Skip to main content

Categories and Analogies

  • Chapter
Analogical Reasoning

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 197))

Abstract

I want to pursue the following claims:

  • The way we categorize helps explain the way we recognize a statement as an analogy.

  • Conversely, the way we recognize a statement as an analogy illuminates the way we categorize.

  • Analogies exist because of the way we categorize.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bobrow, D. G. and Winograd, T. (1977), ‘An overview of KRL: A knowledge representation language’. Cognitive Scienc. , 3–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M., Dull, V., and Lui, L. (1981), ‘Perceptions of the elderly: Stereotypes as prototvpes’, Journal of Personalitv and Social Psychologg. 4., 656–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, Kathleen (1985), ‘The cognitive structure of social categories’, Cognitive Scienc. , 3, 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, B. and Russell, J. A. (1984), ‘Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective’, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Genera. 11., 484–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, Charles J. (1968), ‘The case for case’, in Universals in Linguistic Theor., ed. Robert T. Harms, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, Dedre (1983), ‘Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy’, Cognitive Scienc. , 2, 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Gordon, S. E., and Sawyer, J. (1979), ‘Recognition memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memor. , 503–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975), ‘Logic and conversation’, in Syntax and Semantics, Vol. III: Speech Acts. ed. J. L. Morgan. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. and Fodor, J. A. (1963), ‘The structure of a semantic theory’, Languag. 3., 170–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Jerrold J. and Postal, Paul M. (1964), An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Description., Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George (1987), Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Min., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, Marvin (1975), ‘A framework for representing knowledge’, in The Psychology of Computer Visio., ed. P. Winston, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quillian, M. Ross (1968), ‘Semantic memory’, in Semantic Information Processin., ed. Marvin Minsky, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, Eleanor (1975a), ‘Cognitive reference points’, Cognitive Psycholog. , 532–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, Eleanor (1975b), ‘Cognitive representations of semantic categories’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Genera. 10., 192–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, Eleanor (1977), ‘Human categorization’, in Advances in Cross-Cultural Psycholog., New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1978), ‘Principles of categorization’, in Cognition and categorizatio., ed. B. B. Lloyd, Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, Eleanor (1981), ‘Categorization of natural objects’, Annual Review of Psycholog. 3., 89–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, Eleanor (In press), ‘Coherences and categorization: A historical view’, in Festschrift for Roger Brow., ed. E. Rosch, Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch E. and Mervis, C. B. (1975), ‘Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories’, Cognitive Psycholog. , 573–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, Roger C. and Abelson, R. (1977), Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understandin., Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1975), Conceptuallnformation Processin., New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1973), ‘Identification of conceptualizations underlying natural language’, in Computer Models of Thought and Languag., ed. K. M. Colby, San Francisco CA: Freeman, pp. 187–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. E. and Medin, D. L. (1981), Categories and Concept., Cambridge MA: Harvard U Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Turner, M. (1988). Categories and Analogies. In: Helman, D.H. (eds) Analogical Reasoning. Synthese Library, vol 197. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7811-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7811-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8450-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7811-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics