Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Environment, Science and Society ((ENSS,volume 2))

Abstract

One of the central themes in the field of environmental economics has been the valuation of environmental amenities, usually within the framework of benefit cost analysis (BCA) or natural resource damage assessment. Much of the research associated with BCA has sought to expand the types of benefits that can be quantified and measured in money terms. The result has been a broadened interpretation of the norms of conventional BCA (i.e. the dual assumptions of individual utility maximization from consumption and the expression of value through market transactions). With these advances, there has been a progressive movement of commodities from the set without measures (usually designated as intangibles) to the set with measures. For example, recreational services associated with water resource projects, were regarded as intangible until the development of the travel cost method (TCM) for estimating the demand for outdoor recreation sites (Clawson and Knetsch, 1966; Desvouges et al., 1983; McConnell, 1985). Currently, attention has been focused on one major category of intangibles in BCA: nonuse values (NUV) associated with natural environmental resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreoni, J. (1989) Giving with impure altruism: applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence, Journal Political Economy 97 (61), 1447–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. and Fisher, A. C. (1974) Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibility, Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, 313–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T. C., Blume, L., and Varian, H. (1986) On the private provision of public goods, Journal of Public Economics 29, 789–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop R. C. (1982) Option value: An exposition and extension, Land Economics 58 (1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, K. J. and Bishop, R. C. (1987) Valuing wildlife in benefit cost analysis: A case study involving endangered species, Water Resources Research 23, 943–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, T. A. and Englin, J. (1990) Existence, option and user demands for non-market resources, Department of Economics, UCLA/Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, M. and Knetsch, J. L. (1966) Economics of Outdoor Recreation. John Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, R. G. and Harrison, G. W. (1992) Identifying and measuring nonuse values for natural and environmental resources: A critical review of the state of the art, Final Report to the American Petroleum Institute, Department of Economics, University of New Mexico, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desvousges, W. H., Smith, V. K., and McGivney, M. P. (1983) A Comparison of Alternative Approaches for Estimating Recreation and Related Benefits of Water Quality Improvements, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. C. and Hanemann, W. M. (1987) Quasi-option value: Some misconceptions dispelled, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14 (2), 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. and Raucher, R. (1984) Intrinsic benefits of improved water quality: Conceptual and empirical perspectives, in V. K. Smith and A. Dryden Witte (eds.), Advances in Applied Microenconomics, JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman III, M. A. (1979) The Benefits of Environmental Improvement: Theory and Practice, Resources for the Future, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman III, M. A. (1990) Non-use values in natural resource damage assessment, Resources for the Future/Bowdoin College, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoevenagel, R. (1994) An assessment of the contingent valuation method (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, P.-O. (1987) The Economic Theory and Measurement of Environmental Benefits, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, P.-O. (1994) Valuation and aggregation (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. R. (1991) Measuring existence values: Environmental altruism and the missing behavioral link, Research Triangle Institute/U.S. Naval Academy, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, R. J. (1991) The proper role of existence value in public decision making, Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper QE91–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutilla, J. V. (1967) Conservation reconsidered, American Economic Review 57 (4), 777–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehman, E. (1991) Alternative measures of benefit for non-market goods which are substitutes for market goods, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. F. (1967) Collective consumption services of individual consumption goods: Comment, Quarterly Journal of Economics 81 (May), 351–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madriaga, B. and McConnell, K. E. (1987) Exploring existence value, Water Resources Research 23 (5), 936–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäler, K.-G. (1974) Environmental Economics: A Theoretical Inquiry, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäler, K.-G. (1989) Valuation of costs and benefits from resource use, The World Bank, Washington, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäler, K.-G. (1992) Private correspondence.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, K. E. (1983) Existence and bequest value, in R. D. Rowe and L. G. Chestnut (eds.), Managing Air Quality and Scenic Resources at National Parks and Wilderness Areas, Westview Press, Boulder, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, K. E. (1985) The economics of outdoor recreation in A. V. Kneese and J. L. Sweeney (eds.), Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. R. (1992) Is sympathy an economic value? Philosophy, economics and the contingent valuation method, Department of Economics, Stanford University, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. C. and Carson, R. T. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. G. (1982) Environmental ethics and nonhuman rights, Environmental Ethics 4, 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W. and Markandya, A. (1989) The Benefits of Environmental Policy, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W. and Turner, V. K. (1990) Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment, Harvester, Wheatsheaf, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (1991) A research program for a critique of total valuation, University of Maryland/Australian National University, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, A. (1991) Total and non-use values, in J. B. Braden and C. D. Kolstad (eds.), Measuring Demand for Environmental Quality, Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, A. and Stoll, J. R. (1983) Existence value in a total valuation framework, in R. D. Rowe and L. G. Chestnut (eds.), Managing Air Quality and Scenic Resources at National Parks and Wilderness Areas, Westview Press, Boulder, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1980) Unpopular Essays on Technical Progress. University of Pittsburg Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. D. (1984) A positive model of private charity and public transfers, Journal of Political Economy 92 (February), 136–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. H. and Nelson, R. H. (1992) Why existence value should not be used in cost—benefit analysis, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 11 (1), 116–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff, M. (1980) On the preservation of species, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 7, 33–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shechter, M. (1991) A comparative study of environmental amenity valuations, Environmental and Resource Economics 1 (2), 129–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shechter, M. and Kim, M. (1991) Valuation of pollution abatement benefits: Direct and indirect measurement. Journal of Urban Economics 30, 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. D., Brookshire, D. S., Walther, E. G., McFarland, K. K., Thayer, M. A., Whitworth, R. L., Ben-David, S., Malm, W., and Molenar, J. (1983) The economic benefits of preserving visibility in the National Parklands of the Southwest, Natural Resources Journal 23, 149–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. D., d’Arge, R. C., Brookshire, D. S. (1981) Valuing environmental commodities: Some recent experiments, Land Economics 57 (2), 151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K. (1987a) Non-use value in benefit—cost analysis and the treatment of option value, Southern Economic Journal, 54 (1), 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K. (1987b) Uncertainty, benefit—cost analysis, and the treatment of option value, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14 (3), 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K. (1991) Household production functions and environmental benefit estimation, in J. B. Braden and C. D. Kolstad (eds.), Measuring Demand for Environmental Quality, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K. (1992) Private correspondence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudgen, R. (1984) Reciprocity: The supply of public goods through voluntary contributions, Economic Journal 94, 772–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svento, R. (1994) Welfare measurement under uncertainty, (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Veer, D. and Pierce, C. (1986) People, Penguins, and Plastic Trees: Basic Issues in Environmental Ethics, Wadsworth, Belmont, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R. G., Sanders, L. D., and Loomis, J. B. (1985) Wild and Scenic River Economics: Recreation Use and Preservation Values, American Wilderness Alliance, Englewood, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (1964) Collective consumption services of individual consumption goods, Quarterly Journal of Economics 78, 471–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M. and Shechter, M. (1988) Psychological responses towards air pollution: Some personality and demographic correlates, Journal of Environmental Psychology 8, 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Rüdiger Pethig

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shechter, M., Freeman, S. (1994). Nonuse Value: Reflections on the Definition and Measurement. In: Pethig, R. (eds) Valuing the Environment: Methodological and Measurement Issues. Environment, Science and Society, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8317-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8317-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4345-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8317-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics