Abstract
Monopolization means changing industry structure to reduce competition. Preventing harm to competition is a worthy goal for antitrust policy, but a difficult one. Acts of competing themselves may affect industry structure and harm competitors. In many contexts it is quite difficult to reliably tell the difference between changes in industry structure because of monopolization vs. because of competition. These general guiding principles are familiar, but they apply with redoubled force in the computer industry. The computer industry has changed to new modes of competition which we do not yet fully understand. The determinants of computer industry structure offer very powerful forces for efficient concentration and excellent opportunities for monopolization at the same time. There are only rarely opportunities for public policy to influence industry structure, and neither the appropriate policy goal nor the appropriate policy instrument need be obvious at those moments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baldwin, C.A. and K.B. Clark, “Sun Wars,” in Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence, (Ed) D.B. Yoffie, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
Besen, S.M. and G. Saloner, “Compatibility Standards and the Market for Telecommunications Service,” in Changing the Rules: Technological Change, International Competition and Regulation in Telecommunications, (Eds.) R.W. Crandall and K. Flamm, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1989.
Besen, S., and Farrell, J., “Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization,” Journal of Economic Perspective, Volume 8(2), Spring 1994.
Brandenburger, A. and Nalebuff, B., Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday, 1996.
Breuhan, Andrea, “Innovation and the Persistence of Technological Lock-In”, Ph.D dissertation/ Master’s thesis, Department of Economics, Stanford University, 1997.
Bresnahan, T. and Shane Greenstein, “Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry”, Center for Economic Policy Research Publication No. 315, September 1992. Available at: http://timb.stanford.edu/papers/techcomp.pdf.
Bresnahan, T. and S.M. Greenstein, “Technical Progress and Co-Invention in Computing and in the Use of Computers,” Brookings Papers on Economics Activity: Microeconomics, 1997, pp. 1–78.
Bresnahan, T. and F. Malerba, “Industrial Dynamics and the Evolution of Firms’ and Nations’ Competitive Capabilities in the World Computer Industry,” mimeo, Stanford Computer Industry Project, 1997.
Bresnahan, T. and Garth Saloner (1996) “Large Firms’ Demand for Computer Products and Services: Competing Market Models, Inertia, and Enabling Strategic Change”, forthcoming in Colliding Worlds: The Merging of Computers, Telecommunications, and Consumer Electronics, David B. Yoffie (ed.), Harvard University Press.
David, P. A., “Narrow Windows, Blind Giants and Angry Orphans: The Dynamics of Systems Rivalries and Dilemmas of Technology Policy”, Technological Innovation Project Working Paper, No. 10, Center of Economic Policy Research, Stanford University. Paper presented to the Conference on Innovation Diffusion, held in Venice, Italy, March 17-22, 1986.
David, P.A. and S. Greenstein, “The Economics of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction to Recent Research,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 1, 1990.
Davidow, W.H., Marketing High Technology: An Insider’s View, New York: Free Press; London: Collier Macmillan, 1986.
DeLamarter, R.T., Big Blue: IBM’s Use and Abuse of Power, New York: Dodd, Mead, 1986.
Demsetz, Harold, “Two Systems of Belief about Monopoly”, reprinted in The Organization of Economic Activity: Volume 2, Efficiency, Competition, and Policy. Oxford and New York: Blackwell, 1989.
Farrell, J., H. Monroe and G. Saloner, “Systems Competition versus Component Competition: Order Statistics, Interface Standards, and Open Systems,” Stanford University, mimeo, July 1994.
Ferguson, C.H. and C.R, Morris, Computer Wars: How the West Can Win in a Post-IBM War, 1st ed., New York: Times Books: Random House, 1993.
Fisher, F.M., J.J. McGowan and J.E. Greenwood, Folded, Spindled, and Mutilated: Economic Analysis and U.S. vs. IBM, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1983.
Fisher, F.M., J.W. McKie and R.B. Mancke, IBM and the U.S. Data Processing Industry: An Economic History, New York: Praeger Publishers, 1993.
Greenstein, Shane, “Did Installed Base Give an Incumbent any (Measurable) Advantages in Federal Computer Procurement?”, RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 24(1), 1993.
Grove, A., Only the Paranoid Survive. New York: Currency Doubleday, 1996.
Katz, M. & Shapiro, C. “Antitrust in Software Markets”, this volume.
Steffens, J., Newgames: Strategic Competition in the PC Revolution, New York: Pergamon Press, 1994.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bresnahan, T.F. (1999). New Modes of Competition. In: Eisenach, J.A., Lenard, T.M. (eds) Competition, Innovation and the Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust in the Digital Marketplace. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4407-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4407-0_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5894-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4407-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive