Skip to main content

Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure

  • Chapter
Elements of Grammar

Part of the book series: Kluwer International Handbooks of Linguistics ((KIHL))

Abstract

One central task for any theory of grammar is to solve the so-called “linking problem”: the problem of discovering regularities in how the participants of an event are expressed in surface grammatical forms and explaining those regularities.

Research for this article was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, grant 410-95-0979, and by FCAR of Quebec, grant 94ERA0578. I have had the opportunity to discuss various issues in this article in a syntax seminar at McGill University and in colloquium talks at the University of Pennsylvania, USC, and the University of California-Irvine. In addition, I have benefited from discussing these issues with Lisa Travis, Nigel Duffield, O. T. Stewart, Miwako Uesako, Hironobu Hosoi, Mika Kizu, and Jim McGilvary. I thank all these people and groups for their valuable input.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aissen, Judith (1987) Tzotzil Clause Structure. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsina, Alex and Sam Mchombo (1988) ‘Lexical mapping in the Chichewa applicative construction’, in 19th Annual African Linguistics Conference. Boston University, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Stephen (1976) ‘On the notion of subject in ergative languages’, in: Charles Li (ed.), Subject and Topic. Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, Joseph and Audrey Li (1989) ‘Scope and constituency’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 141–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, Joseph and Yen-hui Audrey Li (1993) Syntax of Scope. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark (1985) Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark (1988a) Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark (1988b) ‘Theta theory and the syntax of applicatives in Chichewa’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 353–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark (1989) ‘Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions’. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 513–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark (1991) ‘On some subject/object non-asymmetries in Mohawk’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 537–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark (1992a) ‘Thematic conditions on syntactic structures: Evidence from locative applicatives’, in: I. M. Rocca (ed.), Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar. Foris, Berlin, pp. 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark (1992b) ‘Unmatched chains and the representation of plural pronouns’, Natural Language Semantics 1, 33–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark (1992c) ‘Why unaccusative verbs cannot dative-shift’, in NELS. University of Massachusetts-Amherst, University of Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark (1995a) ‘On the structural positions of themes and goals’, in: Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zauring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark (1995b) The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson and Ian Roberts (1989) ‘Passive arguments raised’. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 219–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barss, Andrew (1986) Chains and Anaphoric Dependence: On Reconstruction and Its Implications. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barss, Andrew and Howard Lasnik (1986) ‘A note on anaphora and double objects’, Linguistic Inquiry 17, 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi (1981) ‘The syntax of ne: some theoretical implications’, The Linguistic Review 1, 117–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi (1988) ‘Psych-verbs and θ-theory’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 291–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Maria (1994) Case, Scope, and Binding. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Maria and Kenneth Hale (1996) ‘Ergativity: towards a theory of a heterogeneous class’, Linguistic Inquiry 27, 531–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok-Bennema, Reineke (1991) Case and Agreement in Inuit. Foris, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit (1984) Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit (1995) ‘Passive without theta grids’, ms., University of Massachusetts-Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan (1982) ‘Control and complementation’, in: Joan Bresnan (ed.). The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 282–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan and Joni Kanerva (1989) ‘Locative inversion in Chichewa: A case study of factorization in grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan and Lioba Moshi (1990) ‘Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax’, Linguistic Inquiry 21, 147–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burzio, Luigi (1986) Italian syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campana, Mark (1992) A Movement Theory of Ergativity. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro, Adriana (1992) On Free Word Order in Mohawk. M.A. thesis, McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1970) ‘Remarks on nominalization’, in: R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.). Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Ginn, Waltham, Mass., pp. 184–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1986) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1993) ‘A minimalist program for linguistic theory’, in: Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.). The View from Building 20. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1994) Bare Phrase Structure, ms., MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1995) The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik (1993) ‘The theory of principles and parameters’, in: Joachim Jacobs, Amim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, and Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 506–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Chris and Höskuldur Thráinsson (1996) ‘Object shift in double object constructions and the theory of case’, Linguistic Inquiry 27, 391–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, Bernard (1982) ‘Grammatical relations in Huichol’, in: Paul Hopper and Sandra Thompson (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 15: Studies in Transitivity. Academic Press, New York, pp. 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Edwin Williams (1987) On the Definition of Word. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. M. W. (1972) The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. M. W. (1979) ‘Ergativity’, Language 55, 59–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. M. W. (1994) Ergativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David (1979) Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David (1991) ‘Thematic proto-roles and argument selection’, Language 67, 547–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryer, Matthew (1987) ‘On primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative’. Language 62, 808–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, Joseph (1985) A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everaert, Martin (1990) ‘NP-movement “across” secondary objects’, in: Joan Mascaro and Marina Nespor (eds.), Grammar in Progress. Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 125–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, Charles (1968) ‘The case for Case’, in: Emond Bach and R. T. Harms (eds.), Universais in Linguistic Theory. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, pp. 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, William and Robert Van Valin (1984) Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. (1970) ‘Some remarks on the action nominalization in English’, in: R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.). Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Ginn, Waltham, Mass., pp. 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos, Carol (1987) ‘Psych nouns’, in: Joyce McDonough and Bernadette Plunkett (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 17. Graduate Linguistics Student Association, Amherst, Mass., pp. 211–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Georgia (1974) Semantics and Syntactic Regularity. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Ind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane (1990) Argument Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gropen, Jess, Steven Pinker, M. Hollander, R. Goldberg and R. Wilson (1989) ‘The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation’, Language 65, 203–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilfoyle, Eithne, Henrietta Hung and Lisa Travis (1992) ‘Spec of IP and Spec of VP: Two subjects in Austronesian languages’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10, 375–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Kenneth (1983) ‘Warlpiri and the grammar of nonconfigurational languages’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 5–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Kenneth and Samuel Jay Keyser (1993) ‘On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations’, in: Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.). The View from Building 20. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 53–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz (1993) ‘Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection’, in: Kenneth Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.). The View From Building 20. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 111–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoji, H. (1985) Logical Form Constraints and Confìgurational Structures in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, Norbert (1995) Logical Form: From GB to Minimalism. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray (1972) Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray (1983) Semantics and Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray (1987) ‘The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory’. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 369–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray (1990a) ‘On Larson’s treatment of the double object construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 21, 427–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray (1990b) Semantic Structures. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, Eloise (1984) ‘Empty categories, case, and configurationality’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2, 39–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, Alana (1984) ‘Dative “movement” in Eskimo’, in: D. Testen, V. Mishra and J. Drogo (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, Alana (1992) ‘Deriving ergativity’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 57–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle (1993) From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard (1984) Connectedness and Binary Branching. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul (1987) Morphology and Grammatical Relations, ms., Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Richard (1988) ‘On the double object construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Richard (1990) ‘Double objects revisited: A reply to Jackendoff’, Linguistic Inquiry 21, 589–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Beth (1983) On the Nature of Ergativity. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Beth (1993) English Verb Classes and Alternations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport (1986) ‘The formation of adjectival passives’. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 623–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport-Hovav (1995) Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Yafei (1990) ‘On V-V compounds in Chinese’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 177–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machobane, Malillo (1989) Some Restrictions on the Sesotho Transitivizing Morphemes. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, Anoop (1990) The A/A’ Distinction and Movement Theory. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, Alec (1984) On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, William (1994) Syntactic Projections of the Semantics of Aspect. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, G. R (1975) Remharnga: A Language of Central Arnhem Land. Ph.D. dissertation, Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithun, Marianne (1984) ‘How to avoid subordination’, in Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 493–509. Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagawa, S. (1989) Syntax and Semantics 22: Structure and Case Marking in Japanese. Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murasugi, Kumiko (1992) NP-movement and the Ergative Parameter. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Masanori (1993) ‘An economy account of wh-extraction in Tagalog’, in: Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI, Stanford, Calif., 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedjalkov, V. P. (1976) ‘Diathesen und satzstruktur im Tschuktschischen’, in: Ronald Lötsch and Rudolf Ruzicka (eds.), Satzstruktur und genus verbi. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp. 181–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oerhle, Richard (1975) The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, David (1978) ‘Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis’, in Papers from the Fifth Annual Meeting of The Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David (1987) ‘Binding problems with experiencer verbs’. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 126–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David (1995) Zero Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, Stephen (1989) Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, Paul (1979) Some Syntactic Rules of Mohawk. Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, Malka (1983) ‘On the nature of derived nominais’, in: Lori Levin, Malka Rappaport and Anne Zaenen (eds.). Papers in Lexical Functional Grammar. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Ind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, Malka and Beth Levin (1985) ‘A case study in lexical analysis: The locative alternation’, ms., MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, Malka and Beth Levin (1988) ‘What to do with θ-roles’, in: Wendy Wilkins (ed.). Syntax and Semantics 21: Thematic Relations. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., pp. 7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, Tom and M. E. A. Siegel (1978) ‘A lexical transformation for verbal compounds’, Linguistic Inquiry 9, 199–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Carol (1984) ‘The interface between semantic roles and initial grammatical relations’, in: David Perlmutter and Carol Rosen (eds.). Studies in Relational Grammar 2. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 38–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, Mamoru (1985) Some Asymmetries in Japanese and Their Theoretical Implications. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, Mamoru (1992) ‘Long distance scrambling in Japanese’, Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 69–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth (1982) The Syntax of Words. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Jane (1991) Warlpiri Morpho-Syntax: A Lexicalist Approach. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Jane and Joan Bresnan (1983) ‘Control and obviation in Warlpiri’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speas, Margaret (1990) Phrase Structure in Natural Language. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproat, Richard (1985) On Deriving the Lexicon. Ph.D dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, Timothy (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, Leonard (1985) ‘Lexicalization patterns’, in: Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 57–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenny, Carol (1987) Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenny, Carol (1994) Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, Lisa (1991) ‘Inner aspect and the structure of VP’, in NELS 22. Newark, Delaware, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valin, Robert (1987) ‘The Unaccusative Hypothesis versus lexical semantics: syntactic vs semantic approaches to verb classification’, in: Joyce McDonough and Bernadette Plunkett (eds.). Proceedings of NELS. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, GSLA, pp. 641–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valin, Robert (1990) ‘Semantic parameters of split intransitivity’, Language 66, 221–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasow, Thomas (1977) ‘Transformations and the Lexicon’, in: Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow and Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax. Academic Press, New York, pp. 327–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webelhuth, Gert (1992) Principles and Parameters of Syntactic Saturation. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin (1980) ‘Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 203–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaenen, Anne (1993) ‘Unaccusativity in Dutch: integrating syntax and lexical semantics’, in: James Pustejovsky (ed.), Semantics and the Lexicon. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 129–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zushi, Mihoko (1992) ‘The syntax of dative constructions in Japanese’, ms., McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Liliane Haegeman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baker, M.C. (1997). Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. In: Haegeman, L. (eds) Elements of Grammar. Kluwer International Handbooks of Linguistics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4298-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5420-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics