Skip to main content

Maximum Entropy (Maxent) Method in Expert Systems and Intelligent Control: New Possibilities and Limitations

  • Conference paper
Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 79))

Abstract

To describe uncertainty of experts’ statements E1,…, En that form a knowledge base, it is natural to use (subjective) probabilities pi. Correspondingly, it is natural to use probabilities to describe uncertainty of the system’s answer to a given query Q. Since it is impossible to inquire about the expert’s probabilities for all possible (≥ 2n) propositional combinations of Ei i, a knowledge base is usually incomplete in the sense that there are many probability distributions consistent with this knowledge. If we want to return a single probability, we must select one of these distributions. MaxEnt is a natural selection rule, but for expert systems, computing the MaxEnt distribution often takes an unrealistically long time. In this paper, we propose computationally feasible approximate MaxEnt techniques for expert systems and intelligent control.

The authors are thankful to Peter C. Cheeseman for his interest and encouragement, and to all the participants of the workshop, especially to Professor Myron Tribus, for helpful discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Cheeseman, “In Defense of Probability”, in Proceedings of the 8-th International Joint Conference on AI, pp. 1002–1009, Los Angeles, CA, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Y. Dantsin and V. Kreinovich, “Probabilistic inference in prediction systems,” Soviet Mathematics Doklady, 1990, 40(1), pp. 8–12, 1990.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Elkan, “The paradoxical success of fuzzy logic”, in Proceedings of AAAI-93, American Association for Artificial Intelligence 1993 Conference, pp. 698–703.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. J. Klir and Bo Yuan, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Prentice Hall, NJ, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. L. J. Kohout and W. Bandler, “Fuzzy Interval Inference Utilizing the Checklist Paradigm and BK-Relational Products”, pp. 289–334, in R. B. Kearfott and V. Kreinovich, eds., Applications of Interval Computations, Kluwer, Boston, MA, 1995 (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. Kreinovich, “Group-theoretic approach to intractable problems,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 417, pp. 112–121, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. Kreinovich et al., “Monte-Carlo methods make Dempster-Shafer formalism feasible,” in Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, R. R. Yager et al., eds., pp. 175–191, Wiley, N.Y., 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Kreinovich and S. Kumar. “Optimal choice of &-and V-operations for expert values,” in Proceedings of the 3rd University of New Brunswick Artificial Intelligence Workshop, pp. 169–178, Fredericton, N.B., Canada, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Kreinovich et al., “What non-linearity to choose? Mathematical foundations of fuzzy control”, in Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Intelligent Control, Louisville, KY, 1992, pp. 349–412.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. T. Nguyen and E. A. Walker, “On decision making using belief functions”, in Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, R. R. Yager, J. Kacprzyk, and M. Pedrizzi, eds., pp. 311–330, Wiley, N.Y., 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Pearl, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Ramer and V. Kreinovich, “Maximum entropy approach to fuzzy control”, Information Sciences, 81(3-4), pp. 235–260, 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Ramer and V. Kreinovich, “Information complexity and fuzzy control”, in Fuzzy Control Systems, A. Kandel and G. Langholtz, eds., pp. 75–97, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. H. Smith and V. Kreinovich. “Optimal strategy of switching reasoning methods in fuzzy control”, in Theoretical aspects of fuzzy control, H. T. Nguyen, M. Sugeno, R. Tong, and R. Yager, eds., pp. 117–146, J. Wiley, N.Y., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kreinovich, V., Nguyen, H.T., Walker, E.A. (1996). Maximum Entropy (Maxent) Method in Expert Systems and Intelligent Control: New Possibilities and Limitations. In: Hanson, K.M., Silver, R.N. (eds) Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 79. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5430-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5430-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6284-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5430-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics