Skip to main content

A Fitting Theory of Truth

  • Chapter
The Problem of Truth

Part of the book series: Tulane Studies in Philosophy ((TUSP,volume 14))

Abstract

Philosophy should never lose sight of the distinction between the realm of experience and the realm of discourse. Discourse is first of all about experience, but since discourse is also a proper part of experience, it may be about itself and be self-referential or reflexive. This reflexivity affords no reason for becoming confused about the distinction, however. Discourse is that highly specialized area of experience wherein concepts or meanings are related to each other and also to those parts of experience which are not discursive. The relatedness of concepts is definitive of discourse. Experience is whatever any center of sensitivity undergoes, but the undergoing is not passive. Experience is action — that special kind of action called transaction. I shall call that area of experience outside the realm of discourse ‘concrete experience’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alfred Tarski, “The Semantic Conception of Truth” in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. IV (1943–44), PP. 341–375. His longer and more technical article (written earlier) is translated under the title “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages,” in his Logic, Semantics, Mathematics, ( Oxford, 1956 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Semantic Conception of Truth“, p. 366.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 361.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sovereign Reason, (Glencoe, Ill., 1954 ), P. 340.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Of Induction With Especial Reference to Mr. J. Stuart Mill’s System of Logic, ( London, 1849 ), P. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., P. 34

    Google Scholar 

  7. Judgment and Reasoning in the Child, (Paterson, N. J., 1959 ), P. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Translated under the title “Continuity and Irrational Numbers” in Essays on the Theory of Numbers,(LaSalle, Ill., 1948). W. W. Beman, translator.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For a fuller treatment of veridical perception, see my article “Perception and Epistemology” in Tulane Studies in Philosophy, Vol. XIII (1964), especially at pages 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1965 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, H.N. (1965). A Fitting Theory of Truth. In: The Problem of Truth. Tulane Studies in Philosophy, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7640-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7640-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-0288-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-7640-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics