Abstract
As far as its teaching method is concerned, an educational institute can choose from several options, e.g., case studies, plenary lectures, distance learning, correspondence courses, work-shops or problem-based learning. The selection of a teaching method can be considered as the choice of the teaching institute’s production technology, and has therefore implications at both the strategic and operational level. The strategic implications include features of the product and structure of the organisation, while the operational implications pertain to the implementation of the teaching process and the quality control of the end product. According to the standard contingency theory in organisation sciences (Daft, 1992), there should be a fit between all the strategic and operational decisions in order to achieve good performance. This paper adopts contingency theory to develop a framework in order to answer the following question: How should an educational institute be organised — at the different levels — in order to facilitate the effectiveness of problem-based learning? So, although the issue of strategy formulation is discussed in passing to set the scene, the focus of the current paper is on the issue of strategy implementation, particularly through a number of elements of organisational design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Daft, R.L. (1992) Organization Theory and Design, West Publishing Company, New York, fourth edition.
Gijselaers, Wim H., Perspectives on Problem based Learning, in Gijselaers, Wim H.; Tempelaar, Dirk T.; Keizer, Piet K.; Blommaert, Jos M.; Bernard, Eugene M., and Kasper, Hans (eds.): Educational Innovation in Economics and Business Administration: The Case of Problem-based Learning, 39–52, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Johnson, G. and Scholes, K. (1993) Exploring Corporate Strategy, Prentice Hall, New York.
Leeuwen, A. van (1994) Universiteitentest, Elsevier, 29-10, 28–39.
Merchant, K. (1985) Control in Business Organizations, Pitmans Publishing, London.
Mintzberg, H.(1983) Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Moust, J.H.C.; Bouhuijs, P.A.J, and Schmidt, H.G. (1989) Probleemgestuurd leren [problem-based learning], Wolters Noordhoff, Groningen.
Porter, M.E. (1985) Competitive Advantage, The Free Press, New York.
Tempelaar, D. (1993) Handboek toetsconstructie [handbook test construction], Rijksuniversiteit Limburg, Maastricht.
Tempelaar, D. (1997) Congruence Of Assessment And Instructional System: The Case Of Problem-based Learning, This volume, Chapter #.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nijhuis, J., van Witteloostuijn, A. (1998). Teaching And Organising: The Case Of Problem-Based Learning. In: Tempelaar, D.T., Wiedersheim-Paul, F., Gunnarsson, E. (eds) Educational Innovation in Economics and Business II. Educational Innovation in Economics and Business, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5268-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5268-6_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6217-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5268-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive