Abstract
As Paul V. Spade remarks “[t]here are many puzzles for historians of medieval logic” and “[o]ne of them concerns the peculiar form of disputation described in treatises de obligationibus.” (Spade 1992, 171.) In the present paper, we claim that the theory of obligationes as presented by Walter Burley in the section de positione of his Treatise on obligations can be seen as a theory of belief change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alchourrón, C. E., Gärdenfors, P., and Makinson, D., 1985. “On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Functions for Contraction and Revision,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530.
Alchourrón, C. E., and Makinson, D., 1981. “Hierarchies of regulations and their logic,” in R. Hilpinen (ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic, Dordrecht, D. Reidel, 125–148.
Ashworth, E. J., 1981. “The Problems of Relevance and Order in Obligational Disputations: Some Later Fourtheenth Century Views,” Medioevo 7, 175–193.
Burley, Walter, 1963. “Tractatus de obligationibus,” ed. R. Green, in The Logical Treatise De obligationibus ’.• An Introduction with Critical Texts of William of Sherwood (?) and Walter Burley, Ph. D. Thesis, Louvain.
Gärdenfors, P., 1988. Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Hansson, S. 0., 1994. “Taking Belief Bases Seriously,” in D. Prawitz and D. Westerstähl (eds.), Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 13–28.
Knuuttila, Simo, 1993. Modalities in Medieval Philosophy, London, Routledge.
Knuuttila, Simo, and Yrjönsuuri, Mikko, 1988. “Norms and Action in Obligational Disputations,” in O. Pluta (ed.), Die Philosophie im 14. und 15. Jahrhundert,(Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie 10), Amsterdam, Grüner, 191–202.
Kretzmann, Norman, and Stump, Eleonore, 1988. The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts: Volume One: Logic and the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Lagerlund, Henrik, 2000. Modal Syllogistics in the Middle Ages,Leiden, Brill. Martin, Christopher, 1993. “Obligations and Liars,” in S. Read (ed.), Sophisms inMedieval Logic and Grammar,Dordrecht, Kluwer, 357–381. Revised version in the present collection, pp. 65–96.
Paul of Venice 1988. Logica Magna,Part II, Fascicule 8, [Tractatus De obligationibus], (ed. with transi. and notes) E. J. Ashworth, (Classical and Medieval Logic Texts, vol. 5), Oxford, British Academy, Oxford University Press. Ramsey, F. P., 1931. “General propositions and causality,” in his Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 237–257
Sobel, J. H., 1970. “Utilitarianisms: Simple and General,” Inquiry 13, 394–449.
Spade, Paul Vincent, 1977. “Roger Swyneshed’s Obligationes: Edition and Comments,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 44, 243–285.
Spade, Paul Vincent, 1982. “Three Theories of Obligationes: Burley, Kilvington and Swyneshed on Counterfactual Reasoning,” History and Philosophy of Logic 3, 1–32
Spade, Paul Vincent, 1992. “If Obligationes Were Counterfactuals,” Philosophical Topics 20, 171–188.
Stalnaker, R., 1968. “A theory of conditionals,” in N. Rescher (ed.) Studies in Logical Theory (American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series, no. 2), Oxford, Blackwell, 98–112
Stump, Eleonore, 1982. “Obligations: A. From The Beginning to The Early Fourteenth Century,” in N. Kretzmann, A. Kenny, J. Pinborg and E. Stump (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy from the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism, 1100–1600, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 315–334.
Yrjönsuuri, Mikko, 1994. Obligationes: 14th Century Logic of Disputational Duties, (Acta Philosophica Fennica 55), Helsinki, Societas Philosophica Fennica.
Yrjönsuuri, Mikko, 1996. “Obligations as Thought Experiments,” in I. Angelelli and M. Cerezo (eds.), Studies in the History of Logic, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 79–96.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lagerlund, H., Olsson, E.J. (2001). Disputation and Change of Belief Burley’s Theory of Obligationes as a Theory of Belief Revision. In: Yrjönsuuri, M. (eds) Medieval Formal Logic. The New Synthese Historical Library, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9713-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9713-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5604-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9713-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive