 3, pp. 297320. Reprinted as Chapter 2 of Gillies (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrtens H. (1990) Moderne-Sprache-Mathematik. Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrtens H. (1992) Appendix (1992): Revolutions Reconsidered. Chapter 3 of Gillies (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis N. (1993) ‘The Age of Computing: A Personal Memoir’, in: A New Era in Computing, N. Metropolis and G.-C. Rota (eds.), MIT Press, pp. 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitot J. (1992) ‘Schématisme, sciences cognitives et physiques mathématiques: hommage à Ferdinand Gonseth’, in: Espace et Horizon de Réalité,M. Panza and J.-C. Pont (eds.), Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering A. (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya G. (1954) Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, Vol. I: Induction and Analogy in Mathematics,Princeton Universtiy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restivo, S. (1992) Mathematics in Society and History: Sociological Inquiries. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruelle D. (1988) ‘Is our Mathematics Natural? The Case of Equilibrium Statistics’ Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 19, pp. 259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierpinska, A. (1994) Understanding in Mathematics. The Falmer Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy L. (1985) ‘Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition’ Cognitive Science 12, pp. 49–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston W. (1994) ‘On Proof and Progress in Mathematics’ Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 30, No. 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil A. (1974) Two Lectures On Number Theory Past and Present. Collected Papers, Vol. 3, pp.279–302.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Corfield, D. (2002). Argumentation and the Mathematical Process. In: Kampis, G., Kvasz, L., Stöltzner, M. (eds) Appraising Lakatos. Vienna Circle Institute Library, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0769-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0769-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5922-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0769-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics