Abstract
My intention in this paper is to draw connections between three areas of recent interest in the philosophy of science, broadly characterised: the introduction of partial structures into the model-theoretic or ‘semantic’ approach, the underlying structure of pursuit and heuristics and the recent emphasis on scientific ‘practice’. The connections are, perhaps, obvious, but worth highlighting nonetheless and they have not to my knowledge yet been fully explored.
I would like to thank James Ladyman for numerous discussions of these topics and for prompting many of the ideas presented here. Whatever is right or interesting about them is largely down to him. I would also like to thank Otávio Bueno, whose email conversations helped me get clear on a number of points. Finally, a version of this paper was presented at a meeting of the British Society for the Philosophy of Science and I would like to thank Jim Cushing, Colin Howson, David Papineau, Stathis Psillos, Mauricio Suárez and John Worrall for their interesting and useful comments. Of course, the responsibility for all errors and infelicities, philosophical or otherwise, is entirely mine.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Collier, J.D. (1992), ‘Critical Notice: Paul Thompson, The Structure of Biological Theories’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22, pp. 287–298
Costa, N.C.A. and French, S. (1990) ‘The Model-Theoretic Approach in the Philosophy of Science’, Philosophy of Science 57 pp. 248–265
Costa, N.C.A.and French, S. (1993), ‘Towards an Acceptable Theory of Acceptance’, in S. French and H. Kamminga, Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics; D. Reidel, pp. 137–158.
Downes, S. (1992) ‘The Importance of Models in Theorizing: A Deflationary Semantic View’, PSA 1992 Vol. 1, pp. 142–153
French, S. (1995), ‘The Esperable Uberty of Quantum Chromodynamics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26 pp. 87–105.
French, S. and Ladyman, J. (forthcoming), ‘Reinflating the Semantic Approach’; submitted. Giere, R.N. (1988), Explaining Science; University of Chicago Press.
Gremmen, B. (1995), ‘The Structure of Scientific Practice’, paper read at the 10th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, August 19–25 1995, Florence, Italy.
Huggett, N. (1995), ‘A New Criterion for Theory Equivalence’, paper read at the 10th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, August 1925 1995, Florence, Italy.
Koertge, N. (1993), ‘Ideology, Heuristics and Rationality in the Context of Discovery’, in S. French and H. Kamminga, Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics; D. Reidel, pp. 125–136.
Kuhn, T.S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions; University of Chicago Press, 2nd ed.
Laudan, L. (1980), ‘Why was the Logic of Discovery Abandoned?’, in T. Nickels (ed.) Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality; D. Reidel, pp. 173–183.
Liu, C. (1995), ‘Gauge Invariance and its Metaphysical Nature’, paper read at the 10th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, August 1925 1995, Florence, Italy.
Lloyd, E. (1988), The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory,Greenwood Press
Mikenberg, I., da Costa, N.C.A. and Chuaqui, R. (1986), `Pragmatic Truth and Approximation to Truth’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 pp. 201–221.
Nersessian, N. (1993), ‘How Do Scientists Think? Capturing the Dynamics of Conceptual Change in Science’ in R.N. Giere (ed.), Cognitive Models in Science, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XV, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–44
Olivé, L. (1985), ‘Realismo e antirrealismo en la concepciôn semântica de las teorfas’, Critica 17 pp. 31–38; English summary pp. 39–40
Pérez Ransanz, A.R. (1985), ‘El concepto de teorfa empfrica segün van Fraassen’, Crftica 17 pp. 3–12; English summary pp. 13–19
Pickering, A. (1984), Constructing Quarks; Edinburgh University Press.
Pickering, A. (1990), ‘Knowledge, Practice and Mere Construction’; Social Studies of Science 20 pp. 682–729.
Pickering, A. (1992), ‘From Science as Knowledge to Science as Practice’, in A. Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture; University of Chicago Press, 1992, pp.1–26.
Pickering, A. and Stephanides, A. (1992), ‘Constructing Quaternions: On the Analysis of Conceptual Practice’, in Pickering (ed.), op. cit., pp.139–167.
Post, H.R. (1971), ‘Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics’; Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2 pp. 213–255.
Redhead, M.L.G. (1975), ‘Symmetry in Intertheory Relations’, Synthese 32 pp. 77–112.
Suárez, M. (forthcominga), ‘Idealization and the Semantic View of Scientific Theories’, preprint.
Suárez, M. (forthcomingb), ‘How Theories save Phenomena: A Case Against Embedding’, preprint.
Suppe, F. (1989), The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism; Univ. of Illinois Press.
Suppes, P. (1967), Set-Theoretical Structures in Science; mimeograph, Stanford University. Suppes, P. (1984), Probabilistic Metaphysics,Blackwell.
Thompson, P.(1989), The Structure of Biological Theories,State University of New York Press.
van Fraassen, B. (1985), The Scientific Image,Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
French, S. (1997). Partiality, Pursuit and Practice. In: Chiara, M.L.D., Doets, K., Mundici, D., Van Benthem, J. (eds) Structures and Norms in Science. Synthese Library, vol 260. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0538-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0538-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4787-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0538-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive