Skip to main content

Severing the External Argument from its Verb

  • Chapter
Phrase Structure and the Lexicon

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 33))

Abstract

In his analysis of action sentences, Donald Davidson drew a clear distinction between arguments and adjuncts. Neglecting temporal relations, sentences like

  1. (1)

    We bought your slippers in Marrakesh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abney, Steven: 1987, The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon: 1977, Five Chapters on Natural Language Metaphysics, unpublished, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark: 1985, ‘Syntactic affixation and English gerunds’, in Jeffrey Goldberg, Susannah MacKaye and Michael T. Wescoat (eds.), West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 4, Stanford Linguistics Association, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark: 1988, Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson and Ian Roberts: 1989, ‘Passive Arguments Raised’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 219–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch, Manfred: 1983, ‘Semantische und Konzeptuelle Repräsentation Lexikalischer Einheiten’, in R. Ruzicka and W. Motsch (eds.), Studia Grammatika 22, 61–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch, Manfred: 1989, ‘Event Nominalizations. Proposals and Problems’, Linguistische Studien, Reihe A 194, Akademie Verlag, pp. 1–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi: 1988, Psych-verbs and Θ-theory’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 291–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Maria: 1994, ‘Crosslinguistic Semantics’, Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 53–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit: 1984, ‘The Projection Principle and Rules of Morphology’, in Charles Jones and Peter Sells (eds.), The Proceedings of NELS 14, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 16–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit: 1990a, ‘Derived Nominals and the Causative-Inchoative Alternation: Two Case Studies in Parallel Morphology’, unpublished, University of California, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit: 1990b, ‘V+ing: It Walks like an Adjective, It Talks like an Adjective’, Linguistic Inquiry 21, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit: 1991, ‘The Causative-Inchoative Alternation: A Case Study in Parallel Morphology’, The Linguistic Review 8, 119–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, John: 1990, ‘A Structural Theory of Predication’, unpublished, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, John: 1991, ‘The Syntax and Semantics of Nominals’, in Steven Moore and Adam Zachary Wyner (eds.), Proceedings from SALT 1. Cornell University Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, John: 1993, ‘The Syntax of Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 24, 591–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan: 1982, ‘The Passive in Lexical Theory’, in Joan Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugmann, Karl and Albert Thumb: 1913, Griechische Grammatik. Lautlehre, Stammbildungs und Flexionslehre, Syntax, Handbuch der klassischen Altertums-Wissenschaft, 4th C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1967, ‘Comments on Donald Davidson’s ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in Nicholas Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 104–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1991, ‘Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation’, in Robert Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1992, ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Christopher Thad: 1993, Topics in Ewe Syntax, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, Max J.: 1973, Logics and Languages, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: 1967, ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in Nicholas Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1989, ‘On the Semantic Content of the Notion of ‘Thematic Role’’, in Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara H. Partee and Raymond Turner (eds.), Properties, Types and Meaning. Volume II: Semantic Issues, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1991, ‘Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection’, Language 67, 547–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanselow, Gisbert: 1991, Minimale Syntax, Volume 32, Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik. Germanistisch Instituut, Reijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, Charles J.: 1968, ‘The Case for Case’, in Emmon Bach and Robert Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1990, Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.: 1991, ‘Extended Projection’, unpublished, Brandeis University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane and Armin Mester: 1988, ‘Light Verbs and Q-Marking’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 205–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane and Elisabeth Selkirk: 1976, ‘Infinitival Noun Phrases in Italian’, unpublished, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, Jeffrey S.: 1965, Studies in Lexical Relations, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Kenneth and Samuel J. Keyser: 1987, ‘A View form the Middle’, Lexicon Project Working Papers, 7, Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Kenneth and Samuel J. Keyser: 1992, ‘On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations’, unpublished, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazout, Ilan: 1990, Verbal Nouns: Theta-Theoretic Studies in Hebrew and Arabic, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene and Angelika Kratzer: forthcoming, Semantics in Generative Grammar, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James: 1985, ‘On Semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhle, Tilman N.: 1976, ‘Die Aktiv-Passiv Relation im Deutschen. Grundlagen einer lexikalistischen Syntaxtheorie’, unpublished, Universität Köln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhle, Tilman N.: 1982, ‘Über Komposition und Derivation’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 1, 76–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, Henrietta J.: 1988, ‘The Structure of Derived Nouns and Verbs in Malagasy: A Syntactic Account’, unpublished, McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1977, X’ Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, Henrietta J.: 1983, Semantics and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, Henrietta J.: 1990, Semantic Structures, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggli, Osvaldo: 1986, ‘Passive’, Linguistic Inquiry 17, 587–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggli, Osvaldo and Nina Hyams: 1989, ‘On the Independence and Interdependence of Syntactic and Morphological Properties: English Aspectual Come and Go’, unpublished, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, Otto: 1927, A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part III (Syntax), Ejnar Munksggard, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, Otto: 1940, A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part V (Syntax), Ejnar Munksggard, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Kyle: 1991, ‘Object Positions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 577–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Brian and Jane C. Smirniotopoulos: 1993, ‘The Morphosyntax of the Modern Greek Verb as Morphology and not Syntax’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 388–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Ewan and Ivan Sag: 1985, ‘Type Driven Translation’, Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 163–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika: forthcoming, The Event Argument and the Semantics of Voice, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Richard K.: 1988, ‘On the Double Object Construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeaux, David: 1984, ‘Nominalizations, Argument Structure, and the Organization of the Grammar’, unpublished, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeaux, David: 1986, ‘The Interpretation of Derived Nominals’, in A. M. Farley, P. T. Farley and K. E. McCullogh (eds.), CLS 22: Papers from the General Session at the Twenty-Second Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, University of Chicago, Chicago, pp. 231–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: 1972, ‘General Semantics’, in Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 169–218.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, Alec: 1984, On the Nature of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Robert: 1977, The Grammar of Quantification, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Robert: 1985, Logical Form. Its Structure and Derivation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Erika: 1991, ‘Case and the Finnish Object’, in Almeida J. Toribio and Wayne E. Harbert (eds.), Cornell University Working Papers in Linguistics 9, 193–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, Richard: 1974, Formal Philosophy, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Terence: 1980, ‘Modifiers and Quantifiers in Natural Language’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Suppl. Vol. 6, 29–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Terence: 1985, ‘Underlying Events in the Logical Analysis of English’, in Ernest LePore and Brian McLaughlin (eds.), Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Terence: 1990, Events in the Semantics of Engl ish. A Study in Subatomic Semantics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Terence: 1993, ‘Thematic Relations and Arguments’, unpublished, University of California, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David: 1989, ‘Language-Particular Processes and the Earliness Principle’, unpublished, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David: 1995, Zero Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portner, Paul: 1992, Situation Theory and the Semantics of Propositional Expressions, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, Malka and Beth Levin: 1986, ‘What to Do with Theta-Roles’, Lexicon Project Working Papers 11, Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, Maria-Luisa: 1990, ‘The Location of Non-Active Voice in Albanian and Modern Greek’, Linguistic Inquiry 21, 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, Maria-Luisa: 1992, ‘Adverb Incorporation and the Syntax of Adverbs in Modern Greek’, Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 289–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian G.: The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, Thomas and Muffy E. Siegel: 1978, ‘A Lexical Transformation for Verbal Compounds’, Linguistic Inquiry 9, 199–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönfinkel, Moses: 1924, ‘Über die Bausteine der mathematischen Logik’, Mathematische Annalen 92, 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Carlota S.: 1991, The Parameter of Aspect, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Speas, Margaret J.: 1990, Phrase Structure in Natural Language, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stechow, Arnim von: 1991, ‘Syntax und Semantik’, in Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik/Semantics. Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung/An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 90–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin: 1980, ‘Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 203–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin: 1981a, ‘Argument Structure and Morphology’, The Linguistic Review 1, 81–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin: 1981b, ‘On the Notions ‘Lexically Related’ and ‘Head of a Word’’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 245–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa: 1985, ‘The Relation between Morphophonology and Morphosyntax: The Case of Romance Causatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 247–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa: 1987, Levels of Representation in the Lexicon and in the Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucchi, Alessandro: 1988, The Language of Propositions and Events. Issues in the Syntax and Semantics of Nominalization, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the External Argument from its Verb. In: Rooryck, J., Zaring, L. (eds) Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4621-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8617-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics