Skip to main content

The Partial Unification of Domains, Hybrids, and the Growth of Mathematical Knowledge

  • Chapter
The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 289))

Abstract

Relations among distinct areas of mathematical activity are most commonly discussed in terms of the reduction of axiomatized theories, where reduction is defined to be the deductive derivation of the axioms of the reduced theory as theorems of the reducing theory. Such derivation requires that the characteristic vocabulary of the reduced theory be redefined in terms of the vocabulary of the reducing theory; these definitions are called bridge laws. In this century, philosophers of mathematics have discussed relations among arithmetic, geometry, predicate logic, and set theory in these terms, and have claimed variously that geometry may be reduced to arithmetic, arithmetic to predicate logic, and arithmetic and geometry to set theory. Their arguments run parallel to those made by philosophers of science, who claim variously that biology may be reduced to chemistry and chemistry to physics, and that within physics, classical mechanics may be reduced to some combination of relativity theory and quantum mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bos, H. J. M. (1974/5). “Differentials, Higher-Order Differentials, and the Derivative in the Leibnizian Calculus.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences. Vol. 14: 1–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, H. J. M. (1981). “On the Representation of Curves in Descartes’ Géométrie.” Archive for History of the Exact Sciences. Vol. 24: 295–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, H. J. M. (1988). “Tractional Motion and the Legitimation of Transcendental Curves.” Centaurus. Vol. 31: 9–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1954). D. E. Smith and M. L. Latham (Eds.). The Geometry of René Descartes. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, D.(Ed.). (1992). Revolutions in Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz, E. (1991). Cartesian Method and the Problem of Reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz, E. (1992). “Was Leibniz a Mathematical Revolutionary?” in (Gillies 1992, 117–33).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim, P. (1948). “Studies in the Logic of Explanation,” Philosophy of Science. Vol. 15: 491–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1971). Mathematische Schriften. C. I.Gerhardt (Ed.). Georg Olms Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maull, N. (1977). “Unifying Science Without Reduction,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Vol. 8: 143–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1949). “The Meaning of Reduction in the Natural Sciences,” in (Stauffer 1949, 99–135).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T. (1973). “Two Concepts of Inter-Theoretic Reduction,” Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 70: 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrlich, F. (1988). “Pluralistic Ontology and Theory Reduction in the Physical Sciences.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 39: 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E. (1991). “The Electronic Configuration Model, Quantum Mechanics, and Reduction.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 42, No. 4: 309–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K. (1974). “The Peripherality of Reductionism in the Development of Molecular Biology.” Journal of the History of Biology. Vol. 7: 111–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, R. C. (1949). Science and Civilization. Madison: University of Wiscons in Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grosholz, E.R. (2000). The Partial Unification of Domains, Hybrids, and the Growth of Mathematical Knowledge. In: Grosholz, E., Breger, H. (eds) The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge. Synthese Library, vol 289. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9558-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9558-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5391-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9558-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics