Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methodology for Multi-Scale Land-Use Change Modelling: Concepts and Challenges

  • Chapter
Global Environmental Change and Land Use

Abstract

Land cover is defined as the layer of soils and biomass, including natural vegetation, crops and human structures that cover the land surface. Land use refers to the purposes for which humans exploit the land-cover (Fresco, 1994). Land-cover change is the complete replacement of one cover type by another, while land-use changes also include the modification of land-cover types, e.g., intensification of agricultural use, without changing its overall classification (Turner II et al., 1993).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adger N.W. (1999) Evolution of economy and environment: an application to land use in lowland Vietnam. Ecological Economics 31, 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen T.F.H. and Starr T.B. (1982) Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker W.L. and Mladenoff D.J. (1999) Progress and future directions in spatial modeling of forest landscapes. In: Mladenoff D.J., Baker W.L. (eds). Spatial modeling of forest landscape change: approaches and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 333–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzter H., Braun P.W. and Köhler W. (1998) Cellular automata models for vegetation dynamics. Ecological Modelling 107, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier B. (1998) Induced innovation and land degradation: Results from a bioeconomic model of a village in West Africa. Agricultural Economics 19, 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborrow R.E. and Okoth Ogondo H.W.O. (1992) Population-driven changes in land use in developing countries. Ambio 21, 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingsheng K. (1996) Regional inequality in rural development. In: Garnaut R., Shutian G., Guonan M. (eds). The third revolution in the Chinese countryside. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie P.M. (1985) The political economy of soil erosion in developing countries. Longman, Harlow (UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockstael N.E. and Irwin E.G. (2000) Economics and the Land Use-Environment Link. In: Folmer H., Tietenberg T. (eds). The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 1999/2000. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouman B.A.M. Jansen H., Schipper R.A., Nieuwenhuyse H. and Bouma J. (1999) A framework for integrated biophysical and economic land use analysis at different scales. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 75, 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bousquet F., Bakam I., Proton H. and Le Page C. (1998) Cormas: common-pool resources and multiagent systems. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1416, 826–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown D.G., Pijanowski B.C. and Duh J.D. (2000) Modeling the relationships between land use and land cover on private lands in the Upper Midwest, USA. Journal of Environmental Management 59, 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candau J. (2000) Calibrating a cellular automaton model of urban growth in a timely manner. In: Parks B.O., Clarke K.M., Crane M.P. (eds). Proceedings of the 4th international conference on integrating geographic information systems and environmental modeling: problems, prospects, and needs for research; 2000, Sep 2–8. University of Colorado, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin F.S., Zavaleta E.S., Eviner V.T., Naylor R.L., Vitousek P.M., Reynolds H.L., Hooper D.U., Lavorel S., Sala O.E., Robbie S.E., Mack M.C. and Diaz S. (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405, 234–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chomitz K.M. and Gray D.A. (1996) Roads, Land Use, and Deforestation: A spatial model applied to Belize. The World Bank Economic Review 10, 487–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway G.R. (1987) The properties of agro-ecosystems. Agricultural Systems 24, 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubert R.M., Goktekin T., Fishwick P.A. (1997) MOOSE: architecture of an object-oriented multimodeling simulation system. Proceedings of Enabling Technology for Simulation Science. Orlando Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers, Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot W.T. (1992) Environmental science theory; Concepts and methods in a one-world problem oriented paradigm. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot W.T. (1999) Van Vriend naar Vijand naar Verslagene en Verder, Een evolutionair perspectief op de verhouding tussen mens en natuur. Nijmegen University Press, Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot, W. T. and Kamminga, E. M. (1995) Forest, People, Government: A policy-oriented analysis of the social dynamics of tropical deforestation. 410100117. Bilthoven, Dutch National Programme on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Koning G.H.J., Veldkamp A. and Fresco L.O. (1998) Land use in Ecuador: a statistical analysis at different aggregation levels. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 70, 321–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Koning G.H.J., Veldkamp A. and Fresco L.O. (1999) Exploring changes in Ecuadorian land use for food production and their effects on natural resources. Journal of Environmental Management 57, 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIAS. (1995) The Dynamic Information Architecture System: a High Level Architecture for Modeling and Simulation. Advanced Computer Applications Center, Argonne National Laboratory http://www.dis.anl.gov/DEEM/DIAS/diaswp.html.

  • Dietz T., and Rosa E.A. (1997) Effects of Population and Affluence on Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94, 175–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dovers S.R. (1995) A framework for scaling and framing policy problems in sustainability. Ecological Economics 12, 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelen G., White R., Uljee I. and Drazan P. (1995) Using Cellular Automata for Integrated Modelling of Socio-Environmental Systems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 34, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrow A. and Winograd M. (2001) Land Use Modelling at the Regional Scale: an input to Rural Sustainability Indicators for Central America. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 85, 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside P.M. and Imbrozia R. (1998) Soil carbon changes from conversion of forest to pasture in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 108, 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer G. and Sun L.X. (2001) Model based analysis of future land-use development in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 85, 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham A.S. (2000) Context-dependent spatial analysis: A role for GIS? Journal of Geographical Systems 2, 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fresco L.O. (1994) Imaginable futures, a contribution to thinking about land use planning. In: Fresco L.O., Stroosnijder L., Bouma J., van Keulen H. (eds). The future of the land: Mobilising and Integrating Knowledge for Land Use Options. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner R.H. (1998) Pattern, process, and the analysis of spatial scales. In: Peterson D.L., Parker V.T. (eds). Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications. Columbia University Press, New York, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan J., Pritchard J.R.L., Ogneva-Himmelberger Y., Chowdhury R.R., Sanderson S. and Turner II B.L. (1998) ‘Socializing the Pixel’ and ‘Pixelizing the Social’ in Land-Use and Land-Cover Change. In: Liverman D., Moran E.F., Rindfuss R.R., Stern P.C. (eds). People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science. National Academy Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson C.C., Ostrom E. and Anh T.K. (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecological Economics 32, 217–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, R. (2000) Platforms and Terraces. GIS as a Tool for Interactive Land Use Negotiation. Wageningen and Enschede, Wageningen University and ITC. PhD thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild M.F. (2000) The current status of GIS and spatial analysis. Journal of Geographical Systems 2, 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin B.J., Fahrig L. (1998) Spatial Scaling and Animal Population Dynamics. In: Peterson D.L., Parker V.T. (eds). Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications. Columbia University Press, New York, 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebler D., Strom M., Daniel T.C. (1994) The SWARM Simulation System and Individual-based Modeling.Decision Support 2001: 17th Annual Geographic Information Seminar and Resource Technology ‘84 Symposium, Toronto, 474–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans R.J. and Van Ittersum M.K. (1996) Aggregation of spatial units in linear programming models to explore land use options. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 44, 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolling C.S. (1992) Cross-scale morphology, geometry, and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecological Monographs 62, 447–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling C.S. and Sanderson S. (1996) Dynamics of (Dis)harmony in Ecological and Social Systems. In: Hanna S., Folke C., Mäler K.G., Jansson A. (eds). Rights to nature: Ecological, economic, cultural, and political principles of institutions for the environment. Island Press, Washington, 57–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes R.F., Kauffman J.B. and Cummings D.L. (2000) Fire in the Brazilian Amazon. 3. Dynamics of Biomass, C, and Nutrient Pools in Regenerating Forests. Oecologia 124, 574–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC. (1997) Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Workbook. Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen H. and Stoorvogel J.J. (1998) Quantification of Aggregation Bias in Regional Agricultural Land Use Models: Application to Guacimo County, Costa Rica. Agricultural Systems 58, 417–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones D.W., Dale V.H., Beuchamp J.J., Pedlowske M.A. and O’Neill R.V. (1995) Farming in Rondonia. Resource and Energy Economics 17, 155–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaimowitz, D. and Angelsen, A. (1998) Economic Models of Tropical Defor- estation — A Review. Bogor, Center for International Forestry Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok K. and Veldkamp A. (2001) Evaluating impact of spatial scales on land use pattern analysis in Central America. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 85, 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolasa J. and Rollo C.D. (1991) Introduction: The Heterogeneity of Heterogeneity — a Glossary. In: Kolasa J., Pickett S.T.A. (eds). Ecological Heterogeneity. Springer Verlag, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E.F. (1997) Modelling and monitoring land-cover change processes in tropical regions. Progress in Physical Geography 21, 375–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, E. F., Baulies, X., Bockstael, N. E., Fischer, G., Krug, T., Leemans, R., Moran, E. F., Rindfuss, R. R., Sato, Y., Skole, D., Turner II, B. L, and Vogel, C. (2000a) Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC), Implementation Strategy. IGBP Report 48, IHDP Report 10. Stockholm, Bonn, IGBP, IHDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E.F., Turner II B.L., Geist H.J., Agbola S.B., Angelsen A., Bruce J.W., Coomes O., Dirzo R., Fischer G., Folke C., George P.S., Homewood K., Imbernon J., Leemans R., Li X.B., Moran E.F., Mortimore M., Ramakrishnan P.S., Richards J.F., Skanes H., Stone G.D., Svedin U., Veldkamp A., Vogel C. and Xu J.C. (2000b) The Causes of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: Moving Beyond the Myths. LUCC discussion paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebel, L. and Murdiyarso, D. (1998) Modelling Global Change Impacts on Tropical Landscapes and Biodiversity. 5. Bogor, BIOTROP-GCTE/ Impacts Centre for Southeast Asia (IC-SEA). IC-SEA Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin S.A. (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73, 1943–1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin S.A. (1998) Ecosystems and the Biosphere as Complex Adaptive Systems. Ecosystems 1, 431–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin S.A., Barrett S., Aniyar S., Baumol W., Bliss C., Bolin B., Dasgupta P., Ehrlich P., Folke C., Gren I.M., Holling C.S., Jansson A.M., Jansson B.O., Mäler K.G., Martin D., Perrings C. and Sheshinski E. (1998) Resilience in natural and socio-economic systems. Environment and Development Economics 3, 222–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz R. (1997) HLA Object Model Development: A Process View, Simulation Interoperability Workshop. Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, Orlando http://siso.sc.ist.ucf.edu/siw/97spring/ papers/010.pdf.

  • Manson S.M. (2000) Agent-based dynamic spatial simulation of land-use/cover change in the Yucatan peninsula, Mexico. In: Parks B.O., Clarke K.M., Crane M.P. (eds). Proceedings of the 4th international conference on integrating geographic information systems and environmental modeling: problems, prospects, and needs for research; 2000 Sep 2–8; Boulder. University of Colorado, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meentemeyer V. (1989) Geographical perspectives of space, time, and scale. Landscape Ecology 3, 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens B., Sunderlin W.D., Ndoye O. and Lambin E.F. (2000) Impact of Macroeconomic Change on Deforestation in South Cameroon: Integration of Household Survey and Remotely-Sensed Data. World Development 28, 983–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran E.F. (2000) Progress in the last ten years in the study of land use/cover change and the outlook for the next decade. In: Diekmann A., Dietz T., Jaeger C.C., Rosa E.A. (eds). Studying the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill R.V., Johnson A.R. and King A.W. (1989) A hierarchical framework for the analysis of scale. Landscape Ecology 3, 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill R.V. and King A.W. (1998) Homage to St. Michael; or, Why Are There So Many Books on Scale? In: Peterson D.L., Parker V.T. (eds). Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications. Columbia University Press, New York, 316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojima D.S., Galvin K.A. and Turner II B.L. (1994) The global impact of land-use change. BioScience 44, 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D. and Brown K. (1994) Saving the world’s tropical forests. In: Brown K., Pearce D. (eds). The causes of tropical deforestation, the economic and statistical analysis of factors giving rise to the loss of tropical forests. University College London Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff A.S.P. (1999) What Drives Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon? Evidence from Satellite and Socioeconomic Data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37, 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontius R.G., Cornell J.D. and Hall C.A.S. (2001) Modeling the spatial pattern of land-use change with GEOMOD2: Application and validation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 85, 191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss R.R. and Stern P.C. (1998) Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science: The Need and the Challenges. In: Liverman D., Moran E.F., Rindfuss R.R., Stern P.C. (eds). People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science. National Academy Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling N. and Maarleveld N. (1999) Facing strategic narratives: An argument for interactive effectiveness. Agriculture and Human Values 16, 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders L., Pumain D., Mathian H., Guerin-Pace F. and Bura S. (1997) SIMPOP: a multi-agent system for the study of urbanism. Environment and Planning B 24, 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoorl J.M. and Veldkamp A. (2001) Linking land use and landscape process modelling: a case study for the Alora region (South Spain). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 85, 281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smaling E.M.A. and Fresco L.O. (1993) A decision-support model for monitoring nutrient balances under agricultural land use (NUTMON). Geoderma 60, 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner II B.L. (1994) Local faces, global flows: the role of land use and land cover in global environmental change. Land degradation and rehabilitation 5, 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner II B.L. (1997) Spirals, Bridges and Tunnels: Engaging Human— Environment Perspectives in Geography. Ecumene 4, 196–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner II B.L. and Brush S.B. (1987) Comparative farming systems. Guilford Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner II, B.L, Ross, R. H., and Skole, D. L. (1993) Relating land use and global land cover change. IGDP report no. 24; HDP report no. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner II, B. L., Skole, D. L., Sanderson, S., Fischer, G., Fresco, L. O., and Leemans, R. (1995) Land-Use and Land Cover Change — Science/Research Plan. IGBP Report No. 35; HDP Report No. 7. Stockholm and Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.D. (1999) Merging Local and Regional Analyses of Land-Use Change: The Case of Livestock in the Sahel. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89, 191–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G. and Gardner R.H. (1992) Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology: an introduction. In: Turner M.G., Gardner R.H. (eds). Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Top G.M. (1998) The social dynamics of deforestation in the Sierra Madre, Philippines. Thesis Leiden University, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer J., van Noordwijk M., Anderson J., Ong C. and Perfecto I. (1998) Global change and multi-species agroecosystems: concepts and issues. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 67, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay J.K. (1998) FLORES: for exploring land use options in forested landscapes. Agroforestry forum 9, 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vayda A.P. (1983) Progressive contextualization: methods for research in human ecology. Human Ecology 11, 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp A. and Fresco L.O. (1996) CLUE-CR: an integrated multi-scale model to simulate land use change scenarios in Costa Rica. Ecological Modelling 91, 231–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp A. and Fresco L.O. (1997) Reconstructing land use drivers and their spatial scale dependence for Costa Rica. Agricultural Systems 55, 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P.H. and Chen Y.Q. (2000) Multi-scale characterization of land-use patterns in China. Ecosystems 3, 369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P.H., Chen Y.Q. and Veldkamp A. (2000) Spatial explorations of land-use change and grain production in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 82, 333–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P.H. and Denier van der Gon H.A.C. (2001) Spatial and temporal dynamics of methane emissions from agricultural sources in China. Global Change Biology 7, 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P.H., Veldkamp A., de Koning G.H.J., Kok K. and Bouma J. 1999a. A spatial explicit allocation procedure for modelling the pattern of land use change based upon actual land use. Ecological Modelling 116, 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P.H., Veldkamp A., Fresco L.O. (1999b) Simulation of changes in the spatial pattern of land use in China. Applied Geography 19, 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker R., Moran E.F., Anselin L. (2000) Deforestation and Cattle Ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: External Capital and Household Processes. World Development 28, 683–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh S.J., Evans T.P., Welsh W.F., Entwisle B. and Rindfuss RR. (1999) Scale-Dependent Relationships between Population and Environment in Northeastern Thailand. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 65, 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson M.K. (1978) The scale problem in human geography. Geografiska Annaler 60B, 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wear D.N., Turner M.G., Naiman R.J. (1998) Land cover along an urban-rural gradient: implications for water quality. Ecological Applications 8, 619–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbanks T.J. and Kates R.W. (1999) Global changes in local places: How scale matters. Climatic Change 43, 601–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu E (1998) Simulating urban encroachment on rural land with fuzzy-logiccontrolled cellular automata in a geographical information system. Journal of Environmental Management 53, 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer K.S. (1991) Wetland production and smallholder persistence: agricultural change in a highland Peruvian region. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81, 443–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University and Research Centre, The Netherlands

    P. H. Verburg & A. J. Veldkamp

  2. Centre of Environmental Science, Leiden University, The Netherlands

    W. T. de Groot

Authors
  1. P. H. Verburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. T. de Groot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. J. Veldkamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Free University Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    A. J. Dolman

  2. Plant Research International, Wageningen University and Research Centre, The Netherlands

    A. Verhagen

  3. National Research Programme on Global Air Pollution and Climate Change, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

    C. A. Rovers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Verburg, P.H., de Groot, W.T., Veldkamp, A.J. (2003). Methodology for Multi-Scale Land-Use Change Modelling: Concepts and Challenges. In: Dolman, A.J., Verhagen, A., Rovers, C.A. (eds) Global Environmental Change and Land Use. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0335-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0335-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6308-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0335-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation