Abstract
Previous studies on job satisfaction suggest that: women are more satisfied with their job than men, while workers with higher wages and workers with more education are less satisfied. In this paper we try to explain these somewhat puzzling and counterintuitive findings. Further, we examine the effects of the quality of the match between skills and job requirements on job satisfaction. We also explore the possibility that the atmosphere in which the work is done has an effect on job satisfaction. A novelty is the joint estimation of job satisfaction and wages, where job satisfaction is determined by the wage rate. This joint estimation allows us to indicate whether workers who are paid more than their expected market wage are more satisfied than workers who are underpaid relative to their expected market wage rate. It also enables us to separate the effect of variables on job satisfaction from their effect on wages.
The empirical results show that women are more satisfied with their job than men. The average job satisfaction of female dominated firms is higher than the job satisfaction among workers in male dominated firms. A decomposition analysis shows that women have both the characteristics and the behavioral responses that make them, on average, more satisfied with their job than men. Both absolute and relative wages have an effect on male job satisfaction, but not on female job satisfaction. Workers in jobs that require more education are more satisfied. The same holds for workers in jobs for which they are underqualified.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abramis, D. (1994). Work role ambiguity, job satisfaction, and job performance: meta-analysis and review, Psychological Reports, 75, p. 1411ā1433.
Clark, A. (1993). Job satisfaction and gender: why are women so happy at work, Discussion Paper 4, ESRC Research centre on micro-Social Change, University of Essex.
Clark, A. and.A. Oswald (1995). Satisfaction and comparison income, Paper presented at CEPR/ESRC University of Essex Workshop, London.
Groot, W. and H. Maassenvan den Brink (1997a). Allocation and the returns to over-education in the United Kingdom, Education Economics, 5, p. 169ā183.
Groot, W and H. Maassen van den Brink (1997b). Overeducation in the labor market: a meta-analysis, mimeo.
Mekkelholt, E. and J. Hartog (1989). Mobiliteit en beloning, OSA-Werkdocument W59, Den Haag.
Mekkelholt, E., E. Brouwer and W. Praat (1991). Arbeidsmobiliteit en beloning in Nederland, OSA Werkdocument W88, Den Haag.
Mekkelholt, E. (1993). Een sequentiƫle analyse van de baanmobiliteit in Nederland, PhD-thesis, Department of Economics, University of Amsterdam.
Taylor, M. Freed (ed.) (1992). British Household Panel Survey User Manual, Colchester, University of Essex.
Tsang, M. and H. Levin (1985). The economics of overeducation, Economics of Education Review 4, p. 93ā104.
Woittiez, I. and J. Theeuwes (1995). Well-being and labour market status, Research Memorandum 95.01, Department of Economics, Leiden University.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Groot, W., van den Brink, H.M. (2000). Job satisfaction, wages and allocation of men and women. In: Diener, E., Rahtz, D.R. (eds) Advances in Quality of Life Theory and Research. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4291-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4291-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5859-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4291-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive