Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Crustacean phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA

  • Chapter
Arthropod Relationships

Part of the book series: The Systematics Association Special Volume Series ((SASS,volume 55))

Abstract

Resolution concerning issues of higher-order crustacean phylogeny remains elusive even after years of thorough morphological and palaeontological scrutiny. Surprisingly, there is as yet no consensus regarding even the number of constituent crustacean classes. One view (Schram, 1986) based on a cladistic analysis of morphological characters suggests there are four classes: Remipedia, Phyllocarida, Maxillopoda and Malacostraca (Figure 14.1(a)); an alternative cladistic analysis (Brusca and Brusca, 1990) suggests there are five: Remipedia, Branchiopoda, Cephalocarida, Maxillopoda and Malacostraca (Figure 14.1(b)). Still another view (Bowman and Abele, 1982), presented as a classification rather than a phylogeny, divides crustaceans into six classes: the five aforementioned groups and the Ostracoda (Figure 14.1(c)).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abele, L.G., Kim, W. and Felgenhauer, B.E. (1989) Molecular evidence for inclusion of the phylum Pentastomida in the Crustacea. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 6, 685–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abele, L.G., Spears, T, Kim, W. and Applegate, M.A. (1992) Phylogeny of selected maxillopodan and other crustacean taxa based on 18S ribosomal nucleotide sequences: a preliminary analysis. Acta Zoologica, 73(5), 373–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adoutte, A. and Philippe, H. (1993) The major lines of metazoan evolution: summary of traditional evidence and lessons from ribosomal RNA sequence analysis, in Comparative Molecular Neurobiology (ed Y. Pichon), Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp. 1–30.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Akam, M., Averof, M., Castelli-Gair, J., Dawes, R., Falciani, F. and Ferrier, D. (1994) The evolving role of Hox genes in arthropods, in The Evolution of Developmental Mechanisms (eds M. Akam, P. Holland, P. Ingham and G. Wray), Company of Biologists, Cambridge, England, pp. 217–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D.T. (1973) Embryology and Phylogeny in Annelids and Arthropods, Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D.T. (1979) Embryos, fate maps, and the phylogeny of arthropods, in Arthropod Phylogeny (ed A. P. Gupta), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 59–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J.C. (1949) The systematic position of the genus Derocheilocaris and the status of the subclass Mystacocarida. American Museum Novitates, No. 1413, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, J.W.O., Olsen, G.J., Faith, D.P., Odgers, W.A., Rowell, D.M. and Atkinson, P.W. (1992) Evidence from 12S ribosomal RNA sequences that onychophorans are modified arthropods. Science, 258, 1345–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benevolenskaya, E.V., Kogan, G.L., Balakireva, M.D., Filipp, D., Arman, I.P. and Gvozdev, V.A. (1994) Analysis of pseudogene nucleotide sequence reveals variability of rDNA genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Russian Journal of Genetics, 30(3), 280–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström, J. (1980) Morphology and systematics of early arthropods. Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftichen Vereins in Hamburg, NF, 23, 7–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström, J. (1992) The oldest arthropods and the origin of the Crustacea. Acta Zoologica, 73(5), 287–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore, J.L., Collins, T.M., Stanton, D., Daehler, L.L. and Brown, W.M. (1995) Deducing the pattern of arthropod phylogeny from mitochondrial DNA arrangements. Nature, 376, 163–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, T.E. and Abele, L.G. (1982) Classification of the Recent Crustacea, in Systematics, the Fossil Record, and Biogeography (ed. L.G. Abele).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Biology of Crustacea, Vol. 1 (ed. D.E. Bliss), Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxshall, G.A. (1983) A comparative functional analysis of the major maxillopodan groups, in Crustacean Issues 1: Crustacean Phylogeny (ed. F.R. Schram), A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 121–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxshall, G.A. and Huys, R. (1989) New tantulocarid, Stygotantulus stocki, parasite on harpacticoid copepods, with an analysis of the phylogenetic relationships within the Maxillopoda. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 9, 126–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxshall, G.A. and Lincoln, R.I (1983) Tantulocarida, a new class of Crustacea ectoparasitic on other crustaceans. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 3, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, K. (1988) The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution, 42(4), 795–803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, K. (1994) Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics, 10, 295–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, D.E.G., Weedon, MJ. and Whyte, M.A. (1993) Arthropoda (Crustacea excluding Ostracoda), in The Fossil Record 2 (ed. M. J. Benton), Chapman & Hall, London, Chapter 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusca, R.C. and Brusca, G.J. (1990) Invertebrates, Sinauer, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cisne, J.L. (1974) Trilobites and the origin of arthropods. Science, 186, 13–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Claus, C. (1888) Ueber den Oganismus der Nebaliden und die systematische Stellung der Leptostraken. Arbeiten aus dem zoologischen Institute der Universität Wien und der zoologischen Station in Triest, 8, 1–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. (1952) Reports of the Lund University Chile Expedition 1948–1949. 7. Mystacocarida. Lunds Universitets Ã…rsskrift. N F. Avd. 2, 48(6), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. (1956) Some crustacean relationships, in Bertil Hanström, Zoological Papers in Honour of his Sixty-fifth Birthday (ed. K. G. Wingstrand), Zoological Institute, Lund, Sweden, pp. 138–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. (1983) Malacostracan phylogeny and evolution, in Crustacean Issues 1: Crustacean Phylogeny (ed. F. R. Schram), A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 189–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. (1987) Malacostraca maltreated — the case of the Phyllocarida. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 7(4), 721–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. (1992) Aspects of malacostracan evolution. Acta Zoologica, 73(5), 339–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Rijk, P., Neefs, J.-M., Van de Peer, Y. and De Wachter, R. (1992) Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Research, 20 (supplement), 2075–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dohle, W. and Scholtz, G (1988) Clonal analysis of the crustacean segment: discordance between genealogical and segmental borders. Development (supplement), 104, 147–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eernisse, D.J., Albert, J.S. and Anderson, F.E. (1992) Annelida and Arthropoda are not sister taxa: a phylogenetic analysis of spi-ralian metazoan morphology. Systematic Biology, 41(3), 305–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M.J. and Schram, F.R. (1990) The origin of crustacean biramous appendages and the evolution of the Arthropoda. Science, 250, 667–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J.S. (1989) The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics, 5, 417–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. (1978) Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology, 40, 366–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. (1985a) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. (1985b) Confidence limits on phylogenies with a molecular clock. Systematic Zoology, 34(2), 152–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. (1993) PHYLIP: Phylogeny inference package, version 3.5c. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, K.G, Olsen, G.J., Lane, D.J., Giovanni, S.J., Ghiselin, M.T., Raff, E.C., Pace, N.R. and Raff, R.A. (1988) Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science, 239, 748–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, M. and Tautz, D. (1995) Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myri-apods. Nature, 376, 165–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G. (1992) The origin of the Crustacea. Acta Zoologica, 73, 273–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G. (1996) Reflections on arthropod evolution. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 58, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.T. (1988) The origin of molluscs in light of molecular evidence. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 5, 66–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grygier, M.J. (1982) Sperm morphology in Ascothoracida (Crustacea: Maxillopoda): confirmation of generalized nature and phylogenetic importance. International Journal of Invertebrate Reproduction, 4, 323–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grygier, M.J. (1983) Ascothoracida and the unity of the Maxillopoda, in Crustacean Issues 1: Crustacean Phylogeny (ed. F. R. Schram), A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 73–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grygier, M. J. (1987) New records, external and internal anatomy, and systematic position of Hansen’s Y-larvae (Crustacea: Maxillopoda: Facetotecta). Sarsia, 72, 261–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessler, R.R. (1964) The Cephalocarida: comparative skeletomus-culature. Memoirs of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 16, 1–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessler, R.R. (1983) A defense of the caridoid facies; wherein the early evolution of the Eumalacostraca is discussed, in Crustacean Issues I: Crustacean Phylogeny (ed. F. R. Schram), A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 145–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessler, R.R. (1992) Reflections on the phylogenetic position of the Cephalocarida. Acta Zoologica, 73(5), 315–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessler, R.R. and Newman, WA. (1975) A trilobitomorph origin for the Crustacea. Fossils and Strata, 4, 437–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, D.M. and Huelsenbeck, J.P. (1992) Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Heredity, 83,189–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huelsenbeck, J.P., Bull, J.J. and Cunningham, C.W. (1996) Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11(4), 152–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Itô, T. (1989) Origin of the basis in copepod limbs, with reference to remipedian and cephalocarid limbs. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 9, 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, P.P. (1944) The primary and secondary metamery of the body. Zhurnal Obshchey Biologii, 5, 61–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, B.J.M. (1991) Ultrastructure and phylogeny of crustacean spermatozoa. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 31, 109–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A.G and Farris, J.S. (1969) Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Zoology, 18, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, JA. (1990) Origin of the Metazoa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 87, 763–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manton, S.M. (1934) On the embryology of the crustacean, Nebalia bipes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 223, 163–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manton, S.M. (1977) The Arthropoda: Habits, Functional Morphology, and Evolution, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.W., Vetter, E.W. and Cash-Clark, CE. (1996) Description, external morphology, and natural history observations of Nebalia hessleri, new species (Phyllocarida: Leptostraca), from southern California, with a key to the extant families and genera of the Leptostraca. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 16(2), 347–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne Edwards, H. (1834) Histoire naturelle des Crustacés comprenant l’anatomie, la physiologie et la classification de ces animaux, in Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Tome Premier, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, WA. (1992) Origin of Maxillopoda. Acta Zoologica, 73, 319–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panganiban, G., Sebring, A., Nagy, L. and Carroll, S. (1995) The development of crustacean limbs and the evolution of arthropods. Science, 270, 1363–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, N.H. (1994) The evolution of arthropod pattern formation: insights from comparisons of gene expression patterns, in The Evolution of Developmental Mechanisms (eds M. Akam, P. Holland, P. Ingham and G. Wray), Company of Biologists, Cambridge, England, pp. 217–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, N.H., Martin-Blanco, E., Coleman, K.G., Poole, S.J., Ellis, M.C., Kornberg, T.B. and Goodman, CS. (1989) Expression of engrailed proteins in arthropods, annelids, and chordates. Cell, 58, 955–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. (1989) Phylogenetic relations of major groups: conclusions and prospects, in The Hierarchy of Life (eds B. Fernholm, K. Bremer and H. Jörnvall), Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 471–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, H.F. (1979) Eye structure and the monophyly of the Arthropoda, in Arthropod Phylogeny (ed A. P. Gupta), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 299–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennak, R.W. and Zinn, D.J. (1943) Mystacocarida, a new order of Crustacea from intertidal beaches in Massachusetts and Connecticut. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 103(9), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raff, R.A., Marshall, CR. and Turbeville, J.M. (1994) Using DNA sequences to unravel the Cambrian radiation of the animal phyla. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 25, 351–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J., Banaja, A.A. and James, J.L. (1978) The phylogenetic relationships of the Pentastomida: the case for their inclusion within the Crustacea. Internationaljournal for Parasitology, 8, 245–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, H.L. (1957) The Cephalocarida and crustacean phylogeny. Systematic Zoology, 6(3), 112–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, H.L. (1963) The Cephalocarida: functional morphology, larval development, and comparative external anatomy. Memoirs of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 15, 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz, G, Patel, N.H. and Dohle, W. (1994) Serially homologous engrailed stripes are generated via different cell lineages in the germ band of amphipod crustaceans (Malacostraca, Peracarida). International Journal of Developmental Biology, 38, 471–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schram, F.R. (1986) Crustacea, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, F.R. and Emerson, M.J. (1991) Arthropod pattern theory: a new approach to arthropod phylogeny. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 31, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, F.R., Yager, J. and Emerson, MJ. (1986) Remipedia Part 1. Systematics. San Diego Society of Natural History Memoir, 15, 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siewing, R. (1960) Neuere Ergebnisse der Verwandschaftsforschung bei den Crustaceen. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Universitat Rostock, Mathematische-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe, 3, 343–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, T., Abele, L.G. and Applegate, M.A. (1994) Phylogenetic study of cirripedes and selected relatives (Thecostraca) based on 18S rDNA sequence analysis. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 14(4), 641–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starobogatov, Ya.I. (1986) Systematics of Crustacea. Zoologicheskiy Zhurnal, 65, 1769–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starobogatov, Ya.I. (1988) Systematics of Crustacea. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 8, 300–11. [English translation of Starobogatov (1986) by M. J. Gry gier, including additional notes by Starobogatov.]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, V. and Jamieson, B.G.M. (1992) Further spermatological evidence for including the Pentastomida (tongue worms) in the Crustacea. International Journal for Parasitology, 22(1), 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D.L. (1993) PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A. (1983) Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and apes. Evolution, 37, 221–444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. and Gibson, T.J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position spécifie gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22(22), 4673–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiegs, O.W. and Manton, S.M. (1958) The evolution of the Arthropoda. Biological Review, 33, 255–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turbeville, J.M., Pfeifer, D.M., Field, K.G. and Raff, R.A. (1991) The phylogenetic status of arthropods, as inferred from 18S rRNA sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 8, 669–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wägele, J.W. (1993) Rejection of the ‘Uniramia’ hypothesis and implication of the Mandibulata concept. Zoologische Jahrbucher (Systematik), 120, 253–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waggoner, B.M. (1996) Phylogenetic hypotheses of the relationships of arthropods to Precambrian and Cambrian problematic fossil taxa. Systematic Biology, 45(2), 190–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walossek, D. (1993) The Upper Cambrian Rehbachiella and the phylogeny of the Branchiopoda and Crustacea. Fossils and Strata, 32, 1–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walossek, D. and Müller, K.J. (1994) Pentastomid parasites from the Lower Palaeozoic of Sweden. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 85, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weygoldt, P. (1979) Significance of later embryonic stages and head development in arthropod phylogeny, in Arthropod Phylogeny (ed A.P. Gupta), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 107–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weygoldt, P. (1986) Arthropod interrelationships — the phyloge-netic-systematic approach. Zeitschrift fur Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, 24, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whatley, R.C., Siveter, D.J. and Boomer, I.D. (1993) Arthropoda (Crustacea: Ostracoda), in The Fossil Record 2 (ed. M. J. Benton), Chapman & Hall, London, Chapter 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, W.C. (1995) Sequence alignment, parameter sensitivity, and the phylogenetic analysis of molecular data. Systematic Biology, 44(3), 321–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, W.C, Cartwright, P. and Hayashi, C.Y. (1993) Arthropod phylogeny: a combined approach. Cladistics, 9, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, M.A., Briggs, D.E. and Fortey, R.A. (1994) Disparity as an evolutionary index: a comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods. Paleobiology, 20(2), 93–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G.D.F. (1992) Computerized analysis of crustacean relationships. Acta Zoologica, 73(5), 383–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingstrand, K.G. (1972) Comparative spermatology of a pentastomid, Raillietiella hemidactyli, and a branchiuran crustacean, Argulus foliaceous, with a discussion of pentastomid relationships. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Biologiske Skrifter, 19, 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, J. (1981) Remipedia, a new class of Crustacea from a marine cave in the Bahamas. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 1, 328–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zrzavý, J. and Å tys, P. (1994) Origin of the crustacean schizoramous limb: a re-analysis of the duplosegmentation hypothesis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 1, 743–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zrzavý, J. and Å tys, P. (1995) Evolution of metamerism in Arthropoda: developmental and morphological perspectives. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 70(3), 279–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-2043, USA

    T. Spears

  2. Office of the Provost, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-3020, USA

    L. G. Abele

Authors
  1. T. Spears
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. G. Abele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD, London, UK

    R. A. Fortey

  2. Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD, London, UK

    R. H. Thomas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spears, T., Abele, L.G. (1998). Crustacean phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA. In: Fortey, R.A., Thomas, R.H. (eds) Arthropod Relationships. The Systematics Association Special Volume Series, vol 55. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4904-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4904-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6057-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4904-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation